News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Warning on danger of building on farmland 

Warning on danger of building on farmland

19 Oct, 2009 05:38 AM
THE State Government's Sydney metropolitan strategy allows 400,000 new homes to be built on prime agricultural land, failing to take into account the impact of climate change and the increased likelihood of inland droughts, a leading landscape architect says.

Adrian McGregor, who with his colleague Philip Coxall is proposing a new way of planning called "biocity", says that the $1 billion worth of vegetables the Sydney basin produces annually is critical to NSW as a food and economic source.

The metropolitan strategy threatens the city's food security and would lead to an increase in vegetable prices, he said.

"The most progressive and forward-thinking cities, like London, are doing work on food security because people realise that with the effects of climate change on rainfall and agricultural production on an increasing population, feeding cities … is going to be one of our biggest global challenges," he said.

His comments follow a NSW Department of Industry and Investment report that predicted more than half of the city's remaining 1050 vegetable farms would be lost when the north-west and south-west growth areas became suburbs over the next two decades.

"Everyone thinks the west of the state has the most valuable agricultural land. It is the reverse. The city does," Mr McGregor said.

Research from 2006 showed that the return from agricultural production in the Sydney basin was $5433 per hectare, dramatically higher than the $136 per hectare for the entire state, he said.

The federal Agriculture Minister, Tony Burke, said last week that the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation had warned that global farm production needs to rise by 70 per cent in 40 years to feed an extra 2.4 billion people.

Mr McGregor said he and colleagues had set up an interactive website, biocitystudio.com, to publicise the concept that metropolises should be planned with a "total system" in mind, including food as one of 12 components that must be in balance with others, such as transport.

"We know we are running out of oil," he said. "We rely on it for cultivating agricultural land, for fertilising, for pesticides, for production and transport. So in that entire chain when fuel costs begin to rise, we are going to see food become less affordable to people in our cities. If we have built upon our productive agricultural areas, we have forever lost the ability to produce cheaper food close to where we live."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The Government should bring more migrants in so that we carve up more valuable farming lands - then we can all starve to death!
Posted by tigerdicky, 19/10/2009 7:30:40 AM, on The Land
Don't worry tigerdicky as they continue their social engineering we won't have any farmers as we need money to farm and with wealth distributation due to ETS for climate change farming will be a luxury Aust no longer can afford and the people with the prime ag houseblock can grow a vegie patch.
Posted by Richie 10, 19/10/2009 3:12:50 PM, on The Land
We can feed people, we just need to be paid to do it.
Posted by rod, 19/10/2009 8:26:05 PM, on The Land
Here here Rod. I get less money for my cattle than I did 20+ years ago.
Posted by High Country Gent, 20/10/2009 6:54:14 AM, on The Land
Rod is right. Losing a few thousand hectares of semi-industrial wasteland on the edge of Sydney won't make any difference to the world's ability to feed itself. A rise in prices paid to farmers would see a dramatic increase in the amount of food produced. Farmers are trying to cut costs wherever possible rather than trying to increase production. Various productivity increases could be made if the producers could afford it.
Posted by Al, 20/10/2009 7:25:10 AM, on The Land
Well said Richie 10 and Rod. We all know the USA support farming appropriately; why is it that this government can't see the light? Our kids in rural areas are now down to 2.5% of all those attending universities and are unable to afford to attend in most cases because of the way we are treated like third world citizens...not beneficial for us or the country. Look at all that fantastic talent going to waste! So sad.
Posted by JoyD, 20/10/2009 8:50:01 AM, on The Land
It makes a lot more sense to be getting more folk back to regional Australia than stacking them up like sardines in the cities. Let's see the rest of the stats on how many farm houses have been shifted or disused over the last 20 years. Pay at least the production costs for your vegies and meat mate, and see how much the farms will produce. How many times have we seen crops ploughed in as they wouldn't pay the freight to market... as for cattle why is the price so low right now if there isn't an oversupply. My grandfather was sending tomatos by rail to Sydney in the 1950s... grown in Queensland without government subsidy... and closer than the US or China...'biocity' in your dreams. Time for a reality check in Australia to prevent these hairbrained ideas influencing governments.
Posted by pepper, 20/10/2009 5:38:54 PM, on The Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...