News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 'Get out of the way' of ETS, Combet tells Nats 

'Get out of the way' of ETS, Combet tells Nats

28 Oct, 2009 02:02 PM
Climate change and emiissions trading sceptics have been urged to "get out of the way" by Greg Combet, who told an international gathering yesterday that the dragging Australian political debate is risking the nation's international competitiveness.

"Whether people believe in climate change is real or not, they cannot allow Australia to become irrelevant as the global economy and our competitors move to a low pollution future," Mr Combet, the Minister Assisting the Minister for Climate Change, told the CarbonExpo 2009 conference on the Gold Coast.

"Senator Barnaby Joyce I think is being grossly irresponsible in a lot of the commentary he has engaged in.

"It’s time for the sceptics … if they don’t want to be part of it, to just get out of the way and allow this major reform to be properly formulated through a good-faith negotiation."

Earlier in his speech, Mr Combet was positive about the "good faith" negotiation now underway between the government and opposition Climate Change spokesman Ian Macfarlane, although he would not be drawn on possible outcomes like agriculture’s exclusion from the CPRS.

Given a policy framework that encourages innovation and investment in "clean technology, low-carbon services and adaptive know-how" Australia could become a centre of global excellence in low-carbon technologies, Mr Combet said.

"That's why I think it's negligent for those who don't believe in climate change to use the cost of acting as an excuse to delay acting," he said.

"Those who oppose this course of action are bogging Australia down in a debate that leaves us behind and risks our potential to take advantage of new the opportunities that can lock in our prosperity for the future."

Senator Joyce responded that Mr Combet "has a very myopic and naive view of economics if he believes that a new overhead is anything more than a mechanism to destroy an economy, rather than lead an economy".

He mocked the government's ambition to be a global leader in emissions legislation.

"Does Mr Rudd believe that in the middle of the night, Barack Obama rolls over and taps Michelle on the shoulder and says, 'I just can't sleep because of Kevin's position on global warming'?"

If Australia wants carbon abatement, Senator Joyce said, rather than a "massive tax" the government should be considering Nationals-supported initiatives like nuclear power, shifting transport from road to rail, biofuels policy and zonal taxation.

However, few of the 700 delegates from 20 countries at CarbonExpo, an Asia-Pacific gathering on the business of emissions trading, will share Senator Joyce’s view.

The most-aired view was a mix of frustration that the legislative environment for domestic emissions trading is still not settled, and hope that it all will be clear in November; bearing out Mr Combet's contention that all that nation's major business groups "want to see the job done".

"Business leaders are clear and unequivocal in saying, for heavens sake, we know this reform is coming, let's get it setled so we can get on with business," Mr Combet said.

"There's a lot of investment waiting to be made in various parts of the economy, notably the energy sector, and they need to know the rules."

Various speakers pointed to signs that other nations are already well ahead of Australia in implementing low-emissions policy and solutions—including China.

John Marlow of Macquarie Bank said one large government-owned Chinese energy company is investing the equivalent of eight per cent of Australia’s GDP in clean energy intiatives.

"The money is there for mitigating work, and the transformation of the energy sector in China is absolutely vast. These guys aren’t waiting for what the rest of the world does, or taking a subordinate role … they are very much on the front foot," he said.

Philippe Chauvancy of French company BlueNext said that in recent years China has put in as much wind power as Germany has installed over the past two decades.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
How dare this second grade politician tell us what to do!
Posted by tigerdicky, 28/10/2009 11:24:05 AM, on The Land
Gee so Combet is going to tax us more to make us more competitive. www.twawki.wordpress.com
Posted by Paul, 28/10/2009 11:27:40 AM, on The Land
How can an ex union boss like Mr Combet have the nerve to comment on "risking the nation's international competitiveness". The union movement once led by Mr Combet has been risking Australia's international competitiveness for years!
Posted by Chris, 28/10/2009 11:38:09 AM, on The Land
Joyce is getting bogged down in politicking for his own personal gain at a massive expense for Australia's future. Joyce should quit while he's ahead. He should either abscond from voting to let the ETS pass through the Senate or retire and let the intelligent politicians in Canberra actually do something for the betterment of Australia.
Posted by Annoyed Youth, 28/10/2009 12:31:14 PM, on The Land
Annoyed Youth, It seems to be that these people once questioned on the whole scheme they want to implement get really upset. Why is it that we are not having a DISCUSSION on such a major topic, views from either side can only make for a better result for all involved. There has been no discussion and whenever a relevant question is asked it is dismissed straight away. We are 1.4% of GLOBAL emission, the rest of the world do not care what Australia does. I thought the whole reason for having the convention at the end of the year was to come up with a plan there, if we already have one we are dismissing all the other people who want to help.
Posted by Bruce, 28/10/2009 2:29:17 PM, on The Land
When the unions weren't in government they were wrecking the Australian economy, now we have a government that hailed from the union movement nothing has changed - they are still hellbent on stuffing the Australian economy. Who will be to blame when people lose their jobs? The non climate change believers I suppose. The unions are responsible for companies going off-shore. Nothing has changed. It's about time people woke up and had a good look around but possibly they only have short memory spans. Most of the do-gooders weren't even born or were in nappies, so how would the know what happened earlier on.
Posted by petro, 28/10/2009 2:38:17 PM, on The Land
Bruce - Australia is 0.3% of the world's population accounting for 1.3% of the world's emissions, one of the highest per capatia emitters in the world. That is why what Australia does is important. Because other contries look at us and think if Australia emits so much per person, they should be allowed to as well. Also the Copenhagen Conference only sets the targets, it's up to indivdual countires to determine how they achive them. And the dicussion has been going on for a very long time...
Posted by Pops, 28/10/2009 3:05:01 PM, on The Land
Combet has it wrong again. No-one doubts climate change; what is in doubt is whether humans can change nature. We have not quantified the natural effect versus the population effect. Even more doubtful is whether Labor's higher taxes for the same or more pollution can have any effect at all (apart from the Rudd peacock strutting his stuff on the world stage). Australia being such a vast country can never be rated fairly on a population demographic. Australia needs a land area calculation for its baseline.
Posted by denis, 28/10/2009 3:36:02 PM, on The Land
Annoyed youth, if you want to go down this line of thinking then you will find it hard to find a job after you finish being a youth. The ETS or any derivative of it is a scam, all designed to fleece the public and see the money go where? Most likely to the global warming industry of scams such as renewble energy that doesn't work.
Posted by mick, 28/10/2009 5:34:23 PM, on The Land
Pops, get out of your own back yard and travel the world, which just doesn’t give a rats about what we do or think or emit, most don't even know who we are. Why should we emasculate ourselves economically so people like you can reinforce our your conceited image of your own self importance?
Posted by What the, 28/10/2009 8:17:34 PM, on The Land
1 | 2 | 3 | 4  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Assistant Climate Change Minister Greg Combet
Assistant Climate Change Minister Greg Combet
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
27 October, 2009
28 October, 2009
POLL
Q: For what level of cattle transaction levy will you be voting at this year's Meat and Livestock Australia annual general meeting?

$3.50
(64.9%)

$5
(35.1%)

Total Votes: 276
Poll Date: 25 October, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...