News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 PETA vows war after peace plan rejected 

PETA vows war after peace plan rejected

26 May, 2008 04:15 PM
LOS ANGELES - The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has vowed to launch a new global public relations and economic campaign against Australian wool growers after a peace deal it offered was rejected.

PETA proposed a three-point peace plan on May 1 to end its four-year global anti-mulesing campaign that led almost 20 international clothing retailers - including Hugo Boss, Perry Ellis, Abercrombie and Fitch, Timberland, H&M and Victoria's Secret - to ban the use of Australian wool from mulesed sheep.

Mulesing involves cutting skin from the hindquarters of sheep to prevent flystrike, a painful and often fatal condition caused by fly larvae feeding on the tissue, but PETA claims the preventive medicine is in itself cruel.

The Australian wool industry's research and development body, Australian Wool Innovation (AWI), dismissed the peace deal in a letter it sent to PETA's Virginia headquarters on Friday.

"We will not compromise our ongoing progress and the risk of an increased number of sheep being exposed to the pain and suffering associated with flystrike," the letter, signed by new AWI chairman Brian van Rooyen and eight board members, stated.

The letter drew a stern response from PETA.

"As you can imagine, we at PETA were disappointed by your May 23 response to our 'peace offer' letter," PETA's director of corporate affairs, Matt Prescott, wrote in a letter sent to AWI today.

" ... accordingly, our work with retailers worldwide urging them to withdraw their support from mulesing mutilations will continue full speed ahead until such a change does take place."

In rejecting PETA's three-point plan, the AWI board wrote it will "continue to vigorously research alternatives to surgical mulesing" and maintain a commitment to phase out surgical mulesing by December 31, 2010.

AWI also stated it fully endorses the use of pain relief for sheep in the interim.

PETA was particularly disappointed AWI appears to be pushing ahead with clip mulesing, an alternative to surgical mulesing.

PETA also deems clip mulesing as cruel and wrote "retailers such as Perry Ellis, Hugo Boss, H&M, IC Companys, Matalan, and others have publicly stated that they do not - and will not - support it".

Under PETA's three-point peace deal, Australian farmers would need to immediately end the use of clip mulesing and replace it with flystrike control methods that "don't involve the removal of skin or flesh".

Australian farmers also would have to ensure that after 2010 they would not remove "flesh and skin" from sheep's rumps "by standard or clip mulesing or any other procedure aimed at managing flystrike".

Thirdly, farmers would immediately undertake bare-breech programs nationwide "with the goal that every wool-producing sheep in Australia will be bare-breech by the end of 2013".

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
At last we are getting some sense.

What could possibly be worse than to have our sworn enemies, and PETA are our sworn enemies, engaged in the management of our industry?

Up until now we have jumped to PETA's every call, while PETA has relentlessly campaigned against us.

PETA are not a part of mainstream society.

They should not be treated as though they are.

Our attempts to engage reasonably with PETA have allowed PETA a field day in the marketplace. This has to stop.

We are working towards getting a viable alternative to mulesing by 2010.

But it would be very foolish to breed inferior sheep for the sake of a bare backside.

There has to be a better way.

Posted by Ted O'Brien, 26/05/2008 8:35:29 PM
Peta would rather see the increased use of chemicals to protect sheep from flystrike, as well as the world wearing synthetic clothing made from petro chemicals, both of which have an envioromental cost.

The ethics of so-called animal rights lobbiest that would see sheep die an extremly painful death eaten alive by maggots becuase they want the only current protective measerment banned before a replacement can be found is unbelievable.

Peta have no other plan than to have everyone a vegetarian dressed in leaves.

Posted by Barely surviving, 27/05/2008 9:08:39 AM
Perhaps AWI should invite members of the clothing retailers to come to Australia and inspect sheep that are infected with maggots and dying around the paddocks, and show them the chemicals that we have to pour on them to keep them alive, maybe then they will see how hard it is to keep our sheep clean from fly strike and the harm that could be done by excessive use of chemicals.

Stuff PETA, I am sick of the tail waging the dog!

Posted by Had enough of PETA, 27/05/2008 10:53:21 AM
The 'response' was typical of a politically motivated, intellectually unstable mob when its aims run into a bit of opposition from people who have moral right and common sense on their side.

Keep it up, AWI - little doubt the tide is turning in your favour and, above all, no more Munichs.

Posted by Michael Mcgrath, 27/05/2008 12:42:49 PM
Perhaps a good old fashion American style class action "Lien" across the assets of PETA lodged in the US courts under the Uniform Commerical Code (UCC) would make this vegetarian based organisation heel.

Proving market blackmail is not a problem in satisfying the conditions for the "Lien".

Posted by Dr Bob, 27/05/2008 1:38:55 PM
are PETA vegetarian??

Silly me thought P.E.T.A. stood for People Eat Tasty Animals

Posted by macca, 2/06/2008 8:30:42 PM
I support PETA's campaign against this cruel and profit-hungry ruthless animal abusing industry 100%.

Will donate $100 to PETA to further help them with their amazing work to end animal suffering in the world.

Posted by Eric, 11/06/2008 10:19:42 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Will the rising cost of fuel and fertiliser prevent your farm business from returning a profit this year?

Yes
(83.6%)

No
(16.4%)

Total Votes: 318
Poll Date: 25 May, 2008

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...