News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Fears for farming's future as students ignore agriculture 

Fears for farming's future as students ignore agriculture

13 Feb, 2012 08:03 AM
FOR the first time in more than a century, there will be no students starting first-year agriculture at the University of Western Sydney's Hawkesbury campus this year.

With only six students applying, the university ''had concerns about the quality of experience we would be able to offer these students'', a spokesperson said.

The university's applications for agriculture have fallen to about a tenth the level of two decades ago, when a typical year's cohort at the one-time Hawkesbury Agricultural College was 70 or 80 students.

The decline in agriculture enrolments is a long-term national trend, which Australia's Chief Scientist, Professor Ian Chubb, said posed a risk to Australia's food producing future and international standing, as well as a challenge to government, industry and the higher education sector.

With the world population expected to grow by 2 billion in the next 40 years, Professor Chubb said the world could not be a humane and safe place if those people were hungry. Australia would need to carefully harness its agricultural talents and skills to retain its position as a responsible global citizen with an influence in world affairs.

''We are going to have to manage activity in agricultural science and support both for internal purposes and for external aid purposes at a very high level, and grow it,'' he said.

Australia produces enough food to contribute to the diets of at least 60 million people and as many as 400 million people if investments in agricultural science, technology and training are taken into account, says the report of a government-appointed panel chaired by Professor Chubb on enhancing the effectiveness of Australia's agricultural research aid.

While Australia is internationally recognised as a leader in agricultural research and education, the $200 billion-a-year industry fears the graduate shortage will hinder the productivity gains it needs to stay profitable, be competitive and meet growing demand.

Professor Chubb said young people could not be forced to study issues of national importance, so incentives were needed. ''Doing stuff in the old way is not working,'' he said.

The number of agriculture graduates now being produced, about 700 a year, is only about one-sixth of what the industry wants, based on an analysis of advertised jobs by the Australian Council of Deans of Agriculture. Meanwhile, the number of Australian university campuses offering agriculture degrees has dropped from 23 in 1989 to nine.

''We have done a lot of soul searching about this,'' the council's secretary, Professor Jim Pratley, of Charles Sturt University, said. ''The general view is that people still think of agriculture in its old image, people sitting on tractors ploughing up the land, creating dust storms.''

But he said that contemporary agriculture was a ''sophisticated and complex'' multi-disciplinary field ranging from microbiology and biochemistry to marketing and nanotechnology which reflected the revolution in sustainable agricultural practice of the past 25 years.

The decline is ''extraordinarily serious'', said Emeritus Professor Richard Bawden, a consultant engaged to look into it by the University of Western Sydney and author of a report on the future of agricultural education for the World Bank.

''Old-fashioned agriculture degrees'' were becoming ''less and less relevant'', Professor Bawden said. ''What we need to do is sit down and recast the whole idea of what does it mean to be an agriculturalist.'

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
So how much farm land is actually left in western Sydney anyway? This Uni is in the wrong place at the wrong time to be running an Ag Degree program because of the shifting demographics of its feeder area.

As for the broader picture, where were these academics when farmers were being ruthlessly demonised over the past three decades? Where were they when fundamental legal principles like the presumtion of innocence were being trashed? Where were they when land was misappropriated by regulation?

Farmers kids refuse to spend good money on how to become second class citizens.

Posted by Ian Mott, 13/02/2012 11:04:18 AM, on The Land
Take one look around the Farming landscape, Farmers are under attack from all directions, if not city based green undy wearing Pollies who believe all things evil have come from the edge of a plow. Hard core greens that have the say over everything (except Mining) taking the water, the land and the control off those that thought they owned their own land. You can be kicked off your farm if a Miner wants to dig it up and thats after your've be demonised for the farming practices. Land is now a throw away comodity for Mining, why invest your life into farming, only to be kicked in the guts.
Posted by Liesandmorelies, 13/02/2012 11:04:47 PM, on The Land
I studied Agricultural Economics about 10 yrs ago. The professors taught us about the wonders of free trade and the opportunities it would bring for the ‘efficient’ Australian farmer. Part of our course involved spending time on working farms. The majority of the farmers I met told of life long struggles and were looking to exit given they couldn’t compete with cheaper imported commodities. They were also encouraging their kids to get city jobs to avoid the hardship. Losing the next generation of farmer is far more damaging than losing university graduate farmers.
Posted by bb, 14/02/2012 5:24:56 AM, on The Land
Further, now with the uncertainty that Coal Seam Gas has brought to rural areas, people are not interested in investing time and money for their dream farm when not only will you struggle to make a living, but you risk having a mining company take your land.
Posted by bb, 14/02/2012 5:27:11 AM, on The Land
With all the talk about Mother Gaia and suchlike it's a shame the general public aren't made more aware of the delicate balance of farming and communities.

To farm in a hostile environment like Australia you need a support group - family, friends and community. A good example is the way Condobolin residents recently rallied around their local butcher.

In the past (yes we are allowed to recognise beneficial past practises) good farm workers were often given a paddock of crop along with their wages to help support them into buying a property of their own. Now, in Ag terminology (cont.)

Posted by Bluey, 14/02/2012 7:51:25 AM, on The Land
(cont.) workers are now termed "work units" and, from the last recalled industry recommendation, should be "one work unit per 4000 DSE" (dry sheep equivalent).

With economic rationalism now king and no strong rural leadership, especially for small and medium farming families, competition with each other has become the norm - survivers are lauded and those that fall behind are ignored and denigrated.

As rural populations shrink, so do the local communities which again reduces the viability of youth remaining in those areas. Add to that the boom and bust nature of farming (cont.)

Posted by Bluey, 14/02/2012 7:51:44 AM, on The Land
(cont.) compared to the ever increasing input and living costs, and constantly rising, regulated wages outside of farming and it's fairly plain to see why farming is in crisis.

Those that survived the Great Millenium Drought are the best damn farmers this country will ever see. So maybe it's time we stop blindly accepting whatever policy or corporate spin that is thrown at us and put the future of farming back into the hands of experts - us.

Posted by Bluey, 14/02/2012 7:51:59 AM, on The Land
Mr Mott, I don't know where you think Hawkesbury Campus is, but it's not exactly in the 'burbs. Furthermore, it has on-campus accomodation, so location is not relevant.

Kids don't want to be farmers because all they ever hear from farmers is complaints. Try talking about the positives of farming as a lifestyle, and you might get some takers.

Posted by Reap What You Sow, 14/02/2012 9:45:25 AM, on The Land
The campus may not be in the "burbs" Reaper, but its feeder area is increasingly urban. And given a choice between a Uni close to home and a Uni where they have the major additional cost of on-campus accommodation, do you seriously believe location is not relevant?

And what a classic ignoroid cop out. As if all it takes to undo 3 decades of vilification is a few lifestyle "positives" over the dinner table. So get this through your tiny brain. Facts shape perception and negative facts will always override positive spin.

Posted by Ian Mott, 14/02/2012 12:14:50 PM, on The Land
Reap what you sow??? Have you ever sown anything? Who are you kidding, the lifestyle doesn't pay the bills. The tighter the cost/price squeeze grips the families that kids grow up in, the less likely they will be to see a future in farming that they want to a part of. Only one of my three children will study agriculture at uni, and for the privilidge she pays twice the HECS payment for her ag subjects as for her science subjects. Fair incentive for all but the most passionate to leave agriculture behind.
Posted by rankamateur, 14/02/2012 12:30:50 PM, on The Land
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Worried … Professor Ian Chubb. Photo: Lannon Harley
Worried … Professor Ian Chubb. Photo: Lannon Harley

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...