News 
 State News 
 Livestock 
 Cattle 
 Beef plan ‘naive’, says MLA 

Beef plan ‘naive’, says MLA

01 Aug, 2010 03:00 AM
THE recently released beef strategic plan has been labelled “naive” by Meat and Livestock Australia’s (MLA’s) chairman, Don Heatley, who said the plan would only confuse customers and add to duplication, not reduce it.

The plan was prepared by solicitors, Hunt Partners, Sydney, following the Armidale beef forum earlier this year and was presented to the audience at the Rockhampton beef forum.

The strategic plan proposes to reduce producer expenditure, increase returns and reduce duplication by splitting MLA into a sheep and beef corporation, introducing a national beef grading scheme, abolishing the Australian Meat Processor Corporation (AMPC) and Red Meat Advisory Council and removing the Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service (AQIS) charges by putting them back onto government.

Hunt Partners partner, Norman Hunt, said a national grading system more like the US model of a carcase-based grading system – as opposed to the existing Meat Standards Australia (MSA) cuts-based system – would help capture more of the domestic market beef for grading, while a restructure of research and development bodies was expected to reduce costs and duplication.

The plan estimated a nationally adopted grading system could increase per capita annual consumption of beef by 2.5 kilograms to 36.3kg a year, which it estimated would take the domestic beef consumption to 62 per cent of current beef production.

Mr Hunt said the problem with MSA was that it hadn’t been adopted by large sectors of the industry (including much of the supermarket sector), and so most beef Australians ate was ungraded, “and a lucky dip for eating quality”.

“If uptake of MSA was able to be extended to embrace most of the beef sold on the domestic market, we would end up with the same result (as the strategic plan aims for),” he said.

The release of the plan comes soon after MLA announced MSA’s year-on-year increase in uptake of about 27pc, to take the number of MSA-graded carcases to 1.25 million for the year to the end of June.

Mr Heatley said MSA was now making headway into the supermarkets, with Costco and IGA stores stocking MSA-graded beef, which demonstrated a slow, but progressively expanding market share for graded beef.

While the carcase-based grading scheme was working well in the US, Mr Heatley said the adoption of a similar system wouldn’t work as well in Australia because the US system was based on subjective assumptions and the US had a different production system.

He said the US system wasn’t “test driven” with consumers to see what they wanted.

“MSA has repeatedly put meat in front of consumers for sensory testing to see what they want, and what the industry needs to provide,” Mr Heatley said.

“It should be the industry listening to the consumer.”

He said the US system was based on an industry with about 98pc grain finishing, whereas Australia finishes only about 34pc of its beef on grain.

As for the rate of uptake of the US system, he said it took 20 years before it gained widespread acceptance, so it was still early days for MSA.

The proposal to restructure the research and development (R and D) sector was to tackle what Mr Hunt said was a system which duplicated research and channelled levies into limited areas of industry.

He said MLA and the AMPC both had R and D programs allowing individual companies to apply for jointly funded programs.

He said these were partially funded by industry levies, but the only party gaining from the research was often the successful applicant, rather than the whole of industry.

Therefore, the plan proposed new R and D bodies be developed which were fully funded by government.

“The whole industry wants to decrease costs by government, but (this plan) is an aspirational wish list which different bodies have been lobbying for for many years,” Mr Heatley said.

“It is a work in progress and I find it a little naive to find anybody could think the current industry structures weren’t set up to achieve this already.”

Mr Heatley said the plan came as MLA was about to launch its $5 million campaign which will include an MSA logo with an eating quality description and cooking methods at point of sale.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Predictable response from MLA to Hunt plan. The status quo is not an option and the industry structure in place is way past its use by date. Perhaps a change of government Federally will prompt a change. Not many organisations will review plans to lessen their cosy position.
Posted by Sweeney, 1/08/2010 12:53:06 PM, on The Land
MLA is a statutory service provider and Heatley, as its chairman, should bugger off out of the political debate in relation to whether or not MLA should be split, out-sourced or just gotten rid of all together. Heatley is not in any position to call anything or anyone “naïve” whilst at the same time putting his hand out for statutory funding.
Posted by PAYG, 2/08/2010 9:56:50 AM, on The Land
Sweeney, unfortunately, a change of government in the case of agriculture policy would probably be a step backwards. I'm no fan of Labor, but Burke has been one of the better ag ministers because he has been willing to look at issues without the albatross of emotional prior involvement around his neck. I agree with both your and PAYG's comments other than that. At the 2007 BeefWorks in Toowoomba, the MSA graded meat served to all conference attendees was inedible.
Posted by Bush Brumby, 2/08/2010 1:56:16 PM, on The Land
MLA rolled out MSA 12 years ago but now Heatley says it will take another 20 years to be accepted. Anyone who has problems with a grading system with a 32 year gestation period is labeled "naive" by this beef bureaucrat. Why can't MLA own up to the fact that MSA has failed the market test and sit down with Woolworths or Coles or both and work out what modifications are required to get MSA-graded beef onto their shelves?
Posted by john from tamworth, 2/08/2010 6:57:52 PM, on The Land
Don Heatley should resign for making such arrogant comments. The members he is meant to represent want a better grading system and have been asking for it for decades. Don if you don't want to represent your members, go and get a job somewhere else. You won't be missed by any of us, I can assure you. Finally something is happening for the good of the industry. It should have been done by the MLA. Beef consumption has been falling here for decades now while the MLA has stood back and done very little. In the US where they have a simple grading system it has remained steady. Shame on you Don. These comments and actions from the MLA don't help moral in the bush.
Posted by Scott, 12/08/2010 9:41:56 AM, on The Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
25 July, 2010
27 July, 2010
29 July, 2010

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...