News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 CSG admits water damage inevitable 

CSG admits water damage inevitable

03 Aug, 2011 06:40 AM
THE coal seam gas industry has conceded that extraction will inevitably contaminate aquifers.

The Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association told a fiery public meeting in Sydney that good management could minimise the risks of water contamination, but never eliminate them.

''Drilling will, to varying degrees, impact on adjoining aquifers,'' said the spokesman, Ross Dunn. ''The extent of impact and whether the impact can be managed is the question.''

The admissions came before the start of the first public hearing in NSW, held in Narrabri, of a Senate inquiry into the effects of coal seam gas mining.

The hearing was told that many farmers in northern and western NSW were angry about proposals to extract coal seam gas from their land, and some planned to join a mass campaign to lock their gates in the face of resources companies.

The NSW Farmers Association said a ''gas rush'' had been driven across NSW in the past two years because the state government had allowed a five-year exemption on paying royalties on coal seam gas extraction, to facilitate the growth of the industry.

Mr Dunn addressed a meeting - organised by the NSW Greens - in Leichhardt on Monday night. It discussed the planned drilling of an exploratory well in St Peters by a coal seam gas company, Dart Energy. He later said he stood by his comments, and that they applied to the industry in general.

''The intent of saying that is to make it clear that we have never shied away from the fact that there will be impacts on aquifers,'' Mr Dunn said.

''I'm wanting to ensure that we are not seen as saying there won't be any impacts during the process. It is a matter of monitoring and managing those impacts.''

The contamination of underground water supplies by coal seam gas mining, and particularly the controversial fracking process which injects a mixture of sand, water and chemicals into rock strata at high pressure, has been among the chief concerns of people opposed to gas extraction.

Mr Dunn said the geology of different gas extraction sites varied and, in many cases, the aquifers affected would be too deep for rural land use, so agriculture would not be influenced.

The government has imposed a moratorium on fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, until the end of the year.

Opponents want all coal seam gas mining banned and a long-term study carried out into the health and environmental effects.

The president of the Farmers Association, Fiona Simson, told the Herald she was yet to meet a rural land-holder who approved of the way the coal seam gas industry was doing business.

''We have land-holders across NSW who are already being impacted by coal seam gas companies seeking to demand access to their land,'' Ms Simson said.

One submission to the Senate inquiry, from the medical group Doctors for the Environment, outlined some of the potential health risks posed by coal seam gas mining.

It said some of the compounds used during drilling, or released from underground by drilling, could ''produce short-term health effects and some may contribute to systemic illness and/or cancer many years later''.

''The public health consideration of these matters has been inadequate, leaving the population exposed to potential health hazards,'' the submission said.

The industry in Australia has consistently said there are no known health risks associated with the practice in Australia or overseas.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Prime agricultural land should be exempt from mining/CSG

Potentially affected landholders should have input into choosing monitoring sites to ensure collection of pre-mining data, recharge events, falls in levels and quality variations. Raw and interpreted data should be provided to all parties

Funding should be available for landholders to hire their own hydrologists, etc with local knowledge taken into account for ground truthing.

The process for evaluating water/other impacts should empower affected parties and their experts in a collaborative decision making process.

Posted by Heather, 3/08/2011 8:51:11 AM, on The Land
This headline is shockingly misleading. It's got so that reasonable people can't speak reasonably without being pilloried.

Must we force everyone into extreme positions?

Posted by Pro Freedom, 3/08/2011 10:14:19 AM, on The Land
Ban Unconventional Gas, Full stop. These Nimby attitudes are sickening. Don't these fools realise that being a Nimby is as low as you get, it's even lower than the miners, but not as low as the crud that signs deals with the gas companies.
Posted by anti-mining.com, 3/08/2011 12:07:31 PM, on The Land
There are two much more fundamental issues at stake.

One is called Freehold Rights.

The other is called Democratic Feedom.

Nobody should have to lock their gate.

A simple NO should be all that is required.

If someone wants something then they should buy it at an agreed price or go away if the owner doesn't wish to sell. It shouldn't matter if it is a piece of junk or a desire to enter private land.

EVERYONE who enters on private land should be asked to leave if the owner so desires or be charged with trepass if they don't leave. Miners are no different to the rest of us.

Posted by daw, 3/08/2011 4:24:10 PM, on The Land
Some landholders are already adversely affected by impacts from mining/CSG and have very limited scope to obtain administrative justice.

After15 years experience of a Government regulatory system that permits technical assessments to be shaped to fit political commitments to "minimum compliance" - reform is badly overdue. These industries should be required to properly comply with Water Reform/NWI and other environmental legislation so as to properly protect affected landholders, their water supplies, land potential and air sheds.

Posted by Heather, 3/08/2011 5:05:59 PM, on The Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...