News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Farmers get wind of turbine trouble 

Farmers get wind of turbine trouble

19 Jan, 2012 03:00 AM
PROTECTING landholders who live near wind farms but receive no direct benefit from them will be among priorities for NSW Farmers in its submission to the State government on wind farms.

The State’s peak farmer body has welcomed draft guidelines on wind farms released by the government in late December and will take its own draft policy to an executive council meeting next month.

NSW Farmers president Fiona Simson said while a review of issues was welcome, clarity was needed.

Companies such as Origin – which has a big stake in NSW wind farms having purchased projects including Cullerin Range, Conroy’s Gap, Yass Valley and Snowy Plains from Epuron – want consistency, certainty and clearly defined protocols, along with effective stakeholder management.

And that’s exactly what NSW Farmers is seeking.

“We’re hearing numerous concerns from members, mostly from people who are affected by wind farms or proposed wind farms, and it is good the government is looking at this – a proper, upfront process is far better than fixing things afterwards,” Mrs Simson said.

“Some of the problems we are hearing about would seem not to have come about if there had been proper consultation.”

Planning Minister Brad Hazzard said the draft guidelines, which are up for public comment until March 14, struck a balance between encouraging investment and ensuring communities were protected from the impacts of wind farm developments.

“A central feature of the draft guidelines is a rigorous gateway assessment for wind farms where proposed turbines are located within two kilometres of existing residences,” Mr Hazzard said.

Without written consent from every resident within 2km of a proposed wind turbine, the “gateway process” is triggered, where the wind farm operator must lodge an application to a Joint Regional Planning Panel (JRPP) addressing concerns about noise, visual impact, any impact on land values, as well as other issues.

The plan would force NSW wind farms to be some of the quietest developed at under 35 decibels, compared with 40 decibels in Victoria, South Australia, New Zealand and Europe, and 50 decibels in the United States.

However, the NSW Opposition said the guidelines would “decimate” the industry, and The Greens claim slowing wind turbine development would mean more coal seam gas projects.

“NSW is abandoning the most cost-effective option for reducing its carbon footprint, which in effect means it is giving the green light for coal seam gas projects across the State,” said Greens planning spokesman David Shoebridge.

The Clean Energy Council’s Kane Thornton said the wind industry in Australia already faced some of “the strictest development guidelines of anywhere in the world”.

Mrs Simson said the “gateway process” on the 2km radius needed to be closely examined, and asked whether 2km was a sufficient setback distance.

She also wants to see tough rules on decommissioning.

“Wind farms have been phenomenally successful in Europe but there have been some problems with a large amount of disused turbines going into decay – what do you do with them?”

Another concern was protecting neighbours who received no benefit from wind turbines but could be impacted by them.

“We’d like to see the government do a little more work on the gateway process, but anything that requires the developer to consult with neighbours and the community is a good thing,” Ms Simson said.

“Compensation is not shared equitably, and another angle is planning, there are serious problems. But with predictions of a five-fold increase in wind turbines by 2020, we need to have a very good process in place.

“Most people are interested and would like to embrace wind energy but they need some guarantees their farm, lifestyle, and rural amenities will be preserved.”

The NSW Nature Conservation Council warned if guidelines were too restrictive, investment would be pushed interstate.

“Wind farm planning guidelines similar to those in Victoria would effectively declare our State closed for business,” chief executive Pepe Clarke said.

Friends of the Earth spokesman Cam Walker welcomed the government’s commitment that wind would be a major energy generator in NSW.

“While the guidelines are not as punitive as in Victoria, if this draft plan becomes law, there will be a number of worrying precedents which can be expected to negatively impact development,” Mr Walker said, adding setbacks should be measured in decibels rather than metres.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
It seems the only people suffering an adverse affect from wind turbines are those not receiving financial benifit from them.

A possible remedy could be spreading payment for the land use from where the property the turbine is on, to include surrounding affected properties. Money usually makes good medicine.

Posted by ajstevo, 19/01/2012 6:57:12 AM, on The Land
Wind is just a big con supported by gullible govts keen to be seen to be green and grovelling to the latte set.

You know, the sort of unthinking people who harp on about 'doing something for our grandchildren'.

It's ALL about making money using mafia tactics. This country has the greatest solar resource on the planet and the worlds most advanced home grown solar thermal tech embraced by many countries colder than us, and what do we do?

we export jobs and import giant proven useless wind turbines from the likes of Denmark and China while Germany of all places has become no1 in solar. OMG

Posted by William, 19/01/2012 7:15:22 PM, on The Land
ban windfarms nearly took my life, took my home, they are complete desaster. waterloo sa.
Posted by john marciniak, 19/01/2012 9:30:38 PM, on The Land
I am all for the current guidelines on windfarms after all they are really and industrial complex and should be treated as such.

However why is Flyers Creek not being assessed under these guidelines when all the other proposed complexes are to be so assessed?

Conveniently the new guidelines came into being several days after the Flyers Creek being assessed as part 3A especially as 44 x up to 150m high turbines are involved.

Posted by genie81, 20/01/2012 10:52:27 AM, on The Land
Anyone who thinks that payment is a cure has no idea what people have to put up with living near these industrial complexes. Go stay within 5 km of a wind complex and see how you like living with them ajstevo.

Admittedly not everyone gets sick but some do and no one walks away from their home for lack of money especially when a property worth over a million or more is abandoned after years of creating a paradise.

Posted by genie81, 20/01/2012 10:56:47 AM, on The Land
We have had turbines for three years now - USA - they are good neighbors, clean,and almost invisible...way better than the mess out in the oilfields....the one's opposing them just need to get a life......shut off their electricty for a week... and get their opinoin then.....
Posted by dakota farmer, 20/01/2012 12:57:23 PM, on The Land
Ah, a breath of intelligence and good common sense from an American cousin.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 20/01/2012 1:46:29 PM, on The Land
its good to see their are still hillbillies in the USA. What would you do for power today when there is not a breath of wind its 35 degrees and everyone has the air con running full boar?

But then again i wonder if your not just a desperate wind developer trying the old "its ok in other countries trick" when really the same problems are cropping up everywhere.

Posted by janet, 22/01/2012 3:29:25 PM, on The Land
The development changes associated with the turbines is reactive to incompatibility. It ignores health risks to those living with the fallout. No independent evidencing of low frequency noise. These elements now not contained in EPA noise policy requirements. If Governments stay with this non-evidencing requirement, our suggestion is that if residents cannot live with the turbines, that the wind companies be mandated to buy their properties at pre-existing market values. Such a move would introduce market accountability to those imposing on whoever gets in their way.
Posted by Gary Goland, People's EPA, 22/01/2012 5:36:02 PM, on The Land
The CSIRO has released a research paper titled: Exploring community acceptance of rural wind farms in Australia: a snapshot. http://bit.ly/A1N1rg

The research revealed majority community support for Wind Energy, why am I surprised the LNP's Greg Hunt has questioned its independence and integrity (the CSIRO that is) equalled by the general climate denial from Abbott, Baillieu and O'Farrell!

It also said that outcomes could be improved with better community engagement and spoke of compensation to all residents within a radius, I think this would be a fairer outcome for all.

Posted by broken_gate, 22/01/2012 6:45:25 PM, on The Land
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
POLL
Q: Are the NSW Government wind farm guidelines a step in the right direction?

Yes
(20.2%)

No
(69.7%)

Undecided
(10.1%)

Total Votes: 980
Poll Date: 17 January, 2012

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...