News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Caroona fight with BHP starts in Land Court 

Caroona fight with BHP starts in Land Court

27 Oct, 2009 05:56 AM
A GROUP of irate farmers has launched a legal challenge against BHP Billiton in to bid to stop the company from developing coalfields in the state's north-west.

Landowners and residents from the Liverpool Plains, near Tamworth, sought to overturn a BHP licence to explore in the area in a case before the NSW Land and Environment Court yesterday.

Known as the Caroona Coal Action Group, it says the State Government failed to comply with the Mining Act 1992 when it issued exploration permit EL6505 to BHP in 2006.

The action is the latest step in a prolonged stoush between farmers and miners in the region, which could have big ramifications for others looking to exploit the region's coal resources.

If successful, the case could upset plans from other mining companies, including the Chinese Government-backed Shenhua, to mine in the area.

Farmers, some of whom have blockaded access to miners, fear that developing the coalfields could damage aquifers.

One prominent landowner and opponent of the miners, Timothy Duddy, said the Government had failed to follow proper procedures when it issued the permit that BHP paid $100 million for in 2006.

Shenhua paid $300 million for another licence in the area, which Mr Duddy compared with 2005 estimates that the permits were worth about $10 million.

"Everything's been done in haste because everyone gets so blinded by the amount of cash," Mr Duddy said outside the court.

Meanwhile, separate figures published yesterday from the NSW Minerals Council show state government mining revenues doubled to $1.3 billion last financial year and have risen 400 per cent since 2004-05.

In court documents, the community action group argued that the Minister for Mineral Resources, Ian Macdonald, did not have the proper powers to grant EL6505 to BHP.

Both BHP and the office of Mr Macdonald said they would not comment on the matter because it was before the court.

But last month, in an attempt to address some of the residents' concerns, BHP ruled out open-cut or long-wall mining underneath the region's floodplain.

The hearing continues in Sydney.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Interesting proceedings... poses the question, did Minister Ian Macdonald have the the proper powers to grant to Gloucester Resources Limited (GRL) (formerly Gunnedah Resources Limited), coal exploration licences nos. EL6523, EL6524 & EL6563?
Posted by Gloucester resident, 27/10/2009 8:48:46 AM, on The Land
So tell me Sydney, what side are you city people on? If you don't mind coal and gas tearing down our wonderful landscape I guess you won't say boo.
Posted by Dave, 28/10/2009 7:49:26 AM, on The Land
What if the mine was underground, Dave? Anyway, we can't eat the landscape or heat our homes with it. Since we like to do both, you'll have to learn to get along with each other.
Posted by Deep Green, 28/10/2009 10:05:39 AM, on The Land
This govt has never done any thing by the book since they have been elected! They are as nearly as bad as the AWB's antics!
Posted by tigerdicky, 28/10/2009 11:28:08 AM, on The Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...