News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Barnaby to talk Spencer down from strike 

Barnaby to talk Spencer down from strike

17 Dec, 2009 01:43 PM
SENATOR Barnaby Joyce will visit the property of Monaro grazier, Peter Spencer, who is showing no signs of ending his hunger strike, which entered its 24th day yesterday, although his health is reportedly deteriorating.

Yesterday, shadow finance minister, Barnaby Joyce, urged Mr Spencer not to harm himself and called on the Prime Minister “as a person of good nature that I know Mr Rudd is” to call Mr Spencer to try to defuse the situation.

“I understand completely and empathise with Mr Spencer’s predicament and the obnoxious arbitrary way that he has been defrauded of his assets,” he said.

“My thoughts first and foremost are for Mr Spencer’s safety and health.”

Mr Spencer remained perched part-way up a 90-metre wind monitoring tower on his property, “Saarahnlee”, Shannons Flat, protesting against the failure of governments to compensate him, and other farmers, for the loss of income through land clearing restrictions, and the officially acknowledged role of the restrictions in ensuring Australia met Kyoto Protocol carbon emission targets.

Mr Spencer has vowed to maintain his vigil until Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, agrees to pay billions of dollars in “just terms” compensation.

Cobar district grazier, Alastair McRobert, who is at “Saarahnlee”, said yesterday Mr Spencer was still firm in his resolve, refusing to eat but drinking.

Mr Rudd, in Copenhagen to attend the climate conference, had not responded and told journalists in Denmark he was not aware of the Spencer protest, (despite the fact The Land emailed his office for a response last week).

Yesterday, shadow finance minister, Barnaby Joyce, urged Mr Spencer not to harm himself and called on the Prime Minister “as a person of good nature that I know Mr Rudd is” to call Mr Spencer to try to defuse the situation.

“I understand completely and empathise with Mr Spencer’s predicament and the obnoxious arbitrary way that he has been defrauded of his assets,” he said.

“My thoughts first and foremost are for Mr Spencer’s safety and health.”

Ironically, Australia has come under attack at Copenhagen, where a negotiator revealed Australia would be looking mainly to changed agricultural practices to meet future carbon emission targets.

The only comment from Government ranks came from member for Eden-Monaro and Parliamentary Secretary for Defence Support and Water, Dr Mike Kelly, who was reported in the Cooma Monaro Express on Tuesday as expressing sympathy for Mr Spencer’s predicament.

Dr Kelly said he had made representations on Mr Spencer’s behalf a number of times but there was little he could do while Mr Spencer remained chained to the wind mast.

“The previous government should have set up a system in the heyday where farmers could be compensated for this sort of thing,” he said.

Dr Kelly said he would like to meet Mr Spencer to discuss Federal Government initiatives such as the red gum and woody grasslands projects, Caring for Our Country and Farming for the Future.

Mr Spencer’s plight is garnering more publicity, including radio interviews and newspaper articles.

Online support group www.sosnews.org, is co-ordinating a support meeting tomorrow at Mr Spencer's property.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
If Peter was a queue jumping economic refugee, Rudd would have been at Peters side in two minutes! Hang in there mate we are all pulling for you!
Posted by tigerdicky, 17/12/2009 7:40:59 AM, on The Land
Peter Spencer's situation highlights what farmers of Australia have to battle for to gain recognition re- land clearing compensation/environmental bureaucrats. Why should a farmer have to go to this extreme, it's a pity that farmer's organisations across Australia show more concern and unite to bring this issue to a close
Posted by angasb, 17/12/2009 1:32:25 PM, on The Land
The struggle of farmers to produce will just be exacerbated if land clearing continues. Trees and biodiversity are all integral in maintaining our environment. We can't keep denuding the land and removing trees as they are part of the system that produces rain and stops soil erosion and absorption of CO2. This man is a victim of over-production and land mismanagement since Colonial times, and of the failure of the ETS that would compensate him for revegetation.
Posted by Milly, 17/12/2009 1:36:49 PM, on The Land
The SMH let the carbon cat out of the bag - Australia has secretly stolen land use rights (property) from farmers and can escape any near future penalty by waving changes of land use = carbon credits. We never needed an ets, we needed to play fair and give some credit to the farmers who belong to their land. Sect 51 of the constitution demands compensation on just terms... Rudd for Labor Pty Ltd doesn't abide by the constitution he ignores it. Abbott for Liberal Pty Ltd ditto. Why vote for a pty ltd? Why does even one man must sacrifice his farm his life for all the Polluting Pty Ltds. Peter's life and livelihood is worth more than a thousand dead stinking pty ltds
Posted by mike says pty ltds steal from farmers, 17/12/2009 1:44:54 PM, on The Land
Milly doesn't get it. Peter Spencer is a victim of theft of his property. Assumming Milly owns something, like a car, jewellery or a house she is obviously quite happy to accept that the Government can take it and give her nothing in return. It surprises me that Milly is not concerned about the theft of her property and there is no payment for this theft. After the enactment of the Australia Act in 1984 we have essentially been a Republic and the states own every piece of land.
Posted by John Michelmore, 17/12/2009 6:18:39 PM, on The Land
Full support for Peter but ironic that a member of the (previous) government that implemented this land rights grab is now extending his hand. Would have been better if the Nationals stood up before this was introduced.
Posted by Farmer Dave, 18/12/2009 5:59:38 AM, on The Land
So Rudd says he was not aware of Peter Spencer's hunger strike even though his office was emailed a week ago. Sure he is a busy man with lots re the Copenhagen summit on his plate. But...this whole situation is central to the topic of the summit. Obviously his minders choose what emails he actually receives to read so once again it is bureaucrats who are running the show, deciding that the failure to compensate rural landowners for the theft of land use rights is a dead issue or a non-issue. Good on you Peter! And thank God or whoever that this issue has now hit the urban press. While rural people especially those on the land are well aware of the plight of many others over this theft (thanks to the various Rural Press outlets) this has largely escaped the media heard/seen by the urban masses. And, regrettably in general the ABC is as much at fault as the commercial media as they have shown no interest in pursuing this issue on Landline, 4 Corners or the 7.30 report over the past several years. Shame!
Posted by green landowner, 18/12/2009 6:22:03 AM, on The Land
Milly, when you say 'We can't keep denuding...' You are obviously a rural landowner in a similar situation to Peter, not an urban dweller with a NIMBY attitude.
Posted by traprock, 18/12/2009 7:29:26 AM, on The Land
Do you really believe that Rudd is not aware of Peter's situation? I don't, blaming the others in the office is convenient but not truthful, Rudd just hasn't had anyone write his reply yet. And blaming previous governments is getting old, apparently Jooolia is blaming them for the strikes all over the country, good try but they are going to have to come up with something more credible - time is up !
Posted by Amused, 18/12/2009 8:51:56 AM, on The Land
Milly it seems that the urban population think that all farmers are denuding their land. There is some denudation (some a result of natural forces) some of which is a result of past government policies which forced landowners to clear leased land or lose it and possibly some due to poor management practices. However, you have totally missed the point of Peter's stand. It is a minority of landowners (but still a large number of people) from whom land use rights have been stolen without any or adequate compensation. This is for a believed community benefit (e.g. meeting Kyoto targets) As such, the landowner who has paid good money to purchase the rural land for agricultural use should be compensated adequately from community (ie. taxes) funds rather than bearing the cost simply because of his/her conservation values. After all, most landowners affected by vegetation management laws are not in a position to be generous philanthropists which this situation has forced them (including Peter Spencer and me) to be.
Posted by green landowner, 18/12/2009 9:16:34 AM, on The Land
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Monaro grazier, Peter Spencer, pictured before the strike, has hit day 24 of his protest against the failure of governments to compensate farmers for the loss of income through land clearing restrictions.
Monaro grazier, Peter Spencer, pictured before the strike, has hit day 24 of his protest against the failure of governments to compensate farmers for the loss of income through land clearing restrictions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
10 December, 2009
16 December, 2009
MULTIMEDIA
15 December, 2009
16 December, 2009
17 December, 2009
POLL
Q: Has your farm business made a profit in 2009?

Yes - profit
(19.8%)

No - loss
(59.3%)

Broke even
(20.9%)

Total Votes: 450
Poll Date: 13 December, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...