News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 What the 'coal plan' means 

What the 'coal plan' means

17 Mar, 2011 03:00 AM
KEY land will be permanently protected from mining and extraction activities under the Labor Government’s 10-point coal and coal seam gas plan announced this week.

Stakeholders including farmers, Thoroughbred breeders and lobby groups welcomed elements of the policy saying there were several long-overdue initiatives – but NSW Premier, Kristina Keneally, has provoked the ire of some by downplaying prime agricultural land.

In a statement released by the Premier, “prime productive agricultural land” was listed after “valuable industries such as the Hunter wine industry and the Thoroughbred industry”.

NSW Farmers Association president, Charles Armstrong, was quick to slam Labor’s plan, saying it showed little regard for protecting critical agricultural and water resources and did little toward achieving balance between major land uses.

He said the 10-point plan would facilitate a successful coal seam gas (CSG) industry, without any place for the future of food production.

Commitments to initiatives such as exclusion zones, a coal and gas Ombudsman and audit of gas wells and drill sites were more than a decade too late and would not give farmers confidence.

Mr Armstrong said the government had missed opportunities to consult with stakeholders, in stark contrast to the Opposition.

NSW Minerals Council chief executive, Nikki Williams, said voters should be wary of “an election-driven auction of the future of the industry”.

“We are deeply concerned about the proposal to introduce exclusion zones,” she said.

“Decisions must be scientific and evidence-based.”

Caroona Coal Action Group CSG spokeswoman, Rosemary Nankivell, Womboyne, said hydraulic fracturing, or “fraccing”, should be banned - not just BTEX chemicals.

She said Arkansaw in the US banned fraccing on March 3 and New York recently introduced a CSG moratorium.

Mrs Nankivell also questioned how the policies would be implemented, and argued pipelines on travelling stock routes was not ideal.

She also took issue with government assertions the coal industry employed 19,000 people and pointed out agriculture employed 315,000.

“On another note, as a landholder, I object most strongly to paying my LHPA rates to cover TSRs only to find Eastern Star Gas and Santos are drilling exploration holes on them,” she added.

Thoroughbred Breeders of the Hunter Valley spokeswoman, Hellen Georgopoulos, said it was encouraging the government finally recognised the threat posed by mining to the future viability of the industry.

“We also seek the assurances of both parties they will not make decisions on new exploration or mining licences surrounding Thoroughbred breeding operations until these exclusion zones have been introduced,” Ms Georgopoulos said.

The Land requested an interview regarding the newly-released policy with NSW Planning Minister, Tony Kelly, but was told questions would only be answered by email.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The "Coal Plan" article doesn't mention underground water supplies other than indirectly with the reference to fraccing and BTEX usage.

It seems a "no brainer" that protection of underground water should be a primary aim.

Queensland farmers have had a chance to assess this and the anecdotal evidence so far seems to be reasonably negative for CSM extraction.

Perhaps CSM alternatives should now be reconsidered and in particular underground coal gasification and the use of modified syngas to run power stations or gas to liquids be explored. Queensland seems to hav made a big mistake in this area.... perhaps NSW could be cleverer?

But the really big issue will come once AWE et al start fraccing the Perth Basin in effect playing a game of chicken with Perth's water supply.

UCG, GTL are proven technologies with a good record and allow coal supplies to be utilised without damaging water tables etc.

And to put pipelines along the stock-routes would be an act of vandalism. Having travelled them I can tell you they are worth fighting for.

Posted by Sparty, 18/03/2011 10:17:15 AM, on The Land
I think the statements from the Minerals Council are flawed & mislead.

The statement

"an election-driven auction of the future of the industry".

Yes we are ignored when there is no election to force some consideration of the impacts of mining. And it should be remembered that the Minerals Council doesn't elect Governments no matter how much pressure and influence it exerts on them to approve mines.

And the statement: "We are deeply concerned about the proposal to introduce exclusion zones."

The fact there are NO exclusion Zones in place and all areas should be available for mining is VERY DISTURBING to us facing eviction by Mining.

And the statement: "Decisions must be scientific and evidence-based."

What of the science that underpins the Native Vegetation Act and Water Act 2007 that the mining industry is excempted from so they can clear fell thousands of acres of native forrest and rip up & drain aquifers unchallenged.

Or the evidence from all over the world that the particulates and dust from mining cause serious long-term heath issues and impact large populations exposed to them.

The mining industry should take a good hard look in the mirror before making such statements.

Posted by SPARKS, 18/03/2011 2:13:20 PM, on The Land
jobs at risk, another half truth spin the industry throws up in its defence.

Firstly, never has the discussion moved to closing mines. What the problem is that the mines are all expanding (code for speeding up the extraction process).

What this does is shortens the working life of the mines. To cash in on coal now, before it is carbon taxed too highly, so they double the machinery and workforce but halve the life of the pit.

They have created double the jobs but for only half the period.

Then after expiring their mine in half the time they go crying to the State Gov. for more and to dig up, BUT, WAIT FOR IT! They now need a much bigger new area to keep the operation going as they are double the operating size they were in the beginning. There we have the problem an industry that wants to escalate exports by 300pc and rural communities that are destined to be destroyed by this intentional snowball effect.

Tthis doesn't even take account of the permanent destruction of currently fertile farm areas and their water resources. Mining is will eventually eat itself to death but only after it has eaten every thing else in and around the valley.

WAKE UP EVERYONE!!


Posted by SPARKS, 18/03/2011 11:19:37 PM, on The Land
P.P.S.

It doesn't help that the State sold off the long term coal reserves set to feed the power stations in the Hunter for a quick cash sale of an inadequate $330 millionl. This is about as much as the Chinese spent to get the exploration rights only over the Liverpool Plains farmers properties at Quirindi. With the cheap power coal contracts soon to expire

and not having any real reserves on their own they recently went on a fire sale of leases and set up thier own budget mine at Dunnedoo. Why you may ask. Is it because we are running out of Coal? NO! It's because if they can establish more coal production than we have export capacity the excess can't escape overseas as cash income for the coal barons. So to artificially drive the price of coal down they have issued leases anywhere they think they can get away with it regardless of the social and environmental impacts.

What a total mess of mega mismanagement. The state had the coal but sold it for a song and has lost control over the whole industry. King Coal runs them now.

I won't sit silent and allow the total destruction of rural farming areas to sustain this mess.

We need to take back control.

NOW!

Posted by SPARKS, 18/03/2011 11:25:53 PM, on The Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...