News 
 State News 
 Wool 
 General 
 Wool growers fleeced by mulesing critics: Macdonald 

Wool growers fleeced by mulesing critics: Macdonald

24 Aug, 2009 12:14 PM
WOOL retailers concerned about animal welfare need to get off the backs of Australian farmers and give them time to reform sheep-handling practices, according to Primary Industries Minister Ian Macdonald.

Mr Macdonald met representatives of giant British retailer Marks & Spencer last week to argue that Australian wool producers needed more time to find substitutes for mulesing, in which excess skin around a Merino sheep's rear is removed to minimise flystrike.

The practice is deplored by animal welfare advocates who say it is painful and redundant, leading Marks & Spencer, the biggest single user of Australian fine wool, to pledge to eliminate the practice in its supply chain.

A company spokeswoman said Australian wool was "incredibly important" to Marks & Spencer, which recognised there was no single solution to replacing the practice.

"That's why members of the Marks & Spencer team have been in Australia talking to people and organisations across the wool industry to discuss progress being made on this issue," she said.

Ultimately, the only acceptable long-term solution was to breed the excess skin out of the sheep, known as bare breeching, she said.

Mr Macdonald said he told the Marks & Spencer representatives they risked "throwing the baby out with the bath water" if they placed onerous conditions on Australian producers. People concerned about animal welfare should remember mulesing helped prevent sheep suffer an excruciating death: being eaten alive by maggots after flystrike.

Banning it without a substitute would be a worse result for the sheep, he said.

"Science has shown that at the moment there is no realistic solution and retailers like Marks & Spencer have to be sure we don't end up with large-scale sheep deaths in Australia as farmers struggle to meet the demands of European consumers."

Marks & Spencer, which uses 1.5 per cent of the Australian wool clip, is Britain's largest clothing retailer, with a market share of 11.2 per cent by volume. NSW produces about 210,000 bales of adult merino wool a year, worth about $800 million. However, only about 4 per cent of that wool comes from sheep that have not been mulesed.

Studies have shown mulesing cuts the rate of flystrike from 40-100 per cent to just 1-3 per cent.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
What advice is the Department giving the Minister? The Minister does not speak to delegations such as that from Marks & Spencer without advice. The Department’s former Principal Research Scientist, Kevin Aitkins, who worked on Sheep Genetics, stated in an article in The Land that the minutes of the 1940 Joint Blowflystrike Control Committee was clear then that mulesing was a temporary solution and that breeding was required. Mulesing was the easy solution so nearly 70 years of breeding has left the industry exposed to accusations of cruelty. Procrastination now is not helping. Minister, back AWEX’s certification scheme to place unmulesed wool on the market and let the market decide – apart from that keep quiet as noise is not helping.
Posted by James, 24/08/2009 4:25:59 PM, on The Land
Are Marks & Spencer now experts in animal husbandry? Don't bother talking to people in large city offices or going for tweed wearing drives to talk to those who don't get covered in sheep shit. Ask that nice lady or invite her to see if she can dag a dung covered hogget with out removing large bits of skin. Maybe they need the stink of rotting flesh in their noses rather then the clean green McLeods Daughters images we normally give them. If retailers can sell cancer sticks to people who know it will kill them, then selling the need to mules should be easy as why breathing is a good idea.
Posted by THE FARMER, 24/08/2009 6:30:21 PM, on The Land
Congratulations Ian Macdonald. Your support of Aussie woolgrowers is much appreciated and very much needed. Please don't listen to idiots who want mulesing to stop asap. They are in effect desiring an end to all sheep farming full stop. Now Minister, if you could practicaly help us with wild dog control, you would get a huge vote from the bush.
Posted by jim hawkins, 24/08/2009 9:51:36 PM, on The Land
Accusations of cruelty levelled by a vegan organisation, which is itself accused of financial links to outlawed eco-terrorists in its place of birth. So which side of the bread is your butter on? Gee, that’s a hard one. The truth hurts when it kicks back, don’t it ?
Posted by The Blowfly, 25/08/2009 4:41:17 AM, on The Land
Good on you Ian!, tell these freaks what it is really about!
Posted by tigerdicky, 25/08/2009 9:50:36 AM, on The Land
It must be realised and accepted that rational arguments do not work with the radical end of the anti-mulesing activists. For these, however perverse it is, fly strike is just "nature taking its course", and any human-caused injury to animals (including clips) is anathema. They will not listen, they will not shut up, and they will continue to campaign. This is a PR battle that the industry cannot hope to win, and instread it should concentrate its efforts on bare-breech breeding.
Posted by morrgo, 25/08/2009 10:46:20 AM, on The Land
Ah, wonderfully balanced comments as always from the AWGA knuckle-scrapers. Just a hint - M&S aren't eco-terrorists, or vegans or radicals as the posts suggest. Yeah TF, they probably do work in cities and wear wool suits and you should thank everyone of them that do. They are called customers. Not the enemy. Most growers are tired of the way AWI and AWGA are using the old fashioned 'us versus them' to stir up support for Woolpoll. Time to say no to their divisiveness.
Posted by Sir George, 25/08/2009 10:54:48 AM, on The Land
Heaven help us! Don't say the dubious Sir George has raised his royal head again!
Posted by tigerdicky, 25/08/2009 12:08:18 PM, on The Land
Sir George and James are right - we forget that the reason we grow wool is to sell to people to wear. If the people who buy & wear the wool want it produced in a way that doesn't include what they see as cruelty, that is their right. And perpetuating this figure that you get 40-100% flystrike if you don't mules is irresponsible and wrong. If you don't mules and do absolutely nothing with them, that will happen but if you manage them as a responsible farmer should, you will get between 1-10% depending on how wrinkly your sheep are. Grow up and face the fact that you need to sell product to the world.
Posted by the Kid, 25/08/2009 12:25:50 PM, on The Land
Good to see Sir Lunchalot must have learnt about something west of the divide while lunching away. By the way Sir George calling people with a different point of view knuckle draggers does you no credit on this issue, most people who want mulesing to be retained are only representing what they think are in their livestock's best interests, no one has ever made money out of unhealthy animals!
Posted by Walta Coggy, 25/08/2009 12:48:06 PM, on The Land
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
NSW Primary Industries Minister Ian Macdonald
NSW Primary Industries Minister Ian Macdonald

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...