News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 Intradermal mulesing to market in 2010 

Intradermal mulesing to market in 2010

27 Aug, 2009 04:00 AM
EXPERIMENTAL flystrike prevention treatment, Skintraction, has delivered results comparable to surgical mulesing for the first time following new trials on 2000 Merinos.

The promising work, by Cobbett Technologies, uses sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) - an active ingredient in varicose vein treatments for humans - to reduce wrinkle and increase the bare area around the breech and tail of sheep.

The chemical works by tightening the skin in the targeted breech area.

Sheep treated with the intradermal technology were on show at the National Merino Show and Sale at Dubbo, NSW, this week, alongside unmulesed and mulesed siblings.

"For five years we have known we have had the right chemical, but the main thing has been the development of the applicator and getting that chemical into the skin and that has taken up the last three to four years," said Peter St Vincent Welch, director of research at Cobbett Technologies.

"In the latest trials we have been trying to minimise the number of treatments while maximising the stretch and bare area."

Trial participant David McBurnie, has used Skintraction on 470 Merino lambs – described as medium sheep with plenty of skin - on the family's property at Balladoran near Gilgandra in northern NSW for the past two years.

Results from the test lambs showed that the chemical treated skin fell off at 35-50 days revealing new bare skin underneath comparitive to surgical mulesing.

"As far as the breech is concerned I would defy anyone to say this technology is not working," Mr McBurnie said.

"From last year I could see the application on the tail needed some refining and this has now happened with sheep treated this year."

When the lamb was treated, he said there was "no pain, no needles and no blood".

"Straight away the lambs walk away and are feeding."

According to Australian Wool Innovation (which is funding research into Skintraction), a CSIRO welfare assessment found the treatment involved "very little stress" for the animal due to its application and the formulation containing the antiseptic, benzol alchol.

The promising results have raised hopes of an early commercial release with approval from the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) pending and release by tipped for the end of next year.

"There is no reason why it should not be approved, it is a common household chemical widely used in shampoos and toothpaste," Mr St Vincent Welch said.

Mr St Vincent Welch's team's study has involved more than 1000 fine and medium Merino lambs across regional NSW treated from two to 12 weeks, with results yet to determine a most effective age of application.

He said preliminary work costed Skintraction at $1 per sheep.

An Australian Wool Innovation spokesman said the results were encouraging, but "science can't be rushed".

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This sounds natural to me!
Posted by tigerdicky, 27/08/2009 8:38:27 AM
The need for alternatives to mulesing is accepted by most people in the sheep and wool industry but is the use of the chemical sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) a humane alternative?

Sodium Lauryl Sulphate started its career as an industrial degreasant and garage floor cleaner. The following are some of the results of research on SLS:

• Sodium Lauryl Sulphate has a low molecular weight and so is easily absorbed by the body. It builds up in the heart, liver and brain and can cause major problems in these areas.

• Sodium Lauryl Sulphate causes skin to flake and to separate and causes roughness on the skin.

• Sodium Lauryl Sulphate causes dysfunction of the biological systems of the skin.

• Sodium Lauryl Sulphate is such a caustic cleanser that it actually corrodes the hair follicle and impairs the ability to grow hair.

One would hope that some long-term health studies are carried out on the animals before release for use.

Lambs have a very high pain barrier, observe their recovery after castration, so to say there was "no pain, no needles and no blood" and "straight away the lambs walk away and are feeding"... is no indication that there is NO long term and detrimental health issues.

Posted by cropdoc, 27/08/2009 8:50:20 AM
Cropdoc, naturally some people with a financial interest in proprietary pain relief products for sheep don't want a viable alternative to surgical mulesing.

Let's give this reportedly promising alternative plenty of oxygen and see where it might take the industry.

Posted by Woolman, 27/08/2009 11:51:26 AM
No mention of the pain of burnt skinn, drying and falling off as painful. Ever had sunburn or scalding? Chemical burns to make this happen would still be very painful.
Posted by wm0141, 27/08/2009 12:33:13 PM
If this stuff is so bad, why the hell are people allowed to clean their teeth and wash their hair with it?
Posted by Qlander, 27/08/2009 12:47:41 PM
Woolman, pain relief products will have a very important role to play in the sheep industry, aside from mulesing. Castration and tail docking is still necessary. In fact it has a very important role in all livestock industries that require practices like that.

The fact that this was found so quickly when the pressure came on suggests to me at least that the researchers have been asleep at the wheel in that regard.

Posted by Qlander, 27/08/2009 2:42:10 PM
This may yet be our silver bullet. How much and how soon?

It's a bit dicky what is 'natural' these days, Crop doc, many things are fine in small doses, like arsenic, and nobody is suggesting that they live on it.

More research is needed about actual fly wave conditions and the need to jet post marking.

Posted by THE FARMER, 27/08/2009 5:40:12 PM
Congratulations to the previous AWI board and management. They funded and supported this technology - something that would be very unlikely these days at AWI.

Just imagine what possibilities exist with the other technologies that AWI is refusing to research fully - locked in the cupboard in Sydney.

It would be worth getting the SARDI researchers to talk to the Rural Senate Committe, just to get some transparency on this matter.

Cropdoc, interesting you raise concerns about SLS but not trisolfen, the ingredients of which are far more potentially nasty.

Posted by Sir George, 28/08/2009 10:51:26 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Treated animal on the right (less wrinkle), unmulesed on the left.
Treated animal on the right (less wrinkle), unmulesed on the left.
Peter St. Vincent Welch (left) of Cobbett Technologies Pty Ltd, Hornsby, NSW, demonstrates the Skintraction applicator with Weealla Merino stud co-principal, Stuart McBurnie, Balladoran, NSW, at Dubbo this week.
Peter St. Vincent Welch (left) of Cobbett Technologies Pty Ltd, Hornsby, NSW, demonstrates the Skintraction applicator with Weealla Merino stud co-principal, Stuart McBurnie, Balladoran, NSW, at Dubbo this week.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
26 August, 2009
25 August, 2009
POLL
Q: Should the Federal National Party split from its coalition with the Liberals?

Yes
(52.3%)

No
(43.3%)

Undecided
(4.4%)

Total Votes: 501
Poll Date: 23 August, 2009

Most popular articles

1) Apple iPhone 4 16GB56 plans 17%
2) Apple iPhone 4 32GB53 plans 16%
3) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB37 plans 2%
4) Samsung Galaxy S44 plans 3%
5) HTC Desire4 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press

Circle8
 
FOL EMAIL SUBS


WA
VIC
SA
QLD
WA
QLD
VIC
SA

The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...