News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Stoner's Basin ultimatum 

Stoner's Basin ultimatum

24 Nov, 2011 03:00 AM
THE NSW government will walk away from a draft Murray Darling Basin Plan unless it fully addresses issues raised when the ill-fated guide to the controversial plan was released last October.

Deputy Premier Andrew Stoner foreshadowed legal action to snatch power over water back from the Federal government as one option if the plan, to be finally released on Monday, is not up to scratch.

“Unless the draft plan gives equal weight to economic and social factors, as well as environmental factors, we will not play ball with the Feds,” Mr Stoner told The Land.

The NSW government wants to see a triple bottom line outcome, reductions allocated equitably across the State, and, most importantly a rollout of promised infrastructure funding for technology efficiencies, before water cuts take effect.

“If these concerns are addressed, I guess we may be in a position to co-operate. But if the draft doesn’t tick any of those boxes, we won’t sit idly by and see the regional NSW irrigation community get trashed,” Mr Stoner (pictured) said.

“There are a number of things we could do if the outcome is not satisfactory; we could withdraw our contribution to the authority, we could challenge aspects of the plan or seek legal advice to change legislation that gave the feds a lot of say into water.”

Mr Stoner said there had been “tacit acceptance” by the Murray Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) and Federal government to put water efficiency infrastructure projects – and Federal funding for these – first, but recent events meant the NSW government was less than confident this would occur.

“Everybody is a little tense – this process has been unfolding for some time now and after good initial efforts, recent events have put a dampener on and we have no cause to be optimistic. We thought it got back on the rails initially but now it is all getting a bit wobbly.”

Mr Stoner said while MDBA chairman Craig Knowles had done a good job of rebuilding trust in the plan after the release of the guide, confidence in the MDBA process was now crumbling.

Mr Stoner foreshadowed the Victorian government would likely fall in with the NSW government and unite in opposition to the draft if it was not considered up to scratch.

NSW Farmers has also expressed concern with the draft plan which it says it cannot accept based on what it has seen so far.

MDBA boss Craig Knowles this week acknowledged the draft plan would generate obvious disagreement from State governments, irrigators and environmental groups.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The NSW Government has been helping the MDBA develop this draft and they are fully aware of its contents.
Posted by Craig Knowles, MDBA Chair, 24/11/2011 8:24:25 AM, on The Land
Thank You Andrew Stoner

Water buybacks, uncertainty of more, no community consultation, no provision for house and business owners in the towns, no compensation for people already been forced to move and sell up, elderly relatives stranded in towns while rest of family moves on to find work, loss of teachers, nurses, police, more people on welfare, empty houses

Minister Burke and the Murray Darling Basin Authority have addressed NONE of these issues !

They won't even visit the smaller towns they are destroying like Hay !

Posted by PetefromHay, 24/11/2011 9:13:39 AM, on The Land
Craig, everyone is aware of the drafts contents you leaked them on your website.

Only one state is happy with the draft, the one that only has one river and has 1000's km's of pipes diverting the precious fresh water to desert towns and an overpopulated desert city at the end of the system.

South Australia

Posted by PetefromHay, 24/11/2011 10:23:01 AM, on The Land
Just wait until March next year and we will add Queensland to the non-Labor states that reject this sleazy deal. The green/left scum had their chance to deliver a fair, equitable and appropriate plan and they completely blew it. They seriously believed that any government has the right to ignore the interests of the people they are supposed to govern for.

So as Bob Dylan sang, "get out of the new world if you can't lend a hand, for the times they are a changin".

Posted by Ian Mott, 24/11/2011 11:14:47 AM, on The Land
Mr Stoner is right Mr Knowles he is foretelling what you already know, that the draft plan is useless and most of the states will be worse off because of it. He at least has the decency not to leak the detail before you release it but you can sure read between the lines!
Posted by Farmer Greg, 24/11/2011 11:51:20 AM, on The Land
Also, only one state that capped it's use in 1969, used it's own funds over that period to modernise it's infrastructure and delivery systems and has the most efficient on farm irrigation in the land.

Only one state that has already had hundreds of irrigators exit the industry due to allocation cuts.

And yes we do use pipes, as opposed to your 1000's of km's of earthen channel.

But don't you worry Pete, we will be the one's who lose the most. We will take a cut the same as you, regardless of the investment we have made over the years and the hundreds that have already left the industry.

Posted by fridgimus, 24/11/2011 12:00:07 PM, on The Land
The only thing that has surprised me is that there has a been a post here by Craig Knowles.

If he, or his underlings, read these pages then I find it incongruous that they have failed to take note that there has been many posts calling for water allocations to be left untouchedd and to leave in production all water schemes that exist.

Their Myopia has prevented them seeing that there are means of wiser use of our precious resource even though it has been put in writing, sent to, and listed by them.

If they can't or won't see that our prosperity is dependent on water they should be SACKED.

Posted by daw, 24/11/2011 1:19:39 PM, on The Land
South Australia continually skips over the fact most of the fresh water from NSW, Vic and Qld evaporates and seeps out of the system on its long trip down to Murray Bridge and your natural Salt water Estuary's

Not only will Hay take a cut it will also cop an increased flood risk, and Riverine flood insurance is not easily attainable or cheap.

Look whats at the end of the river in South Australia, an Irrigated Golf course and Irrigated Dairy .. how can South Australia expect to be taken seriously on this matter.

Posted by PetefromHay, 24/11/2011 3:23:49 PM, on The Land
You best take a drive downstream and educate yourself Pete.

Not many dairy's left there now.

You might even find out about best practise irrigation systems.

Still, I suppose it's easier to sit back and keep using techniques developed over one hundred years ago and have the tax payer bring you into the modern world.

Posted by fridgimus, 25/11/2011 7:29:13 PM, on The Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...