News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Senate backs mining ban on Liverpool Plains 

Senate backs mining ban on Liverpool Plains

02 Dec, 2009 06:11 AM
THE NSW Government should investigate a total ban on mining under the Liverpool Plains food bowl and other areas where floodplains or aquifers are crucial to growing food, a parliamentary inquiry in Canberra has found.

"As the driest inhabited continent on earth, with only an estimated six per cent of arable land across Australia, the preservation of these productive lands and finite water systems is clearly of national significance," the Senate's select committee on agriculture, which has been studying food production nationwide, reported.

The committee, chaired by the Liberal senator Bill Heffernan, also expressed concern about gas exploration and drilling in the Gunnedah Basin, saying it could damage aquifers connected to the Great Artesian Basin, among others.

"The importance of water security was emphasised during the inquiry," it reported.

"The committee notes that the NSW Mining Act does not explicitly recognise the impact of water resources in the granting of exploration licences."

It concluded the companies involved should "make a clear commitment that mining of any form or type should not take place on the floodplains".

The findings are a boost for farmers who have campaigned in part with a 16-month blockade to stop mining after BHP Billiton and Shenhua, owned by the Chinese government, were granted exploration licences on the Liverpool Plains and Santos gained approval to explore for gas in Gunnedah.

A spokesman for the Caroona Coal Action Group, Tim Duddy, said: "We think exploration is currently damaging the water sources of the region. So we are concerned that if development occurs … it has to be appropriate and not ruin one of the richest agricultural regions of Australia."

But the NSW Minister for Mineral Resources, Peter Primrose, rejected the call for a prohibition on mining yesterday.

"It would be premature to simply ban mining without all the facts - local families and business would be hard hit by an uninformed knee-jerk ban," said his spokeswoman, Jenny Ward.

She said exploration licences were not approvals to mine, and strict environmental protection conditions would ensure any impact was temporary.

The NSW Minister for Primary Industries, Tony Kelly, will consider the report.

Miners and farmers are awaiting a judgment in the NSW Land and Environment Court over a challenge by the Caroona group against the licence the State Government granted to BHP Billiton.

Primary producers and miners will also shape up in the NSW Supreme Court in early February when a farmer, Geoff Brown, and his colleagues argue their appeal against a decision in a lower court confirming BHP's right to enter their land to explore for coal.

The NSW Minerals Council rejected the call for a mining prohibition, saying its industry contributed $1.2 billion a year in royalty payments to the state.

"The suggestion of a blanket ban on mining before there is a study goes against the science and the wider community's right to enjoy the benefits from mining," it said in a statement.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Ohhh Peter Primrose. We get a change in personality but not in ideas. What a pity that you find yourself trapped by fossilised thinking. Mine where it is in Australian's long-term interest - not in the interests of a quick buck and keeping the coal lobby happy. Drop the idea that somehow coal is good business and good for Australia's rural communities. There are much richer options for the government and the community and the environment. The coal companies know it but are pushing just as hard as they can to keep us hooked and wheeling out the asme arguments that the cigarette companies used 30 years ago - no difference. Give farmers and food a go. Since we must mine while we transition, mine in places where this is no conflicting community needs and desires. Remember they are mining for PROFITS - not to keep jobs, not to supply Australia with the best energy.
Posted by soldout, 2/12/2009 7:39:43 PM, on The Land
One of the interesting submissions to the Senate Committee was from Shenhua Watermark Coal Ltd. They say they have abided by all the criteria regarding the Part 3A regulations and the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, etc of the areas covered by their exploration licences. There is an interesting and quite disturbing paragraph under the heading 'Land Access' which reads: 'Shenhua has agreements with private landholders holders allowing access...and has reached agreement with NSW Forests for access for prospecting to some 2000 hectares of the Breeza State Forest.' How can this happen? It would be interesting to see the overseas reaction to coal exploration happeninig in the Heritage listed Barrington Tops National Park. We would have demonstrators clambering over each other to stop such a traversty! But for the Breeza State Forest, who cares? I do and many more would too, if they knew. Minister Keneally, what is your policy on exploration/mining in State Forests? I know the answer. "They are just exploring and if a submission for a mine to go ahead is presented, they have to meet all the criteria as set out by the ....blah blah blah etc. etc. Weezle words.
Posted by Aussie, 3/12/2009 8:11:01 AM, on The Land
If mining is so safe to the enviroment, why not mine some of the coal that is under our national parks (72%of coal in NSW is there)? It could be long wall mined and most of our national parks do not have large underground water in abundance in them. It would leave a large ugly hole in the ground and would fill the air with dust.
Posted by Jim Gunn, 3/12/2009 8:16:17 AM, on The Land
Mining has already been under much of the Wollemi National Park through the back of Bulga and Jerrys Plains. Some longwall extraction had to stop due to the Wollemi Pine being above one such active mining area. Jim, as for our national parks not having a great abundance of water under them???? The Great Dividing Range of the east coast of Australia is one of the largest sources of fresh groundwater in NSW, even in the middle of droughts you can climb and hike down into canyons that are like being in the bowels of the earth. Most of these canyons always run and have the freshest water you will find, filtered through millions of years of sandstone deposits. Without these groundwater sources kiss bye bye to much of the baseflow of our major creeks and rivers stemming from these amazing mountain areas. We talk of rainfall induced droughts, how about mining induced droughts, when these beautiful freshwater sources dissapear underground into mine workings becoming saline and useless!!
Posted by alreadydone, 8/12/2009 2:57:04 PM, on The Land
Indeed Ms Jenny Ward it would be premature to mine without all the facts. What intrigues me is the part of the statement '...local families and business would be hard hit by an uninformed knee jerk ban'. What an absolute load of bovine excreta! The families and businesses have been there for all these decades, founded on agriculture. Why for one moment would one even ponder the question of them being 'hard hit' by something that has not started yet? Goodness me I despair that people like her are being payed for with taxpayer dollars.
Posted by daw, 24/03/2010 3:02:12 PM, on The Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...