News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Land security vital: NSW Farmers 

Land security vital: NSW Farmers

30 Jul, 2008 10:57 AM
The NSW Farmers' Association is strongly opposing the State Government's intentions to make it much easier for Government and Councils to compulsory resume privately owned land for other than essential services such as roads, rail lines and telecommunications.

Speaking at the Association's annual conference in Sydney yesterday, NSW Farmers' president Jock Laurie says as a landholder, farmers should have the security of knowing that the land they inhabit is not at risk of being taken from them without undue cause.

"The structure of many farms also means that compulsory acquisition of parcels of land could render the property unviable or disaggregated to the extent that they are unworkable," Mr Laurie said.

"It's recognised that key community infrastructure requirements may need such powers, however concern arises when commercial ventures and planning proposals that are open to influence utilise such powers for the benefit of one party over the other.

"Proper consultation processes, open negotiation and independent assessment of the value of such projects must be in place to ensure appropriate decisions are made."

Mr Laurie says a lack of security of tenure also affects a landholder's piece of mind, business planning and financial position.

Under the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 any authority of the State which includes Ministers, local councils, or statutory body has the power to acquire land by a compulsory process

"There are considered beliefs that projects such as wind farms in western NSW and other areas of the state may instigate the operation of these powers, with Local Governments implementing the powers to benefit themselves at the cost to the landholder," Mr Laurie said.

"This is untenable, and we are seeking a commitment from the Government that it will not be the case."

Farmers also voted today to oppose the blanket refusal of some Councils to allow the conversion of reserve roads to private ownership.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Jock Laurie needs something more concrete than a "commitment" from the State Govt not to resume land for commercial (Coal Mining) purposes. That commitment will be thrown out the door as soon as a mining company starts dangling the prospect of new jobs and mining royalties in the treasurers face. Never-the-less, he is doing the right thing raising the issue at this time. I hope he keeps up the pressure.
Posted by Trugger, 31/07/2008 4:42:35 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Did you support the striking truck drivers?

Yes - they need fairer conditions
(80.7%)

No - they have disrupted business
(12%)

Undecided - more information needed
(7.3%)

Total Votes: 777
Poll Date: 28 July, 2008

Most popular articles




The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...