News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 PETA threat to widen boycott on mulesing 

PETA threat to widen boycott on mulesing

21 Nov, 2008 12:17 PM
Animal welfare activists are threatening to widen international boycotts of Australian wool if the industry does not recommit to end the practice of "mulesing" sheep.

This follows the takeover of the industry body, Australian Wool Innovations, by a faction critical of the 2010 deadline for phasing out mulesing, in which skin and flesh is cut away from the animals' hindquarters to prevent fly strike.

Matt Prescott, campaign director with People For The Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) said that if the deadline was scrapped then new boycotts could be initiated against retailers that refused to stop using Australian wool.

He said PETA had direct assurances from dozens of retailers that they would not use Australian wool until mulesing was abandoned.

Growers were told at AWI's annual meeting in Perth that they did not need to adhere to the mulesing phase-out.

PETA's statement follows the dramatic changes to the Australian Wool Innovation (AWI) board at the AGM in Perth on Wednesday this week.

The new board is more likely to extend the current 2010 deadline for ending mulesing if viable alternative procedures to prevent fly strike haven't been developed by then.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size



RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I will fight on the beaches. I will never surrender!
Posted by THE FARMER, 21/11/2008 9:17:14 AM
I hate to say it, but chalk up a win for Peta. They have achieved everything they set out to do and more, and all they did was to get farmers fighting with one another.

The multi-national green extremists, like HSI, Greenpeace, WWF, are well versed in these tactics and we dumb Aussies took it hook, line and sinker.

The wool industry won't be the last agricultural casualty if we are dumb enough to let immature divisions like this continue in our peak bodies.

Posted by Trev, 21/11/2008 10:14:43 AM
If you haven't got the guts to fight, you can't win! The bulk of fine wool in the world comes from Australia. The retailers, denied this supply would cave in before anyone else.

Today they might support PETA, but when their sales are dropping on fine woollen products, and they see their competitors who don't support PETA getting increasing sales, how long will their support of Peta last?

Posted by Trugger, 21/11/2008 11:14:48 PM
Mulesing is a disgrace! Would farmers be happy to have surgery performed on them while theywere tightly restrained with no anaesthetic administered? I bet they wouldn't! If a farmer insists on breeding wrinkly sheep, anaesthetic should be used. If he can't afford it, he should not be breeding wrinkly sheep. Plain bodied sheep don't require mulesing.
Posted by John, 23/11/2008 7:52:57 AM
Could someone please explain to Ian Munro that mulesing doesn't involve "skin and flesh is cut away from the animals' hindquarters" as he says above.
Posted by Interested, 25/11/2008 9:50:51 PM
Vain people have skin tucks why not sheep? There is no flesh involved or fat! My daughter recently did her dental practical in SE Asia. She was surprised no anaesthetic was used for fillings and extractions. She surmised the people must have a better pain tolerance than us westerners, as they all smiled and thanked her as they left the chair.

Anesthetics are not all good! Local delays healing and a general would be a death sentence for many lambs. Sheep are bred tough, like SE Asians.

Posted by Common Cents, 27/11/2008 11:32:17 AM
PETA is not a rational organisation. Remember, their objective is for humans to have nothing at all to do with animals.

Their tactics will divide farmer against farmer until all of us unite to name them and their dark creed as the enemy. We must keep on using the the definitions which farmers themselves have rediscovered in this fight Farmers feed and clothe the world.

Mulesing is an animal husbandry technique Food Security is the number one challenge for the world. Farmers are not cruel, but wise and caring. Farming has a 60 000 year heritage while Animal Liberation/Rights philosophy is part of the failed 1960s, 1970s attack on common sense

Let's keep on naming PETA for what it is.

Posted by Fr Mick Mac Andrew Bombala-Delegate NSW, 27/11/2008 3:31:30 PM
PETA has not taken anything from us in the marketplace. They simply moved into ground which we had vacated by cutting production. Twice. And right now the opportunity may be there for them to do it again, because again we have cut production.

And Ian Munro has been around for long enough for us to expect that he should know more about this problem than to parrot PETA's views.

Posted by Ted O'Brien, 27/11/2008 5:49:18 PM
Sorry, Father Mick...but I am not one bit impressed by what you have to say. Animal cruelty is an absolute disgrace, no matter what your thoughts might be.
Posted by olivia, 28/11/2008 9:57:09 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Would you approve if the Federal Government put the budget into deficit in order to counter the effects of the global financial crisis?

Yes
(40.5%)

No
(54.8%)

Undecided
(4.7%)

Total Votes: 677
Poll Date: 17 November, 2008

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural Northern Beef Week
 
MON0152
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
2UE Royal Broadcast
 
Photo Library
 
Land Subscriptions
 
Rural Bookshop
 
The Land Facebook


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...