News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Windsor seeks urgent change 

Windsor seeks urgent change

03 Nov, 2011 03:00 AM
INDEPENDENT MP Tony Windsor will use his potential support of the Federal Government’s $11 billion mining tax as a carrot to push his private bill giving the Commonwealth the power to override the States’ control of mining leases.

Independent support of the Minerals Resource Rent Tax (MRRT) is crucial for the bill to succeed.

But enough is enough for Mr Windsor, who says things came to a head following news of the stand-off between landowners and coal seam gas (CSG) giant, Santos, at Spring Ridge, on the Liverpool Plains.

“I’ve made it clear to the Government that this sort of nonsense from some of these companies has gone on long enough,” he said.

Protestors want Santos to put the handbrakes on its pilot wells until the Namoi Catchment Water Study is released and its results are properly understood.

Santos says the pilot project will add valuable data to the study.

Mr Windsor says his bill, introduced last month with the support of fellow Independent Rob Oakeshott, would enable the Commonwealth to have control of water resources.

It would enable the Commonwealth to specifically ban any mining action “that has, or will have, or is likely to have a significant impact on the water quality, structural integrity or hydraulic balance of a water resource”.

At present, the Federal Government can only intervene over issues such as threatened species and World Heritage sites, but Mr Windsor says issues such as water should trigger Commonwealth scrutiny of proposed mining projects.

“The State-based process that is currently there is more about a localised impact within the mining area where mining or CSG production is to be undertaken,” Mr Windsor told parliament.

“It does not correctly take into account the potential off-site impacts on groundwater resources and the relationship those resources may have with other groundwater systems.

“The State and federal governments have been complicit in their neglect of proper scientific process on these sensitive lands,” he said.

The MRRT is budgeted to raise $11 billion in the first three years from July 1 next year.

Mr Windsor, who held talks with Prime Minister Julia Gillard on Tuesday, wants the MRRT to provide between $200 and $400 million for environmental assessments of regions earmarked for CSG, and a guarantee that country regions will get their share of MRRT funds.

But the Government has already budgeted for the money to be spent elsewhere.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
What nongs voted for this guy, more red tape, more delayed change to cleaner energy (than coal), more self interest. People have to learn voting for minor parties which include the Greens, is a futile exercise and only serves to cloud the country in uncertainty.
Posted by Pumpkinhead, 3/11/2011 5:29:53 AM, on The Land
Tony Windsor is dead set right in his action. What he is proposing should have been done years ago under COAG Agreements on Water Reforms. Mining/CSG are exempt from Water Reforms

Water Reforms & State Environmental Regulations create a false perception in people that are NOT suffering from mine/CSG impacts that Govts act to properly protect water resources and the wellbeing of affected landholders. They do NOT.


Posted by Heather, 3/11/2011 9:10:34 AM, on The Land
Isn't it interesting here we have Tony promoting the interest of farmers and their future and we have an ex National working for and promoting mining companies over and above the concerns and interests of farmer.

Good on you Tony about time someone has the guts to stand up and give farmers some rights.

Posted by holisticmick, 3/11/2011 9:38:01 AM, on The Land
I have the greatest sympathy for the victims of coal seam gas miners and other victims of mining in general. But you need to take a really long cold shower before anyone hands a whole stack of powers to the Commonwealth.

It may sound like a good idea but you had best keep in mind that what you would be doing is handing even more power to the voters of Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Canberra.

And even though you might, on the face of it, have an invitation to dinner. Do not believe for a single moment that you will not, eventually, end up on the menu instead.

Posted by Ian Mott, 3/11/2011 10:37:44 AM, on The Land
Good on you Tony Windsor - someone needs to inject some sense into this insane grab for dollars at any price !


Posted by Nat, 3/11/2011 2:31:20 PM, on The Land
Pumpkinhead - more like Boofhead.

I am of one the 'nongs' that voted for this guy. At least he is making a move to prevent property theft by stealth. Ever heard of property rights. If govts want the royalties then they should permit these miners to drill on govt land - not private land.

As for clean energy this gas won't be generating one electron of it. NSW generators haven't even started to convert from coal fired to gas fired even if they are thinking about it.

This gas will be sold offshore rather than being kept for our possible future use.

Posted by daw, 3/11/2011 2:55:10 PM, on The Land
Pumpkinhead, I'm afraid you may be the nong in this one. What use is less red tape if what you get at the end of it is poisoned aquifers and toxic soils?

Voting for the major parties will only ensure a business as usual approach as they are the ones most compromised by resource industry political donations.

This kind of crap has been going on long enough. It is time that the state royalty greed is balanced by some consideration of the long term interest.


Posted by Rob in margs, 3/11/2011 6:01:28 PM, on The Land
Tony Windsor is sly.He makes a pledge with one hand,while talking with the enemy with the other hand.His popularity is at on all time low in his electorate,so he now decides to make a effort to represent the small minority that did not vote for him.That is 2% of the people in his seat.Farmers.Tony Windsor gets into power by gaining votes mainly from Armidale,a town in New England full of schools and a university.

Country use to run on the sheeps back.Nothing has changed much,really.The wealth is still coming from the land ,now in the form of mining.

Posted by David, 6/11/2011 8:32:09 PM, on The Land
Windsors &Oakshot's proposed bill bill is about water and control of water not just coal seam gas.

Qld,NSW and NT be afraid. This could allow small Canberra based preassure groups to impose controls over your rivers and underground supplies for some perceoved greater good. Australia's water supplies are in Qld,NT and NSW. I suspect Labour will support the bill as it gives them the control over water they have wanted but were afraid to go after. And their stooges will do it for them.

Posted by Feathers, 11/11/2011 9:10:00 AM, on The Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...