News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Mining policy 'driven by bureaucrats' 

Mining policy 'driven by bureaucrats'

12 Oct, 2011 05:23 PM
THE state’s peak farming body has fired a shot across the bow of the Coalition Government, saying unequivocally that it cannot support policies and proposed legislation on agriculture and mining in their current form.

NSW Farmers Association President, Fiona Simson, who sits on the Government’s stakeholder reference group, convened to progress strategic land use policy, said “this process is being driven by Department of Planning bureaucrats”.

A leaked document from the group revealed NSW Farmers questioned the worth of the stakeholder group, believed the agricultural impact guidelines were “entirely inconsistent” with previous commitments made, and the aquifer interference policy needed “wholesale changes” to gain the support of NSW Farmers.

Ms Simson said she wasn’t surprised the document was made public as NSW Farmers had insisted on having its position statement in the minutes of a recent meeting.

She said NSW Farmers was not the only stakeholder unhappy with progress.

“In my opinion, there are many stakeholders dissatisfied and concerned about this process.

“We are about balance and we participate in good faith, and I have strongly defended the reference group and believed in it – but the devil is in the detail,” she said.

Ms Simson called on the Coalition to step forward and ensure that its pre-election commitments were fully delivered, saying it promised a transparent and robust way forward.

Stakeholders were given a narrow window on which to comment on critical policy documents, and felt that there was little consultation.

And NSW Farmers would not support a proposed ‘gateway process’ for identifying agricultural land.

“It is this new thing they have dreamed up, meant to be for deciding whether mining can occur on a piece of land, but it does not kick in until after the exploration phase, there are no socio-economic features, it is only predicated on biophysical features, and there is no consideration cumulative impacts or the capacity of the region,” Ms Simson said.

“This process is being driven by the department of planning and the government needs to take control – cabinet and ministers must intervene to ensure that promises are met.”

“The government needs to say, we made this policy, now let’s adhere to it and get balance back into it. At the moment, it is not working.”

The stakeholders reference group includes the Association of Mining Related Councils, the Total Environment Centre, the NSW Aboriginal Land Council, the NSW Minerals Council, the Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association, the Construction Forestry Mining Energy Union, the Nature Conservation Council of NSW, the NSW Irrigators Council, the Hunter Valley Wine Industry Association, and Thoroughbred Breeders of the Hunter Valley.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Potentially impacted farmers (and their independent experts) drawn into consultation about mining MUST be PROPERLY empowered in decision making, if the processes are to be genuine.

In the East End Mine Action Group's wide experience "Consultation" is a charade engaged in by Governments who adopt the philisophy that the end justfies the means.

Government are beneficiaries (through royalties etc) in locating projects. Bureaucrats are required to implement Govt Policy. Thus "Consultation" has predetermined outcomes.

Posted by Heather, 12/10/2011 7:45:36 PM, on The Land
Terrific, this is not the only area bureaucrats are out of control. NLIS and control of LHPA's for starters. Local Council LEP's and of course the daddy (mummy I suppose with Juliar ) of them all Carbon Trading.
Posted by John Niven, 13/10/2011 6:12:55 AM, on The Land
This is the same Dpt of Planning that has recommended that the preservation orders on the Wallaby Scrub road and the preserved forest area that was part of the Warkworth Mine approval buffer can now be ignored and the area mined and the road closed. The residences can go and the villiage of Bulga can die as far as they care, so long as they get the royalties.

Nothing these people say or even sign agreements to can be trusted. They here again are avoiding any form of due dilligence in the formulation of mining just trying to keep the bad old cowboy ways by another name, they are a disgrace.

Posted by Liesandmorelies, 13/10/2011 7:47:29 AM, on The Land
I think of all the departments, this was the one everyone expected to get 'cleaned out'. Weren't its prior actions the main reason for the landslide to the Coalition at the last election? Even the Planning Assessment Commission is the same structure with same appointees by the last government. What is the Coalition government waiting for?
Posted by Jacqui Kirkby, 13/10/2011 1:58:42 PM, on The Land
Well said Jacqui. The Coalition have turned out to be so disappointing in Government compared to what they told us all they were going to do while in opposition. I just keep thinking that their heads are still up in the clouds from the massive win they had and if they had just scraped in then things may be different.
Posted by Usedup, 14/10/2011 9:22:46 PM, on The Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Fiona Simson.
Fiona Simson.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...