News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Locusts spark chemical stand-off with organic farmers 

Locusts spark chemical stand-off with organic farmers

27 Jul, 2009 03:48 PM
HUNDREDS of NSW farmers will be asked this week to make a stand against producers who say no to chemicals.

This follows a stand-off between neighbouring properties over locust spraying on a wheat farm in the state's south.

Representatives of Ardlethan district near Wagga Wagga will put a motion to the NSW Farmers Association conference in Sydney, calling for measures to ensure conventional farmers do not suffer financially because of organic neighbours.

"Conventional farmers are happy to live side by side with organic farmers but it shouldn't be at their cost," Ardlethan District Council chairman Kathy Maslin said.

Association president Jock Laurie said conflicts about use of fertilisers, spray drift and pest control occur because normal business practices on farms are "in many ways contrary" to organic methods.

The motion calls for organic status to be granted only if all neighbours are informed first, and for spray buffer zones to be located inside organic farms and not required of their conventional neighbours. The motion stems from an incident last year at Kamarah, near Ardlethan.

Bradley Richens was told by his organic farming neighbours, Helen and Laurence Taylor, that he could not spray chemicals to kill locusts that were invading his property and he should check with their registration organisation, Australian Certified Organic, before acting.

"When I rang the organic association, all they give you is guidelines - I couldn't enter their property, I couldn't spray any chemical," he said.

Mr Richens did spray the insects for two weeks. He said he had never previously been told the Taylors' farm was organic.

There have been large payouts in some cases where farms have been contaminated by neighbours' activities, leading them to lose their organic certification, the chief executive officer of Biological Farmers of Australia, Andrew Monk, said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Sparaying and fertilising practices which result in spill and drift of the chemicals onto the neighbours' properties are prohibited by law. This should make no difference if your neighbour is organic or not - spray, but keep your chemicals within your boundaries. The neigbour maybe using the different poison and they may interfere in an unpredictable way. I guess this push will be a good test for BFA - can they stand up for their members or is all they are good at is just collecting the membership fees?
Posted by Andrew, 28/07/2009 7:34:35 AM, on The Land
There is a safe non-toxic biological spray that controls grasshoppers. Why not use that instead of the toxic chemical? Those complaining may get an insight of the impact of the contamination from neighbours growing GMOs. Time to experience the "boot on the other foot"! Why don't these toxic rescue farmers make as much noise about GMO contamination?
Posted by ggwagga, 28/07/2009 7:58:06 AM, on The Land
Simmer down neighbours, there's always a way round these problems. This from an Australian government DAFF website: “In the late 1990s the rise in organic farming, and in particular organic beef production, was a major concern for the APLC. If they weren’t able to spray pesticides on these farms they would be unable to stop locusts from migrating. The CSIRO then developed a biological control agent for spraying. Metarhizium is a naturally occurring Australian fungus that will infect and kill locusts and does not affect anything else in the environment. The fungus spores are mixed with special spray oil so they can be applied from the air the commercial product is known as ‘green guard’. During the 2000–2001 control season, the APLC conducted the first operational use of metarhizium in the world. The trial was successful, and the APLC now uses the bio-pesticide on certified organic farms and in environmentally sensitive areas.”
Posted by John Newton, 28/07/2009 8:35:50 AM, on The Land
The issue here is the organic farmers duty of care to his neighbours to take all reasonable and practical steps to combat locusts while they are on his property. There are two kinds of "organic" farms, the real ones under serious management and neglected prickle farms masquerading as organic enterprises. The bio control agent mentioned by John Newton above makes it clear that there is no excuse for any organic farmer not doing his best to combat a locust plague, in discharge of the same duty of care accepted by all other farmers. Mainstream farmers have every right to demand a lawful mechanism that will allow them to take timely, cross boundary, action when it is obvious that an organic farmer, or indeed, any other farmer, is likely to breach his duty of care. And that mechanism should include indemnity from prosecution and full recovery of costs involved in carrying someone else's load. It should also be recognised that the much touted success of organic farming is highly dependent on them being protected by very large surrounding chemical farming buffers. Switch the whole district to organic farming and it would be a much sadder story.
Posted by Ian Mott, 28/07/2009 10:05:39 AM, on The Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
27 July, 2009
26 July, 2009
POLL
Q: Has the Federal Government got the balance right between water buybacks and investment in more efficient irrigation infrastructure in the Murray Darling?

Yes
(3.8%)

No - there should be more investment in infrastructure
(73.8%)

No - there should be more emphasis on water buybacks
(13.7%)

Undecided
(8.7%)

Total Votes: 416
Poll Date: 26 July, 2009
BLOGS
22 July, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...