News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Caroona strikes back in Supreme Court 

Caroona strikes back in Supreme Court

05 Mar, 2010 02:36 PM
A WIN by Liverpool Plains farmers struck a blow against large coal miners this morning in the NSW Supreme Court.

The decision handed down in the State’s highest court could threaten a large number of coal exploration access agreements in NSW.

Two Caroona farming families – Sharon and Geoffrey Brown along with Les and Margaret Alcorn – went through an unsuccessful arbitration process last year and lost a case in the Mining Wardens court but today had those decisions overturned.

The Supreme Court’s decision is expected to give farmers greater power to refuse miners access to their land if miners breach access agreements.

Legislation states banks must be told by mining companies about exploration work on land where the banks have an interest.

This is because mining may change the value of the land.

Last year the Mining Warden said it was not vital for mining company to notify a bank of its activities but that decision was quashed today.

In an all-encompassing statement this morning the Supreme Court’s Justice Schmidt said: “I order that the decision of the Warden’s Court as well as the determination which accompanied it and the interim and the final determinations of the arbitrator be quashed.”

A short statement released this afternoon by mining giant BHP, which has exploration licenses on the Liverpool Plains, said: “BHP notes the Supreme Court’s decision and is now considering the options available to it.”

Chair of the NSW Farmers Association’s mining taskforce, Fiona Simson, said it was “fantastic news” for farmers.

Her taskforce was seeking legal advice about whether numerous exploration access agreements in NSW were now void.

It is expected to only protect farmers on parcels of land in which banks have a financial interest and where mines have not notified the banks about their exploration.

* More details in next week's The Land.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Caroona now- Hunter Valley next!
Posted by Tigerdicky, 5/03/2010 3:12:30 PM, on The Land
So if you have a mortgage, you appear safer then you were yesterday..... what about those farmers who have paid their properties off after multi generational ownership and hard work - where is their fall back protection off "ownership" ????
Posted by which bank ???, 5/03/2010 7:23:29 PM, on The Land
Unfortunately, mining companies can get around this ruling by buying up land and then exploring on their own properties. Gloucester Coal and Gloucester Resources have done this already in the Gloucester Basin. For those landholders who have not sold out, DON'T, as this Supreme Court decision could be applied to landholders in the Gloucester Valley and therefore help save it from further mining. Would this ruling apply also to AGL who is exloring for gas in the Gloucester Valley?
Posted by Aussie, 5/03/2010 11:10:46 PM, on The Land
When I heard on 10TV news 5.00pm: Farmers win case against mining giant, DID MY EARS PRICK UP - is that Caroona farmers I wondered/hoped! Sure enough it was!! At last, a bit of common sense & justice; the justice fought for so long & hard for all those years ago in England, of which we have had the privilege of using; those inherited laws, SO IMPORTANT TO KEEP! Many people have tried to take us away from those laws but they are God's Laws & His Truth is the Foundation. Omit Almighty God from society; embrace 'man's ways' (as we have been 'enticed' to do) & what do we get - we see it everyday--disaster & shattered lives. Congratulations to all who never gave up!! Jillian Spring Billinudgel NSW
Posted by Jillian Spring, 6/03/2010 12:39:33 AM, on The Land
Caroona now - Gloucester next! Many landholders just 5kms from the town of Gloucester are now selling to the coal exploration company GRL. After three years of waiting they now have to endure another three years of not knowing whether there will be a coal mine on their doorstep or not. The stress these people are facing is too much. Lives put on hold. The exploration company is spending millions on acquiring land and building an agricultural company. While the money spent on finding out if there is minable coal is very little. But it's okay as it is legal to acquire land by using people's fear.
Posted by Gloucester RIP, 6/03/2010 10:33:47 AM, on The Land
How dare the mining companies use their own money to buy land and use it for their own nefarious purposes. Who do they think they are? Everyone knows it's far better to grow food worth $100 than mine coal worth $1000.
Posted by dickytiger, 8/03/2010 11:27:25 AM, on The Land
Will Ian Armstrong, the former National Party Leader and only NSW Coalition Deputy Premier still living, ever say anything in support of farmers under threat from mining or is he on the payroll of the pro mining NSW Labor government since retiring from parliament in 2007?
Posted by Totally Cheesed Off, 8/03/2010 9:33:11 PM, on The Land
Our next members of parliament should be members of the Carroona Action Group and the anti Traveston Dam group. They to me seem like they have common sense and are willing to fight for what is right. Not like the lame ducks we have now.
Posted by High Country Gent, 10/03/2010 7:32:54 AM, on The Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
07 January, 2010

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...