News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Home at last, but for Oakeshott there's still some talking to do 

Home at last, but for Oakeshott there's still some talking to do

09 Sep, 2010 06:42 AM
AS ROB OAKESHOTT was doing a phone interview with a Melbourne radio station yesterday morning an elderly man ambled into his Port Macquarie electorate office and handed the receptionist a T-shirt emblazoned with Mr Oakeshott's name.

''I won't have any more use for this,'' he told the receptionist, turning and walking straight back out.

In a cafe a few blocks away a newspaper sat with a picture of Mr Oakeshott on the front page. Someone had drawn an arrow sticking into his eye and blood gushing out.

The independent MP might be back home after 17 days of negotiations, but he clearly still has some talking to do. Many in his conservative electorate are angry over his decision to allow Labor to form government.

Fronting a media pack, Mr Oakeshott again insisted he had not supported Labor, rather that he had guaranteed supply to a government but would be happy to negotiate legislation with either side of politics.

It is a distinction lost on most of the locals who spoke to the Sydney Morning Herald. Not lost is the bag of goodies Mr Oakeshott managed to bring home with him.

Most impressive to locals is the $75 million he secured for the long overdue extension to the regional hospital.

David Gillespie, the doctor who stood against Mr Oakeshott for the Nationals, said on Monday there were three key issues on the mid-north coast. ''First is the Port Macquarie Base Hospital, second is the Port Macquarie Base Hospital and third is the Port Macquarie Base Hospital.''

Mr Oakeshott is also keen to be recognised for extracting funding to expand the Pacific Highway and improve tertiary education in the region.

He also believes the extent of any backlash might have been overstated by the media.

He concedes that just 13 per cent of his constituents voted Labor, but notes that according to one poll of those who voted for him, 40 per cent directed their preferences to the Coalition and 36 to Labor.

''You've got to understand that you are standing in a town that does not have political party representation at a local level, at a state level or at a federal level.''

Port Macquarie, he believes, has shrugged off party politics.

Mr Oakeshott said he had not had time to discuss with his wife, Sara-Jane (who is about to have the couple's fourth child), whether he could balance the cabinet position offered by the Prime Minister with family life.

When questioned over his rambling 17-minute address to the nation on Tuesday, he hinted he may well accept the regional affairs portfolio.

''In question time, I promise you, I would stick to the rules of 45 seconds for questions and four minutes for answers.''

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Does anyone know what numbers Rob Oakeshott had on his how to vote leaflets? It would be interesting how his preferences were listed.
Posted by Jenny, 9/09/2010 9:01:21 AM, on The Land
I have got news for Port Macquarie, it is not the whole Lyne electorate. We hear on the southern end of the electorate will not be wearing any Oakeshott T shirts, unless they are in the form of a target. Already the naive infant has been found wanting with Swan running rings around him and the spin doctors readying the script on how to undeliver "promises". Enjoy your time with the sun shining in; there is another black hole you forget to think about.
Posted by Sweeney, 9/09/2010 9:54:42 AM, on The Land
The poll that counts is the distribution of Senate votes in Buckshott's electorate. And that vote was weighted 3 to 2 in favour of the LNP. The voters had no trouble reaching a verdict on the competence of Labor on election day but it took this goose another 17 days and still got it wrong. So which part of "fraudulent mandate" does he not understand?
Posted by Ian Mott, 9/09/2010 10:44:20 AM, on The Land
Jenny, as far as I know, Rob Oakeshott didn't direct his preferences. Mr Mott, Senate votes are for state representatives, not electorate level. In any case, this whole argument about local preferences is spurious. Because of his situation as an Indie in a hung parliament, Oakeshott had to make a decision that reflected what was best for Australia, not just what his country-bumpkin electorate wanted. He followed the swing and swerved to the left - absolutely the right choice. What would you have preferred? That he supported the Libs who have done a grand total of nothing for the electorate of Lyne during the 11 years of Howard's term? And before you all start barking, I'm from Lyne too.
Posted by Fair Dinkum Country Cousin, 9/09/2010 2:02:03 PM, on The Land
Gosh, a guy claiming to be a "fair dinkum country cousin" but can't help himself tossing around terms like "country bumpkin"? Who are you trying to kid? The Senate vote that was recorded by the electors in the Federal Division of Lyne was an incontestible record of the voters collective will when the smoke and mirrors of Buckshott's ersatz, lower house independence was removed from the equation. It is now burned into the historical record. And anyone who seriously believes that the swing in the past election was towards Labor, and that Buckshott was merely following that swing, either has a very serious retention deficit or a major problem with substance residues.
Posted by Ian Mott, 9/09/2010 2:30:54 PM, on The Land
Fair dinkum country cousin, you have swallowed Labor spin big time. Do a bit of research. The ACC programs that Mark Vaile facilitated in his portfolio of regional development delivered real outcomes in partnership with local organisations. It was a smart way to go and it is well reported in an independent study. Perhaps you may have also noticed major repairs to the Pacific Highway which would NOT have got off the ground without Coalition government funding. I might add the tragic NSW Labor government has money missing from programs, lies and spins on a daily basis and will receive the very harsh judgement from the state electorate next year. With service delivery like these clowns, is it any wonder infrastructure in down the drain all over the state. People are awake to Labor and its so-called "brand" is as hard to sell as out-of-date milk. The Greens are copping ex Labor votes in big licks and Labor is yet to open the pandora's box to the worst campaign in 50 years (Labor pollster Rod Cameron Lateline '08 Sept 10). Enjoy your delusion in the backward quarter of Lyne; we progressive conservatives will hold Oakeshott to account.
Posted by Shambolic, 9/09/2010 5:21:09 PM, on The Land
"Progressive conservatives"?? that would have to be a oxymoron if I have ever heard one. As another Lyne voter I also support Oakeshott. Although his decision isn't my first choice. I think he has decided to put Australia first, mainly because the Libs can't even work with the Nats let alone with indies.
Posted by Farmer Dave, 10/09/2010 11:25:18 AM, on The Land
Farmer Dave, you got the moron part right, in respect of yourself. Get over yourself as the coalition has worked well together. You can think again if you reckon buckshott will get in again around here. He has revealed his inner Labor and now will find out quickly how it is inside the circus that is the illegitimate "government". Anyone that thinks putting a mob in that destroyed its last elected leader is good for Australia is obviously ripe for plucking by merchants of spin and thought bubbles.
Posted by Independentnonsense, 10/09/2010 7:42:30 PM, on The Land
Farmer Dave, you are but one of many who spread the lie that "The Libs can't even work with the Nats" If you are not repeating lies just to vent your hatred of conservatives, please explain how they worked together to deliver twelve years of national prosperty dispite the infrastructure & economic ruin wrought by State Labor governments. I know how they achieved such, but despite my abhorance of their cunning ways I won't be making balls for labor lovers like you to fire at them.
Posted by jock, 10/09/2010 11:12:11 PM, on The Land
Mug$hott sided with the party that was least likely to call an early election (because it would lose). Neither of the "Vichy Independents" would back the LNP because they knew they were more likely to call an early election (because they would win). Mug$hott cannot afford another election so soon and knows perfectly well that he would lose an underfunded campaign in these circumstances. So forget all the spin about national interest and stable government. This is all about his own narrow self interest at the expense of the entire nation.
Posted by Ian Mott, 11/09/2010 11:56:18 AM, on The Land
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Independent MP Rob Oakeshott.
Independent MP Rob Oakeshott.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...