News 
 State News 
 Education 
 General 
 Buses snub the belt 

Buses snub the belt

10 Oct, 2009 04:00 AM
A total of $38.5 million to put life-saving seat belts into country buses remains unspent as a program to protect rural school children slowly dies.

Bush students still bounced to school in no-belt buses last month as bus companies failed to take advantage of a $25,000 offer from the Commonwealth.

Dodging kangaroos at high speeds on dirt roads was one of the reasons a group of mums wanted their children buckled down.

They argued almost $200 million made in bus insurance claims in NSW between 1996 and 2006 would have been reduced with seat belts.

September marked the second anniversary of a $40 million allocation from John Howard’s Government toward seat belts in regional buses.

But there is concern these millions of dollars have been slow getting to bus companies under the Labor Federal Government.

Just $1.5m, less than five per cent of the $40m, had been spent as of September.

It should be 10 times that amount two years into what has become a lacklustre program.

Bus companies must apply for the Seat Belts For Kids money and there is no way under the program to force them into the voluntary scheme.

Since 2007, 47 buses had seat belts added, while the life-saving devices were included in 32 new buses – that was a total of 79 buses getting seatbelts in two years, almost 700 buses short of the target.

Dogs have to be legally restrained when travelling into town and so do loads of grain, but kids can tumble about inside a bus, argue outspoken mums throughout the State.

One of the most vocal pro-seat belt parents in NSW, mother-of-five, Fiona Hart, “Kynwoor”, Naradhan, wants federal legislation changed to protect rural pupils.

“It would cost $13,000 to have my children’s bus modified,” said Mrs Hart, who is organising a national protest day in the near future.

“This would include new seats plus belts and anchorage points.”

In 2007, then Prime Minister John Howard wanted to put seatbelts into 375 country buses every year for four years.

At the time, two months before he was dislodged as Prime Minister, Mr Howard described it as “simple” money – “no review, it will just happen”.

Mrs Hart wants seatbelts to become mandatory, not voluntary, on all buses.

“And please do not leave it up to the proprietor as the types of restraints will all be different,” Mrs Hart has said in letters to politicians.

Pro-seatbelt mums want Australian Design Rule 68 changed.

It states route buses do not need seat belts – the definition of a route bus relates to the height of the seat from the floor.

Longtime seat belt campaigner and mother of two, Glenda Staniford, Fern Gully Winery, Termeil, said the rule was meant to apply to urban buses doing short, slow trips.

She said a written response from the Federal Government stated Australian Design Rule 68 was being reviewed.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


No comments yet. Be the first to comment below.

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Fiona Hart, “Kynwoor”, Naradhan, with her four school-aged children, Harry, Emma, Steven, and Matthew.
Fiona Hart, “Kynwoor”, Naradhan, with her four school-aged children, Harry, Emma, Steven, and Matthew.
Related Coverage
POLL
Q: Do you think capturing exhaust emissions in soil will work?

Yes
(44.6%)

No, but it's worth trying to come up with a carbon solution.
(18.8%)

No, all these theories are a waste of time.
(22.3%)

I don't know.
(14.3%)

Total Votes: 224
Poll Date: 07 October, 2009

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...