News 
 State News 
 Livestock 
 Cattle 
 Could Australia already have atypical BSE? 

Could Australia already have atypical BSE?

11 Mar, 2010 11:02 AM
NO matter what trade defences Australia erects, it may not be able to prevent domestic cases of “atypical” BSE - a cattle disease that seems to occur spontaneously, and which despite having no known health risks carries the same damaging trade implications as “classical” BSE.

Meanwhile, the world appears to be heading in the right direction for full eradication of classical BSE, the “mad cow disease” that devastated the British livestock industry in the mid-1980s and has subsequently killed 166 Britons.

With the likelihood of classical BSE being transmitted into the Australian herd now near zero, atypical BSE poses the greater threat to the beef industry, if only because of its potential effect on trade.

Atypical BSE has been found to differ from classical BSE in several ways, including the fact that it appears capable of cropping up in any herd without the feeding of meat and bone meal necessary to transmit classical BSE.

However, international trade policy currently treats the two forms of BSE in the same punitive way.

“That, in my opinion, definitely needs to be changed,” senior Commonwealth vet Dr Reg Butler told the Global Biosecurity Conference in Brisbane last week.

The Principal Veterinary Officer with the Federal Government’s Biosecurity Services Group, Dr Butler said the all available evidence points to atypical BSE being a sporadic disease, meaning that no prior presence of the disease is necessary for it to appear.

The strongest pattern to emerge to date from 51 cases of atypical BSE is related to age, Dr Butler said.

Except for a single animal in Japan, all cases have appeared in cattle older than eight years.

Atypical scrapie, the related disease in sheep and goats, has been found to be 100 times more common since it was first identified in 1998, but shows a similar pattern.

“The risk of getting an atypical scrapie case is related to flock size,” Dr Butler said.

“It’s not related to the fact that you’ve had a previous case in the flock, which is a strong indicator that it’s not a contagious disease.”

The risk of a sheep contracting atypical scrapie also increases with age, unlike classical scrapie, which is more likely to appear in animals in their first year.

The World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) has ruled that atypical scrapie is a separate disease to classical scrapie, and reporting cases of atypical scrapie does not carry the dire trade consequences associated with classical scrapie.

“We can’t say the same for atypical BSE,” Dr Butler said.

“While scientists recognise it as a different disease, a lot of trading partners and the international standard doesn’t, and therefore it presents the same trade risk as for a country that reports its first classical BSE case.”

The United States was shut out of the Korean and Japanese beef markets, to Australia’s great advantage, because of two cases of atypical BSE and one case of classical BSE in a cow imported from Canada.

David Adams, a retired vet who formerly worked with the Office of the Chief Veterinary Officer in Canberra, told a NSW Farmers Association meeting on Tuesday that it was in Australia’s interests to work for a clear policy distinction between atypical and classical BSE.

“I think we need to be working on this at an international level,” Dr Adams said. “We don’t carry the BSE baggage that the United Kingdom and the European Union have, and we can play an important role in influencing the discussion.”

Dr Adams also told the meeting that classical BSE “is virtually gone from the world”.

Eliminating the disease, as smallpox has been eliminated, is a real possibility, he said. “There is only one mode of transmission - feeding of meat and bone meal: stop that, and you’ve stopped the disease in its tracks.”

However, Dr Butler told the Global Biosecurity conference that some work remained to be done on atypical BSE.

The disease can be transmitted from ruminants to primates by injecting primates with infected material, but it’s still uncertain whether primates, including humans, can get the disease by eating the damaged proteins.

Scientists are also unsure whether the damaged prions responsible for atypical BSE are confined to the central nervous system, or can be found in other parts of the body.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
They're not your typical mad cows!
Posted by Enlightened, 11/03/2010 11:25:58 AM, on The Land
I reckon if you left that question up to the free traders there's a fair chance you would get a-typical answer!
Posted by Temporaryfarmer, 11/03/2010 4:51:43 PM, on The Land
So all this uncertainty and a senior scientist thinks we should change our policy on that premise! What is he trying to do - kill our international trade with rumours? This sounds like a laborite stooge doing US bidding - he isn't Minister Burke in disguise per chance? For a vet he seems to have as much acumen for agriculture as the minister!
Posted by gordons49, 12/03/2010 8:49:13 AM, on The Land
So classical BSE is dead and scientists need something else to get funds for - very a-typical. Next thing they will link a-typically atypical BSE with climate change and global warming. Then the emedia will hype it up suitably to get reader and viewer ratings up.
Posted by MAD HATTER, 12/03/2010 9:04:48 AM, on The Land
What an irresponsible article! If we had cows staggering around with BSE we would know about it and the truth is we do not! Any staggering cow we have usually has a temporary condition such as grain poisoning that in no way can be confused with BSE. Please do not muddy the waters like this or include a video of the atypical case with a full history and location.
Posted by Common Cents, 12/03/2010 10:09:19 AM, on The Land
What a peice of drivel! Did Mr Cowal have a mind blanc and need an article to present to the editor? "Meanwhile, the world appears to be heading in the right direction for full eradication of classical BSE, the “mad cow disease” that devastated the British livestock industry in the mid-1980s and has subsequently killed 166 Britons". How did he come to that conclusion when Canada has just reported another positive test of BSE Mad Cow? The crux of it is that there is still BSE in those countries affected by it and Australia should remain vigilant in keeping it out!
Posted by jillaroo, 12/03/2010 2:17:02 PM, on The Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
08 March, 2010
09 March, 2010
10 March, 2010
POLL
Q: Should the Federal Government step in and overhaul the corporate structure of Australian Wool Innovation?

Yes
(42.4%)

No
(43.3%)

Not yet
(14.3%)

Total Votes: 413
Poll Date: 07 March, 2010

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...