News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Scientists unite over rivers management 

Scientists unite over rivers management

11 Mar, 2010 10:36 AM
THIRTY-THREE of Australia's top scientists have formed a united front over reform of the Murray-Darling river system, calling for environmental outcomes to be given priority in the imminent ''basin plan''.

Despite states such as Victoria calling for the river to be managed in a way that equally weighs social, economic and environmental needs, the scientists called for the new plan to be measured on ''ecological targets''.

''This is necessary because ecosystems provide fundamental support for the economy, and not vice-versa,'' the scientists said.

The manifesto is signed by many of the nation's top environmental scientists, including Professor Richard Kingsford, of the University of NSW.

But farmer organisations are ringing alarm bells about the plan, which National Farmers Federation president, David Crombie, has branded “a train smash waiting to happen”.

He said months of discussion with the Federal Government and the Murray-Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) suggested the plan would “decimate” agriculture in the basin.

NSW Farmers Association president, Charles Armstrong, has chipped in, claiming farmers and regional communities have been effectively shut out of discussions about the plan, with potentially “devastating” results.

He wants the draft plan, due in four months, to be deferred until the requirements of the Water Act 2007 could be met.

Mr Armstrong said the rush to complete a draft plan to the Government’s deadline meant critical input from the farming sector was missing.

“Yes, they’ve done some preliminary consultation, but there has been no opportunity for detailed technical analysis of social, economic and structural factors.”

He said a shift away from agriculture would be very hard to reverse and would have untold repercussions on Australia’s ability to feed its own population and meet the increasing food and fibre demands of the world.

A draft plan for future management of the river - including new limits on water extraction - will be released in coming months. Among a list of nine recommendations, the scientists said the river's environmental assets - such as the Barmah redgum forest - should not be seen as isolated sites, but instead as assets that were inextricably connected to the rest of the river.

The release of the scientists' manifesto today comes as federal Water Minister Penny Wong turned up the heat on Opposition Leader Tony Abbott over the Murray River system and, specifically, Victoria's contentious north-south pipeline.

Victorian Liberal and National Party MPs this week will try to cancel the pipe's right to take water to Melbourne, and the Rudd government called on Mr Abbott to pull his political allies into line.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
As a very concerned farmer because we know this will be rushed through with little to no consultation with the quiet members of the farming community who are out there really managing their properties building natural capital and achieving high production levels. Conversation and production CAN go hand in hand. Through No Till No Kill pasture cropping we can build the health of our soils and with appropriate rotational grazing we can increase the function of our grazing country.
Posted by concerned, 12/03/2010 9:49:50 AM, on The Land
Do these farmers' organisations live on another planet? On this planet, life depends on a healthy environment. They talk about not being able to feed Australia's population. We would have a much better chance of doing that if water was used for food, not cotton, if water was not wasted on MIS grape fields resulting in grape gluts, if dairy cows fed on rain-fed NSW coastal grass rather than grass irrigated by Murray River water, and if water was not wasted on flooding rice paddies. There is so much wastage in the current system - it must stop.
Posted by Barney, 12/03/2010 9:56:05 AM, on The Land
Anything that Richard Kingsford is involved with makes me immediately suspicious. He's never seen a plan for a national park that he doesn't like or a bird that isn't endangered.
Posted by dickytiger, 12/03/2010 11:58:02 AM, on The Land
There would be ample water for both farming and environment if capital city idiots like Brumby, Bligh and Keneally didn't keep swiping water out of other basins so capital city mug punters can hose the drought dust off their driveways. Urban dwellings could have rainwater tanks to flush dunnies and do laundry instead of piping water from distant basins. Then they could extract as much pure water as they want from the waste water, and turn the rest into fertiliser. Urban water demand would be cut by 55-60% by these two measures alone. The other big waster of water is coal-fired power. It is ridiculous that, in a water-constrained nation like Australia, so much useful water is lost via the cooling towers. Even if we weren't worried about CO2 emissions, we ought to be encouraging wind and solar power so as to leave more water on the land, where it can do some good.
Posted by David_FTA, 12/03/2010 3:16:06 PM, on The Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...