News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Green group battles Mudgee mine expansion 

Green group battles Mudgee mine expansion

09 Jun, 2011 04:00 AM
AN ENVIRONMENTAL organisation has initiated a court challenge against NSW Government approval for expansion of Xstrata’s Ulan coal mine, near Mudgee, on the grounds it would significantly increase greenhouse gas emissions.

The organisation, the Hunter Environmental Lobby (HEL) and supporters from Sydney are also contesting the impact of the mine’s expansion on groundwater systems and on biodiversity.

Their action throws the gauntlet down over the whole issue of the contradictions inherent in NSW’s continued exploitation of coal in the face of concern about the impact of coal-fired electricity generation on greenhouse gas emissions and global warming.

Approval for the expansion was granted last November by former NSW Planning Minister, Tony Kelly, who this week announced he would resign from the Legislative Council to spend more time with his family.

HEL president, Jan Davis, said Xstrata planned to double its production from the mine to 20 million tonnes a year over 10 years.

She said the resulting addition of a further 575 million tonnes of carbon into the atmosphere would speed up climate change.

“Companies the size of Xstrata have the resources to move towards more environmentally safe activities”.

HEL spokesperson, Bev Smiles, said Xstrata’s own studies showed groundwater systems would take up to 200 years to recover.

She said also the company would need to clear areas of the endangered grassy white box woodland for the mine expansion.

“If it was a farmer there is no way in the world they would be given approval to clear.”

In a brief statement Ulan Coal said: “We take our responsibility for the management of the environment and mining operations seriously and have transparently outlined to all relevant authorities our groundwater, ecological and greenhouse gas management strategies throughout each stage of the application process”.

Hearing of the case in the NSW Land and Environment Court began this week.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I understand the complexity of the situation but CO2 emissions from a new Xstrata coal mine has to be added to a TOTAL amount of GLOBAL CO2 Emissions if this case is to be fair.

To suggest these low local levels are responsible for climate change is inaccurate & wrong.

Climate change is a GLOBAL phenomenon and NOT a local problem that anyone in Australia should be concerned about.

If one could put ALL OF AUSTRALIA'S CO2s emissions together - the amount would only be 0.7% of the global problem that Hunter Environmental Lobby is talking about - an amount that is insignificant in THIS CASE.

Posted by TK421, 12/06/2011 7:53:54 PM, on The Land
Correction I am sorry - the actual total for Australia's CO2 emissions is:

1.35%

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions

So - if you average it out the one coal mine in Mudgee is totally insignificant.

If we banned cattle production in comparison - the cattle in the area of Mudgee would produce more methane and CO2 emissions than the coal mine ever could.

Fair is fair - coal mining is not the same as having a power station... ...just because we dig it out of the ground we are not causing the emission.

Xandro

North Parramatta

Posted by TK421, 13/06/2011 10:58:34 AM, on The Land
@TK421, Most od us opposing the rape of this land and it non recoverable destruction see the Carbon arguments important but not as imortant as the local ones. What pecentage of the local area is to mined and forever trashed, how many local farmimng families will be driven of their land with the knowledge that the landscape they love and leave in the hands of off shore mining conglomerates will be ripped apart and forever only good fore growing anti-erossion grasses & wattle tree rows to hide the destruction. Judged at a local level the impacts are vast & non repairable.
Posted by SPARKS, 20/06/2011 11:23:13 PM, on The Land
P.S. The process of digging it up DOES create an impact, . It takes a lot of land, water & dirty energy to get coal out of the ground it then releases all the Methane gas trapped in it (24 times worse than CO²) it constantly oxidises or spontaniously combusts, more CO² & this is even before the diesel trains haul it hundreds of klms to oil powered ships that take it o/seas for more train trips then burnt. All this doesn't take into account the electricity & Billions of litres of Diesel burnt mining it.

King Coal's a false future, here for a short, dirty, good time. What's the plan then?

Posted by SPARKS, 20/06/2011 11:35:37 PM, on The Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...