News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Something in the Hunter air 

Something in the Hunter air

06 Jan, 2011 03:00 AM
GLOUCESTER residents want the newly introduced Upper Hunter Air Quality Monitoring Network expanded to include their region as mining casts an ever larger shadow over their rural haven.

Gloucester Coal has been granted approval to increase production at its Stratford and Duralie mines, with the life of the latter extended by nine years to extract an extra 20 million tonnes of coal.

(Lucas Energy is also seeking to drill up to 90 wells for coal seam gas.)

The increasing visual impact of mining near their homes, and reports suggesting Upper Hunter children are more likely to suffer respiratory problems, has prompted a group of local mums to lobby for their neck of the woods to be included in Upper Hunter air monitoring.

Wendy Fraser, “Glenrowan”, a marine biologist, returned home with her husband, Michael, and son, Andrew, to run the family farm when her father became ill four years ago, and now runs 180 cows on 210 hectares.

They don’t regret the move – but are increasingly worried about their environment.

“We’re all busy, on the farm and with the kids, and barely have time to read the paper, let alone write letters and lobby, so a few of us decided to campaign together,” Mrs Fraser said.

While mines must have PM10 monitors to measure larger particles, there is rising concern about evidence much smaller PM2.5 particles can lodge deep in the lungs.

“The fear, worry and concern in the community is obvious – a lot of it might be unwarranted, but we just don’t know,” Mrs Fraser said.

“Monitoring could put our minds at ease. But if there is a problem, we need to know about it.

“If our children are more susceptible to asthma, we can’t just take them away. If there is a problem with PM2.5 particles, we need to know where it’s coming from to do something about it.”

The group aims to raise funds to set up independent monitoring of air and water quality if the State Government won’t extend the network to their area.

“We want baseline data to use as a point of reference,” Mrs Fraser said.

The air quality monitoring network was set up last year after a flurry of reports suggesting Upper Hunter residents had higher than average respiratory and cardiovascular problems.

Two monitors, at Muswellbrook and Singleton, went live last month, but only three of a planned 14 monitors will measure fine dust (PM2.5) particles.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
What ever controls we can get to keep an eye on these mines we will have but please do not let the Mines be the ones that will check the monitors. They cannot be trusted to operate anything that will show they are doing the wrong thing.
Posted by John the Mayor, 7/01/2011 11:24:37 AM, on The Land
Monitoring air quality around Gloucester township is paramount. PM2.5 air quality monitoring should begin now in order to gain results before Gloucester Resources Ltd submit a Development Application to mine within 5kms of the township.

GRL are monitoring PM10 only, which is required by the State Government whilst PM2.5 particulates are not and are more damaging to human health.

What is annoying is when mining companies say Occupational Health and Safety Standards for their workers in mines are now very stringent, nothing is done about the towns folk who live close to mines and are continually being exposed to these damaging particulates?

Will the Liberal Coalition call for standard PM1 and PM2.5 air monitoring as well as reassessing where future mines should not be allowed?

Posted by Lifestyle, 11/01/2011 8:48:09 AM, on The Land
The NSW Govt should pay and install the air monitoring devices if they really cared about their citizens.

Coal dust is not something that should be ignored and neither should its effects on peoples health.

What happens when all the coal is removed and NSW is left with a legacy of health issues, sinking ground, toxic water and toxic dumps?

Where is the long term benefit for NSW residents?

Isn't it time we stopped being treated as a third world country by overseas mining interests?

It is time for NSW to get some strong caring and intelligent leadership, and replace the shambles that passes for a government.

Posted by davidv, 11/01/2011 2:00:21 PM, on The Land
Congratulations to Wendy and her group of mums for highlighting their babies and young children are particularly sensitive to mining poisons.

Neither the government nor the mines screen their neighbours to see who will be particularly at risk of damage or tell them what could reduce the health risks.

All mining communities need an initial health screen and then enhanced monitoring, not just Singleton and Muswellbrook.

The criteria for consent of mining should be based on the risks being posed to the local community not on industrial expediency. (Many people think the mining consent criteria are safety levels but for some substances such as lead there is no safe level for small children.)

Without screening each community you don't know the risks that are being taken. Certainly in a populated area like Gloucester Valley about 1000 people are in the potential damage zone.

To my mind this is an unacceptable risk.

What level of risk do the government think is acceptable?

Posted by steve robinson, 11/01/2011 4:49:45 PM, on The Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Wendy Fraser (pictured with her son Andrew, 2), Margo Cameron (with Alby, 11/2), and Melissa Seal (with daughters, Anna-Rose, 51/2 and Abbey, 4) are concerned about air quality and the potential effects on their children’s health from mine developments around Gloucester.
Wendy Fraser (pictured with her son Andrew, 2), Margo Cameron (with Alby, 11/2), and Melissa Seal (with daughters, Anna-Rose, 51/2 and Abbey, 4) are concerned about air quality and the potential effects on their children’s health from mine developments around Gloucester.

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...