News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 Mulesing deadline: AWI "supports all" options 

Mulesing deadline: AWI "supports all" options

23 Jul, 2009 10:20 AM
AUSTRALIAN Wool Innovation (AWI) has moved to dismiss reports over a divided board approach to the mulesing deadline.

Outspoken company director David Webster on Saturday joined chief executive Brenda McGahan in expressing “support for all growers” in their approach to breech strike prevention.

In response to a call by Tattyoon, Vic, woolgrower Geoff King at the Australian Sheep and Wool Show in Bendigo, Vic, on Saturday, to put straight the position AWI had on the 2010 mulesing deadline, Mr Webster replied: “We will support all growers best practices” and added that there were options “out there” including clips, pain relief, chemical processes and more crutching.

But in an interview with Rural Press last week Mr Webster made it clear that many growers would continue the practice of mulesing.

"I don't think many more growers will stop mulesing," he said.

"We have seen people try to stop - and then restart the next year.

"There are reports in South Africa that they are tail stripping without mulesing.

"But the reality is, at this time, there is no real viable alternative to mulesing."

The “support for all” comment follows the publication of an open letter to Marks Spencer sent last week from AWI director Laurence Modiano.

He asked the retail giant to abandon its plan to source wool for its menswear line from non-mulesed wool.

He dismissing all chances of a mulesing alternative being found in time for the agreed 2010 deadline.

It also followed demands by WoolProducers president Don Hamblin for the AWI board to show “some discipline” and keep a unified position on the agreed deadline.

Mr Webster had earlier said it was unquestionable that the vast majority of growers could not run sheep successfully without mulesing.

Mr Webster said growers had raised their standards with best practice management and accreditation programs.

But, in the end, the market would decide if growers would stop mulesing.

“This is where we should have been four years ago,” he said.

Merino stud breeder Graham Wells, One Oak, Jeriliderie, NSW, agreed market signals would inevitably dictate which way Merino producers should head.

“The key issue is about animal husbandry…so for those of us breeding sheep it (the mulesing deadline) must come in at a slower time,” Mr Wells said.

Meanwhile, the Victorian stud Merino president Tom Ashby said AWI’s call to “support all” should give confidence to breed sheep the “way they want to breed and move forward.

“Eventually we are all going to have to move down that easier care track," he said.

"And I take my hat of to those producers who have got there and taken early steps and been able to stop mulesing.”

Rural Press understands that the AWI board will be meeting this week where an official statement on the mulesing deadline is expected to be formulated.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Nine months the new AWI Board have been in charge and nine months later they still don't have a coherent position on mulesing. The 'support all growers' catchcry is nothing more than populist spin. Rather than doing the right thing - front woolgrowers and explain the commercial realities of the international wool trade to them, they prefer to tell woolgrowers what they want to hear. It might win them continued control of the moneypot at AWI but in the long term it will cost the Australian wool industry big time. The mills have told Australia they don't want mulesed wool. The retailers in Europe and the US have told Australia they don't want mulesed wool. Yet AWI arrogantly and stubbornly refuses to listen. Keep fiddling Nero, keep fiddling...
Posted by Sir George, 23/07/2009 11:06:22 AM
The statement by Mr Webster to “support all woolgrowers” and to keep funding research & development into “alternatives to mulesing” is all that the board of AWI can do without breaching the Federal legislation that enacts and funds AWI. The AWI board cannot in its own right “Ban Mulesing” under this legislation as has been suggested and, any person that suggests that the AWI board use powers that it does not possess is off with the pixies. Australian Wool Innovation does not own the sheep, woolgrowers do, and, it is the woolgrowers' responsibility as the primary carers of the sheep carrying the wool to look after the welfare of that animal, of which, the prevention of maggots eating the animal while it is still alive, is just but one. The welfare of the animal may be subject to new innovation; however, market forces cannot be classified as either a new innovation, or a category of animal welfare. As has been suggested he should, this woolgrower refuses to put “Markets” before “Animal Welfare” and if the markets close, then they close, because this woolgrower no longer cares. What section in the debate is this not understood ?
Posted by Rob Wass, 23/07/2009 12:46:59 PM
Perhaps someone needs to front Sir George and explain to him the commercial realities of trying to run an extensive Merino flock without mulesing. What part of 'I don't need to grow wool' don't you get Sir George? Australia produces 90% of the world wool supply. The retailers and processors have to realise that mulesing is a vital part of our operations, not some optional extra that we can turn on or off at their whim. Up till now no one seems to have the guts to explain this to them. I can exit the wool industry in less than a month. After which point the whole debate will be of no interest to me whatsoever.
Posted by Qlander, 23/07/2009 1:01:32 PM
Qlander, the rest of the wool industry understands your view on mulesing. They just don't accept it anymore.

They say: "Cant grow wool without cutting sheeps' bums? Then won't grow wool."

No other fibre suppliers treat their customers with such brazen disregard and arrogance. The Duponts of this world understand that the customers needs are paramount. They don't tell them to 'go jump' like (some) Aussie woolgrowers, like you, are doing.

And the idea that because Australia grows most of the apparel wool at the moment guarantees that wool customers have to pander to your arrogance is just plain silly.

NZ, South Africa and Argentina's wool industries are just laughing - and watching the orders roll in...

Posted by Sir George, 23/07/2009 9:10:31 PM
It's time for "Sir George" to out himself instead of hiding from the real world behind a pseudonym. You have had a lot to say...now come out and stand behind it, if you want to be seen as real. You sound like a stooge of PETA. Perhaps you are?
Posted by Ted O'Brien., 24/07/2009 7:35:23 AM
This AWI 'statement' just adds to the confusion. It is bumpf.

As for Sir George, from what perspective are you sounding off on this? How many sheep, if any, do you run? Have you done your figuring on the costs involved in maintaining large flocks without mulesing?

And what about this fact: Just 3.75pc of the Australian fine wool clip is "Not Mulesed' or "Ceased Mulesing" at this stage. As matters stand, this percentage is unlikely to increase by much very soon.

So where is the industry to get its unmulsed fine wool from, if it is to stay in business? And at what price - somewhere well below woolgrowers' costs of production? Not likely.

Posted by observer, 24/07/2009 8:09:24 AM
Ned thinks there should be a media ban on mulesing. The only discussion in the media should be on fly strike control. That is the real issue!

And it is extremely frustrating not to be able to measure the premium in prices for wool from non-mulesed sheep.

Posted by ned, 24/07/2009 8:19:45 AM
Perhaps it is already time for Marks & Spencers et al to look for replacement apparel rather than wait to see what happens.

If Merinos have been bred to a point where mulesing is indispensable, the question becomes why Australia has such sheep. Wool is not indispensable nor is it significant in world textile trade.

There is a segment to be had, but as with all futures nothing is guaranteed.

Posted by Observant, 24/07/2009 12:13:43 PM
Keep pulling the fetlock, George. Keep kow-towing. The chinese show no respect when they routinely reneg on contracts. The Russians show our meat no respect by blanket bans. Pakistan reckons our wheat is full of iron ore.

Why is it that we have to worry about them saving face and nobody gives a fat rats clacker about us?

Posted by THE FARMER, 24/07/2009 2:51:02 PM
Are you sure, Sir George, that these countries don't use mulesing on any of their sheep?
Posted by rod, 24/07/2009 3:53:24 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
AWI director, David Webster.
AWI director, David Webster.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
20 July, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you agree with the ACCC's finding that last year's spike in the price of fertiliser was due to normal market forces?

Yes
(13%)

No
(81.8%)

Undecided
(5.2%)

Total Votes: 499
Poll Date: 19 July, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...