News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Gunning for funds 

Gunning for funds

06 Dec, 2009 04:00 AM
The backlog for roads infrastructure works in Upper Lachlan Shire is so great the council is now asking ratepayers to support a rates increase.

Mayor, John Shaw, Gunning, said it was a problem across the State and times were tough, but council believed it needed to take action now before the condition of roads decreased further.

“We’ve asked our residents if they’d support a five per cent over five years above rate pegging,” he said.

Councillor Shaw said if residents supported it, council would then apply to the State Government for permission for a rate variation.

While ratepayers were still having their say, Cr Shaw said early indications were 60 to 40 against the move.

“Generally people don’t like to see councils asking for more money,” he said.

The shire of 7500 square kilometres includes 11 villages and many roads.

Cr Shaw said the north of the shire had the worst roads infrastructure, with a lot of no through roads that were long and sparsley populated.

Maintenance of gravel roads was the biggest issue, as the council was falling behind on gravel re-sheeting.

Cr Shaw said regional roads, funded in partnership with the State Government, also needed work, and while road maintenance was an issue for council, he didn’t think it had caused any accidents to date.

Upper Lachlan Shire Council expects it will have heard from most of its ratepayers by today about its question on rates increases.

Cr Shaw said the application to increase rates would be discussed at the next council meeting.

More on the road funding crisis in The Land, December 3.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
As a landowner at Gunning, I rue the amalgamation of the former Gunning and Crookwell shires into Upper Lachlan that occurred a few years ago. If Upper Lachlan Council can't manage its budget, it should be abolished. The former Gunning Shire should have been merged with Yass Council, with which it has more in common anyway.
Posted by Brando, 7/12/2009 10:53:14 AM, on The Land
Since the inception of the Upper Lachlan Shire Council (SuperShire), we have had less services and more costs. Council staff need to review their wastage first - how many cars are provided by ratepayers, how many are involved in MVA causing significant costs and loss of value. Council needs to explain why they have spent so much in such a short time, leaving so many ratepayers lacking in facilities but paying higher rates each year. DO NOT SUPPORT THE INCREASE IN RATES - NO MATTER WHAT THE SOB STORY COUNCIL GIVES - it is a matter of bad management.
Posted by Upper Lachlan Ratepayer, 7/12/2009 11:25:39 AM, on The Land
I do agree with the comments above - the concept of service to the ratepayers by Upper Lachlan Council seems to have gone by the board in these days of corporate governance. Council staff seem only to exist to serve their own interests, certainly not those of ratepayers. Ratepayers disagreeing with Council staff are subject to bullying tactics by those staff. NO RATE INCREASE!
Posted by Upper Lachlan Ratepayer, 18/12/2009 8:26:57 AM, on The Land
The management of the ULSC is a disgrace - too much spent on administration and nothing on roads. Why does the general manger need to drive a luxury vehicle and carry a Blackberry etc when ratyepayers can't get their roads graded once a year? The only people ULSC is intereseted in is themselves. I note the road outside GM John Bell's property was sealed at considerable cost.
Posted by Mal, 11/01/2010 12:56:20 PM, on The Land
I agree with Mal. Too may staff too many cars for staff etc. How many admin and planning staff do you need for such a small shire. The GM needs to be replaced with a professional local government administrator. This is no job for a farmer.
Posted by Paul, 11/01/2010 1:45:34 PM, on The Land
Thanks to Mal for emailing me this article. I agree NO RATE INCREASE! The Upper Lachlan Council wastes too much money on unnecessary staff. The cost of legal fees for "fighting" ratepayers over minor issues is incredible. Mr sister works at Council offices and tells stories of waste on legal fees, cars and travel and council lunches etc. Tighten the belt before asking the ratepayers for more money
Posted by Susan, 11/01/2010 2:01:13 PM, on The Land
Thanks for the article Mal. I agree NO RATE INCREASE. Since the (SuperShire) our rates have increased 80% and the services are non existant. Over here at Collector the tip is only open half a day per week. 10-3 most Sundays. The grader has not been spotted for two years, however the Cullerin Road at Breadalbane where the General Manager John Bell lives has been resealed? The ratio of admin staff to ratepayers is too high. There are some 60 admin staff at Crookwell, however, the average ratepayer outside crookwell has never visited the shire office. Who do they look after? Why can't they close the Gunning Office? Why duplicate "services"?
Posted by Irene, 11/01/2010 2:41:05 PM, on The Land
Problem is that you can not attract quality staff to Crookwell, skilled professionals would not wish to live there. Therefore we are stuck with old Council staff who are overdue for the pension, could not care less about their jobs and have no management skills whatsoever. We need to attract a professional General Manager from a city who can turn the Council around and manage its fiscal policy in a more responsible manner. JB might be a nice guy, however, he is asleep at the wheel.
Posted by Jeff, 12/01/2010 8:34:53 AM, on The Land
Could not agree more with most of the comments above regarding ULSC administration. I especially agree with the comment "Ratepayers disagreeing with Council staff are subject to bullying tactics by those staff". We need to replace the General Manager ASAP.
Posted by Jenny, 12/01/2010 11:21:26 AM, on The Land
Thanks for the link Mal. This is an interesting discussion. Have a look at the financial statement. Their income from levies and charges has significantly inceased, however there is no service whatsoever. They always apear to be in dispute with ratepayers. $8,000,000 on wages is far too much for such as small council. I agree that John Bell has to go. Need a professional manager.
Posted by Rodney, 12/01/2010 12:18:34 PM, on The Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Lachlan Shire mayor,, John Shaw, Gunning.
Lachlan Shire mayor,, John Shaw, Gunning.

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...