News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Court blow to farmers fighting Caroona coal exploration 

Court blow to farmers fighting Caroona coal exploration

07 Jan, 2010 10:52 AM
FARMERS trying to block BHP Billiton from exploring for coal in some of the most fertile land in NSW have lost the latest leg in their legal battle, but have promised to keep challenging.

The NSW Land and Environment Court yesterday dismissed proceedings brought by farmers from Caroona, from the Liverpool Plains.

The Caroona Coal Action Group (CCAG) said the Government had failed to follow due process when it issued BHP's exploration licence, but the court ruled against the farmers.

Chief Justice Brian Preston found no grounds for ruling the licence was invalid, but stressed the court was not judging whether the licences should have been granted in the first place.

The decision comes after blockades by the farmers, who fear that developing the coalfields could damage aquifers that are critical to their livelihood. Despite the setback they say the fight has further to run.

CCAG spokesman, Timothy Duddy, would not rule out a further challenge in the Court of Appeal. ''We are not about to roll over just yet,'' he said.

Mr Duddy said governments were cutting corners with approvals because of the lure of mining royalties. BHP paid $100 million for the permit in 2006, setting a record, while the Chinese-owned Shenhua paid $300 million for another licence in the area. A year earlier, the licences were estimated to be worth about $10 million each.

''They are turning a blind eye to the proper processes and they are turning a blind eye to the laws that they created,'' Mr Duddy said. ''It would be a very brave court that ruled in our favour in this business, when so much of the state relies on the proceeds of mineral exploration.''

Federal Greens leader, Bob Brown, has responded to the news saying Environment Minister, Peter Garrett, should intervene immediately to protect the rich farming land of the Liverpool Plains.

"The Minister has the power and the responsibility to protect farms and ensure underground water supplies for the plains are safe," Senator Brown said.

"The Land and Environment Court decision to allow mining exploration by BHP Billiton is another blow to the local farming community who are battling valiantly to protect their environment and livelihoods now and for future generations."

The case is being watched closely because of its potential implications for other mining deals. Because of the commodities boom, it is one of a growing number of clashes between farmers and resources companies.

Miners and energy companies have the right to explore for resources on private land under the Mining Act, but the intrusion and environmental damage has sparked similar protests in other areas, including Queensland's coalfields.

After an inquiry into the impact of mining in the Murray Darling Basin, a Senate committee last month called on state governments to conduct regional water plans before releasing more permits.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Coal will not feed us but fertile land can and there is not a lot of that left. In our travels we have noticed that what was fertile land producing fruits and vegetables has been subdivided and now covered with houses.
Posted by towardswellness, 8/01/2010 7:13:05 AM, on The Land
Mr Garrett, the choice is yours - short term windfall profits for multinationals & corrupt state govt combined with environmental destruction, OR long term protection for our food bowl & its water supplies?
Posted by feltonfred, 8/01/2010 11:18:59 AM, on The Land
Another instance of exactly why Peter Spencer is on a hunger strike. Beware Australia, we are being systematically sold out to China. They have little respect for the ethics we hold dear. We will become their quarry. We will suffer. This is a disgrace.
Posted by Rebecca Dance, 8/01/2010 1:32:28 PM, on The Land
A truly disgraceful situation that reeks of dodgy short-term corporate/government gain at the expense of long-term security. This illustrates just how rancid our legal, political and corporate systems have become.
Posted by brett sanders, 8/01/2010 7:29:11 PM, on The Land
As was reported on the Peter Spencer case, it is the politicians, not the lawyers, who must resolve this problem. Too much our modern governments have sought to abrogate democracy by passing political decisions to the legal system, with Howard's Aboriginal Land Rights issue demonstrating the pinnacle of this practice. Here the politicians have emulated King Midas, who killed the goose that every day laid him a golden egg, and then have hidden behind the courts as they do their dirty work.
Posted by Ted O'Brien., 9/01/2010 6:56:37 AM, on The Land
Farms owned by Australians. Mines owned by overseas interests that have no regard & for any future problems. Only Australia has taken this path as our system is run by multinational company's that can influence out comes with big sponsoring. (How much money would you take to turn a blind eye). Sadly money runs the show. Until we stop political funding, common seance will not prevail. And the restoration of owners' rights on freehold land should prevail as they are not the ones that are spewing out tons & tons of greenhouse gases and are doing this without any regulations or penalties. Look after your cents and the dollars will look after themselves. As look after your country first and the rest of the world last as we have a big back yard that needs a clean up.
Posted by Tonytwotimbers, 9/01/2010 11:57:30 AM, on The Land
Dear Editor, WOW!!! $100 million BHP paid re permit re coal mining, ....$300 million paid by CHINESE-OWNED SHENHUA FOR ANOTHER LICENCE in the area!!! ....The 'PIED PIPERS' would not knock those $s back...NO MATTER HOW LEGALLY , PRACTICALLY, & MORALLY WRONG THEY WERE/ARE!!! ...BUT, TRUTH ALWAYS PREVAILS!! ...There was A TOWER OF BABEL once...& the new hightest grandiose skyscraper /Dubai...IS BUILT ON SAND!!! as most(?) of the new areas there are. Check out: The GAIA Atlas of Planet Management 1985, PAN BOOKS/ Dedication: To the poor of the world, denied their share of the world's rich resources . And to Jim Lovelock, whose Gaia Hypothesis first alerted us to the idea that we might inhabit a "living" planet . GAIA (my emphasis js), in ancient Greece, was Goddess of the Earth. (note capital E/Earth js). I bought this book after seeing it on The Mike Walsh Show as I was researching 'NEW AGE RELIGIONS' / NEW WORLD ORDER/ UNITED NATIONS ...&...on the Far Nth Coast our area was being very much influenced by the 'new settlers' after the Aquarius Festival at Nimbin NSW! These & big banks etc & Gov/ Opp call the shots!! CLAIM YOUR INHERITED RIGHTS! Jill
Posted by Jillian Spring, 9/01/2010 12:18:49 PM, on The Land
The Caroona farmers' battle to preserve our most iconic agri soil smacks of Eureka Stockcade. China, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, India and the Emerites are land-grabbing worldwide since they fear future food security. The Shenhua Corp "stays innoculously in the shadow of BHP Billiton" but the land grab is tantamount to China's first attempt to take Australia's most valuable food base. Once a foreign nation owns our food bases they will be lost forever. The Federal Government's Foreign Investment Review Board has curtailed Chinese ownership in coal and minerals which lie under the soil and ignored what grows on top of the soil i.e the crops that feed the nation. Is that what a clever nation does? China doesn't.
Posted by Maria, 11/01/2010 12:40:49 PM, on The Land
The Caroona farmers' battle to preserve our most iconic agri soil smacks of Eureka Stockcade. China, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, India and the Emerits are land-grabbing worldwide since they fear future food security. The Shenhua Corp "stays innoculously in the shadow of BHP Billi eton" but its land grab is tantamount to China's first attempt to land grab Australia's most valuable food base. Once a foreign nation owns our food bases they will be lost forever. The Federal Government's Foreign Investment Revue Board has curtailed Chinese ownership in coal and minerals which lie under the soil and ignored what grows on top of the soil i.e the crops that feed the nation. Is that what a clever nation does? China doesn't. If Australians tried this in China they'd be arrested. Why are the lobbyists always obeyed and the people and farmers ignored? It's certainly not democracy, so what is it? A question all Australians need to ask. Any nation that kowtows to a foreign nation earns only its contempt.
Posted by Maria, 11/01/2010 1:04:31 PM, on The Land
Sorry to read the news that you lost the court proceedings. Keep fighting, never give up. From one of your Canberra protestors.
Posted by John, 5/03/2010 5:45:12 PM, on The Land
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...