News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 MDBA credibility in balance 

MDBA credibility in balance

29 Nov, 2010 09:48 AM
THE credibility of the Murray Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) “hangs in the balance”, according to Wentworth Group Scientist Chris Miller.

Speaking at a NSW Farm Writers lunch gathering in Sydney on Friday, Professor Miller said the much-delayed release of the draft guide to the plan had been badly handled by the Federal Government.

“The publication of what was a much-delayed draft guide to the Murray Darling Basin Plan should have been hailed as a historic moment in Australia,” Professor Miller said.

He said it should have been a time when the MDBA handed down recommendations that would lead to a federally-driven basin-wide strategy to secure long-term environmental sustainability for the environment and for irrigated agriculture.

It should have offered the prospect of long term sustainable livelihoods for Basin communities, “albeit a future with less water”, he said.

“Instead, the Guide, and the credibility of the Authority, really hangs in the balance.

“It’s in danger of being put in the too-hard basket, or worse, delivering some kind of compromise package that satisfies no one, leaves the environment at risk and therefore leaves farmers and growers at risk as well.”

Professor Miller, of the School of Social and Policy Studies, Flinders University, South Australia, spent six months undertaking research on behalf of the MDBA to gain an understanding of the economic and social impact of the water allocation cuts being proposed.

He was a co-author of the Wentworth Groups' controversial paper published in June 2010 analysing the options for achieving a sustainable diversion limit (SDL) in the Murray-Darling Basin.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Miller's talk was the most verbose claptrap I've ever heard. Bronwyn did a good job figuring out he said this much.

And after all that, he's got it totally wrong.

Posted by dickytiger, 29/11/2010 11:59:07 AM, on The Land
what credibility, this whole junket was set up to get more water into the Coorong to plicate the whims of shoreline property developers who put a lot of money into lobbying politicians for their self serving interests, the "environmental flows" were used as the pretext because no credibility would be given to the real reason which was always shoreline real estate values and the demands of the SA motor boat brigade
Posted by what the, 29/11/2010 12:11:50 PM, on The Land
MDBA credibility "hangs in the balance" because of their obvious reliance on the work of the Wentworth Group. Access Economics found holes all through their report, yet their members work is relyed upon by the MDBA as "best available science". We're screwed!
Posted by IddyB, 29/11/2010 1:34:08 PM, on The Land
Wentworth Group. No friend to farmers.
Posted by Pro Freedom, 29/11/2010 3:42:45 PM, on The Land
I dont think you find to many South Australian Irrigators arguing with them. You lot make out SA is the villan even though we capped our use in the 60's and have by far the most efficient use and delivery. You need to get real.
Posted by fridgimus, 30/11/2010 6:36:26 AM, on The Land
The Wentworth Group have no authority to destroy our farmers and communities - the real issue is depopulation control - these people are very dangerous
Posted by Genazzano, 30/11/2010 7:57:37 AM, on The Land
Verbose it was indeed. And embarrassing for the organisers no doubt
Posted by The Differentiator, 30/11/2010 8:41:12 AM, on The Land
No report or study has any credibility if it works back from a pre conceived result. Academics who don't have to earn a living in the real world, don't have much credibility either.
Posted by R, 30/11/2010 9:20:21 AM, on The Land
Another rent seeker, relishing his taxpayer funded new found stardom, pontificating about solutions which will impact others but not him. Worst case scenario is he gets it 100% wrong, and then he can pontifcate about the next set of solutions. Never trust an expert who has no need to achieve or their cashflow stops.
Posted by ME Again, 30/11/2010 10:46:13 AM, on The Land
Sorry - I got that wrong. Prof. Miller is not a rent seeker. He did six months of research for the MBDA - that won't be for free! And he's clearly worried that his work hasn't generated an opportunity for basin wide, federally funded, further effort...albeit in a future with less water!!

MBDA: 280 employees, $1b forward funding: do you really think they will come up with a plan which doesn't entrench themselves? Spend the money on delivery systems and proper metering...sorry - too easy.

Posted by ME Again, 30/11/2010 11:07:22 AM, on The Land
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Chris Miller.
Chris Miller.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
17 November, 2010
08 October, 2010
20 November, 2010
18 November, 2010

Most popular articles




The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...