News 
 State News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 Looking for a breath of fresh air at GGA 

Looking for a breath of fresh air at GGA

12 Feb, 2010 01:33 PM
IF PULLABOOKA, west of Grenfell, NSW, farmer Dan Cooper gets elected to the Grain Growers Association (GGA) board at next week’s annual general meeting, it will be a great fillip for the association’s youth leadership program.

In recent years Mr Cooper has participated in both GGA’s Innovation Generation and Future Grains Industry Leaders programs.

Now he has decided to take the skills learnt from these programs and throw his hat in the ring for a position on the board as a central zone director.

Mr Cooper will contest the position with incumbent Steve Hargreaves, who was elected last year due to a casual vacancy, and as such, must face election from the members this year.

The major platform for Mr Cooper’s run at the board is to get a fresh face and the views of a new generation onto the GGA executive.

“The main reason for me running is to give the board a fresh look from the younger generation’s perspective.”

He hopes to see GGA evolve into a similar organisation to America’s US Wheat Associates, playing a role in advocacy and promotions, as well as developing trade links with potential wheat-buying nations.

GGA’s recent evolution, including the purchase of BRI and the merger with Kondinin Group were a step in the right direction, he said.

“It is a good idea, it will just take some time to get them settled down.”

He said the company needed to find its niche, rather than try and reach right across the grains sector.

“I think filling some of those old functions of the single desk are required, certainly the promotions work and some of the research and development, especially in terms of classification.”

Mr Cooper said Australia’s post-production service to international customers had slipped since deregulation.

“We are not servicing our customers as well as we could be, on a recent trip to south-east Asia I met with quite a few millers, and the major feedback was that there needed to be some sort of representation.

“There’s certainly a void there, a lot of the millers we met with are looking to see some sort of representation, and there also needs to be training how to best use our wheat.”

He said GGA could also play a crucial role in relaying customer requirements to farmers, so they were growing the varieties that were wanted by the market.

“There is plenty there that GGA can do, and I think we can do it at a fraction of the cost of US Wheat Associates.”

He said this should be made even easier by focusing solely on Asia with promotion.

“We need to concentrate on Asia, that is going to be our key market, and I believe it makes sense to focus on markets that are both high value and that we have a freight advantage into.”

Regarding changes to the GGA structure, Mr Cooper said he supported the abolition of the regional committees, but said the timing could be better.

He said low participation rates were evidence the regional committee structure had passed its use-by date.

“Looking at it, there are only two regions that have a full complement of members, so it is clear that there is limited contribution from members via the regional committees.”

Mr Cooper said he was firmly behind the appointment of independent directors.

“There really is the need for those different skill sets.”

He said while the GGA constitution required a majority of directors and the chairman to be farmers there was little chance of growers losing control of the organisation, as has been claimed by those against appointing independent directors.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
It seems to me that those growers and traders who were the architects of the campaign for deregulation now want the functions of the single desk back. Too smart by half. But guess who will pay to establish the trade advocacy they want to re-establish? Of course pro-deregulators will argue that growers were paying for it before, which of course is true, but at least we HAD a system that efficiently linked our wheat to specific markets, and worked within the markets to help our customers get the benefits of Aussie wheat. I am so sick and tired of the 'spin' put on the benefits of deregulation. Show me the benefits to me the wheat grower. Show the dairy farmers what benefits they now have. I could go on...
Posted by cannona, 12/02/2010 5:36:09 PM, on The Land
ho-humm.....around spins the newly reinvented wheel.
Posted by mark2, 13/02/2010 1:56:12 PM, on The Land
Daniel stuck to the GGA script in working to destroy the single desk. No prizes for guessing that the Board do not want him now. You will learn the hard way young fellow!
Posted by Realist, 15/02/2010 6:32:47 AM, on The Land
When and why is Youth better than qualifications and experiance. You don't send a boy out to do a mans job is the old saying. Strong leadership is built on experiance and good mentoring. This is a Multi Million dollars members Association which deserves experianced leaders which has been lacking for a while now. Well done Dan for sticking your hand up but doing a short course in leadership does not qualify you to be a world leader. Especially now that deregulation of the Wheat exports which you and other young blokes supported so excitedly has been proven as warned to you as a dud. Now you want to reinvent the wheel. Learn to run the farm first Dan dont fall for the same mistake other misguided young people have done, there are a lot of people out there that love to use you young blokes as toys for their own gain. Then dump you when they fail.
Posted by Puzzled, 15/02/2010 8:10:39 AM, on The Land
Well done Dan for putting yourself out there as a candidate. Regardless of what decisions have been made over the last few years in the grains industry or even if you dont support those developments, there is nothing to be achieved by refusing to improve the current situation. The grains industry like all areas of Agriculture needs new blood, sure they dont know everything and are going to make mistakes, but at least if the transition starts now they will be around a few old heads to help them and the industry. At the end of the day I would prefer to have a director is positive and passionate about the grains industry and who will have to live with any poor decisons along with any other grower rather that a director that is semi retired and just filling in time.
Posted by Diesel, 15/02/2010 8:12:56 AM, on The Land
Diesel, some of the directors have sons at home snapping at their heels. That's why they show a strong interest in the future succes of the industry - it is because they want a better future for their own kids. But just like handing over the farm you don't give it to them the day they leave school. Normally they get experiance before you place that risk around their neck. Directors, whether they know it or not, carry a huge responsibility that voters should not place on the inexperienced.
Posted by Puzzled, 15/02/2010 2:34:01 PM, on The Land
Yes Puzzled what you say is quite right, some directors do have sons and daughters involved in agriculture, but are you suggesting that if this was not the case they would not be seeking a role on the board? Either way simply "showing a strong interest" should not be enough to gain a spot on the the board. Being a director is a crucial role and that should not be left to someone who simply shows a "strong interest in the future success of the industry", we need more than that. Puzzled you noted previously that GGA has been lacking in leadership for a while, so why not start the process that we both agree needs to happen now by replacing the self funded retirees with the two new directors that not only have a "strong interest" but also have the abillity to contribute and provide leadership going forward. Qualities that are a bit light on the ground at the moment. If it was not for the proxy votes that the directors up for relection and the rest of the board hold, the directors who are seeking relection would not have a chance. Wouldn't it be nice to have the successful candidates elected on merit and not due to the legacy of a out dated system?
Posted by Diesel, 15/02/2010 10:31:22 PM, on The Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Dan Cooper.
Dan Cooper.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...