News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 What the voters think in Lyne 

What the voters think in Lyne

08 Sep, 2010 09:50 AM
AS ROB Oakeshott took to his Parliament House lectern to announce who he had finally decided to make prime minister, one of the televisions in one of his local pubs, the Port Macquarie Hotel, was switched from a racing channel to the news.

Five of his constituents lingered to watch the announcement.

Another half-dozen ambled over to the other side of the bar where they could watch the dogs at Devonport and the trots at Menangle uninterrupted.

When at the end of his 20-minute oration (and much groaning and eye-rolling in the front bar) Mr Oakeshott confirmed he was guaranteeing supply to a Gillard Labor government, only one man seemed happy.

''I always thought Rob was going to vote Labor, but he could have got to the point a lot faster,'' said Adrian Anderson, perhaps voicing a view held across the nation.

Sadly for Mr Oakeshott, Mr Anderson's support is not much use, he was passing through Port Macquarie on business.

At a table behind him sat Andrew McLeish, a local plasterer, who was far less happy.

''I'm still scarred from the '80s when I finished school and Labor had interest rates up to 17 per cent. I'll never vote Labor.'' Mr McLeish believes Mr Oakeshott's decision flies in the face of most of his constituents - conservatives who were won over by Mr Oakeshott's energetic independence.

Over the road at the offices of the Country Women's Association, branch president Margaret Oswald (''like Lee Harvey'') agrees.

''I think it's a very brave move,'' she says in Sir Humphrey's tone.

Mrs Oswald thinks Mr Oakeshott ''is a nice young man'' who has done his best, but in the last election he finally had some competition from a strong Nationals candidate, David Gillespie, and Mr Oakeshott has lost Mrs Oswald's support.

Her friend Jean De Giovanni voted for the Greens, because she had had enough of both major parties, but so impressed was she by Mr Oakeshott's careful explanation of his decision to support Labor that she has already decided to vote for him next time.

A few blocks away at the bowling club, 20 minutes after the speech, most of the blokes on the green were unaware that the decision had been made, and unmoved when they learnt the result.

''What's the difference?'' asked 82-year-old Frank Drew. ''I don't reckon any of 'em do any good.''

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I was amazed just how long Oakeshott took to say "I love Labor for my self-serving interests" yesterday. While he was giving his long-hand version of this text I shore a run of wethers, the last one kicked a bit at first, but went down the shoot nice and quiet.
Posted by labor licker, 8/09/2010 2:07:55 PM, on The Land
Don't Rob, they will realise that you have done only the best for them!
Posted by tigerdicky, 8/09/2010 4:41:22 PM, on The Land
Watching Oakeshott trying to justify his decision in such a way to try and deflect any semblance of self interest made me want to vomit. He's a disgrace and I hope this reflects in his electorate at the appropriate time. Go and grandstand for the socialists at the next election, you're not wanted here.
Posted by Rural, 8/09/2010 9:09:31 PM, on The Land
Dear labor licker, as you haven't noticed I must point out to you that he hasn't done it for his self-serving interest. He like Windsor has done it for what he believes will be best for country Australia. And by the way I hope you didn't shoot the sheep you shore but rather put them down the chute.
Posted by daw, 8/09/2010 10:42:21 PM, on The Land
Personnal popularity is one thing but ignoring the values and preferences of the electorate is another. Time will tell how forgiving they are. In addition to that indescretion, basically he has just condonned the wasteful spending and rorting of the BER, the insulation disaster (and deaths) and the computers in schools fiasco. Labor now will never be held to account for gross ineptitude. Labor will ensure that very little of those promises made to the independants will ever see the light of day before the next election when their support will not count. Rob is obviously naive and does not understand the Labor party machine. He sadly has has been conned by the best.
Posted by yoda, 8/09/2010 11:22:21 PM, on The Land
The majority of the electorates view about Oakeshott could be best summed up by a contributor to yesterdays (Wed 8/9)) SMH opinion section. "Rob Oakshott - am I ever going to see your face again?"
Posted by Totally Cheesed Off, 9/09/2010 10:49:11 AM, on The Land
Yes yoda, I feel that this period in politics will be remembered for betrayal, cheating & underhand deals, & a Judas act on an elected prime minister, which Gillard can never claim to be, in an attempt to get a bad government out of the toilet, where it thoroughly deserved to be. We voted to flush the toilet, that is what most wanted, but more dealing & betrayal has just left the bowl full of more dirty paper....
Posted by a GRAZIER, 9/09/2010 11:32:08 AM, on The Land
Seems many Coalition voters are poor losers. No info. given here why regional Australia would be worse off with the deal done with Labor. Methinks that the extra billions to go now to regional Australia can only be worthwhile. Some 97% of the school building was welcomed by the schools and the tragic losses of life with batts were caused by dodgy businesses - wait for the coroner reports! Who would want to form a partnership with a Coalition that lied to the people about the cost of its election promises.
Posted by Cyril, 9/09/2010 12:20:35 PM, on The Land
Paid for a new tax on regional Australia, a good deal for regional Australia, don’t think so. Suddenly the lack of care for regional Australia seems to be Labor policy, the party that says "fair go for all". Seems only if they need to get govt. Also shows the poor performance of the Nats in representing regional Australia.
Posted by dunart, 9/09/2010 5:34:39 PM, on The Land
Cyril - If Oakeshott’s how to vote card preferenced the Coalition ahead of Labor then Coalition supporters have every right to be ‘sore losers’. You see, it might be a breach of an implied promise which goes to one’s principles.
Posted by PAYG, 9/09/2010 9:06:05 PM, on The Land
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Independent MP Rob Oakeshott.
Independent MP Rob Oakeshott.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
07 September, 2010
08 September, 2010

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...