News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Caroona ruling could have dire consequences for jobs, miners warn 

Caroona ruling could have dire consequences for jobs, miners warn

10 Mar, 2010 11:30 AM
THE mining industry has warned that a landmark Supreme Court decision in a case concerning BHP Billiton could paralyse investment in NSW and jeopardise the state's budget and thousands of jobs.

NSW Minerals Council CEO Nikki Williams said the state government should be worried about the decision, which would lead to a bureaucratic nightmare making it impossible to do business, according to The Australian Financial Review.

She said mining companies would be forced to negotiate hundreds of access arrangements for even a small project, including with utility providers who had easements on properties for access to infrastructure.

Mining exploration would cease, industry growth would be stunted and mining royalties reduced, Dr Williams said, with obvious consequences for declining state revenues, which have been propped up by mining royalties.

NSW Resources Minister Ian Macdonald said the government was still considering the "potential wide-ranging and unintended impacts" of the decision.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Nikki Williams is only a dodgy puppet for the dodgy mining companies. Mining provides for short term employment, not inter-generational employment that the agricultural industry can and does provide. Why dig up our fertile agricultural areas so China can produce and sell us more shonky merchandise. Think about future generations Nikki, not just your monthly bank balance.
Posted by brett sanders, 10/03/2010 11:00:37 PM, on The Land
This decision could have ramifications for the whole state, not just for "fertile agricultural areas" (Brett Sanders). It could cripple the exploration industry. No exploration, no new mines. There are already substantial obstacles in the way of exploration. Many exploration companies have no cash flow, and it will not take much more before they either go somewhere else (not NSW) or their potential investors leave their money in term deposits.
Posted by Barney, 11/03/2010 9:57:35 AM, on The Land
Shut up the scaremongering. What's more important, food or minerals? Which of these can you eat?
Posted by High Country Gent, 11/03/2010 10:04:35 AM, on The Land
What? The mining industry would have to really negotiate and consult? How dare the courts tell them that! Poor things, everyone's always picking on them. It's a small victory but give it six months the State Government would have legislated this one away.
Posted by spottedquoll, 11/03/2010 11:07:22 AM, on The Land
If these areas that exploration is occurring in were properly evaluated before the licence was granted to determine equitable land use, a lot of the conflict would be avoided. Unfortunately it is cheapest for mining companies to extract coal close to rail depots, and these were mostly constructed near farming land and people. And so the State government gives out these licences and the battle commences... almost always resulting in the mining companies emerging victorious. What they like to talk about as justification: Jobs. What they don't like to talk about: How many of the people of NSW get sick from breathing the dust, and who pays to fix them? Why, that would be the people of NSW..
Posted by strategic_vision, 11/03/2010 2:37:15 PM, on The Land
Give me food to eat any day. This area is far too important to have it jeopardised by mines. For goodness sake our food bowl has to come before mines. And just how much of the profit remains in Australia anyway? And what about redirecting some of the royalties to the country instead of spending it all in the cities. Fair go.
Posted by maybalene, 11/03/2010 10:22:59 PM, on The Land
The biggest threat to us is that the mining continue unabated. How dare they threaten us (the people of NSW) with sending us broke. Any way if it does, then would be a good time to do away with States. They are probably working on the old saying 'The best form of defence is attack'. Well bring it on - BEFORE they destroy the land they propose to mine.
Posted by daw, 13/03/2010 9:18:02 AM, on The Land
The sooner this government is gone the better.
Posted by High Country Gent, 18/03/2010 1:44:00 PM, on The Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...