News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 China seeks non-mulesed wool supply assurance 

China seeks non-mulesed wool supply assurance

15 Jul, 2009 02:39 PM
CHINA's largest vertically integrated wool mill has waged into the mulesing debate this week seeking assurance from Australia's federation of wool organisation that wool from non-mulesed sheep will be available.

"In the last three years, increasing requests have been made from our international customers to provide products made from non-mulesed Australian wool due to strong pressure of the animal liberation movement," Sunshine Group's director of technology Cao Xiuming said in the letter.

"It is envisaged that these requests will become more frequent in the foreseeable future.

"Being a principal Australian wool user we urge the Australian wool industry to recognise this fact and adopt practices which will ultimately satisfy the needs from its customers."

The Sunshine Group is the largest wool producer of its kind; currently equipped with 180,000 wool spindles, it produces up to 32 million metres of fabric and 3.5 million sets of garments.

Australian Wool Industries Secretariat executive officer Dr Peter Morgan said communication seeking assurance of long-term supply should be perceived as a positive sign for wool demand.

"It reflects what we have been hearing from processors," he said. "It is not new.

"They are alerting the Australian industry and saying that they are getting requests and they want Australia as its major supplier to be able to supply wool that will meet its customer needs."

A letter has been sent from FAWO to Sunshine Group confirming steps had been taken to identify wool from unmulesed sheep and ceased mulesing properties.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
'THE FARMER' seeks assurances that he will be paid stocks more to compensate for the extra cost of production and the extra deaths.
Posted by THE FARMER, 15/07/2009 8:08:46 PM
Sourcing the amount of wool they desire and the way it is raised is a matter for the Sunshine Group to overcome. Hint – may be a bigger cheque book would help if, woolgrowers are forced into losses because maggots keep eating their sheep and destroying the wool.
Posted by Economics101, 16/07/2009 2:14:01 AM
I believe we should continue to research better animal welfare practises with regard to mulesing. However, it is a bit of joke to get pressure from a country that has one of the worst animal welfare records in the world.
Posted by mules, 16/07/2009 8:11:22 AM
No mention of how much more they are prepared to pay, I notice. There are plenty of alternatives to growing wool for livestock producers. Most of them are already more profitable than wool growing - without the added cost of trying to control flystrike without mulesing. Also what has happened to the chemical-free wool debate? Somehow, that seems to have been sidelined in all this.

The key issue here is the processors are trying to bluff all woolgrowers into not mulesing. That way, they won't have to pay a premium because all wool will be unmulesed. Sorry guys, it's not going to happen! If you want unmulesed wool, are going to have to pay extra for it. I know that there are growers out there that can manage their flock without mulesing. All I say is: good luck to you if you can get a premium for it. For me, it is either mules or get out of wool.

Posted by Qlander, 16/07/2009 9:18:13 AM
Given the above comments, you lot still don't get it. Stop your crying and start producing what your customers demand.

If you can't do that profitably, then your position is untenable. It's that simple.

Posted by Micheal, 16/07/2009 10:45:16 AM
Price signals and the market will ensure that growers move to non-mulesed production. It is up to Sunshine Group to negotiate a better price for growers.

The Chinese can keep telling us what they want, but there is no point lifting your costs of production if customers don't perceive in dollar terms a benefit to your product.

Oh, and China, is it ok to mistreat political activists and limit free speech, yet the thought of saving a sheep's life from flies is too much for you to buy our wool?

Posted by Round Eye, 16/07/2009 11:04:04 AM
I don't have any emotional attachment to wool growing, if there is a profit I will grow it, if not I won't.

But I do think that this whole mulesing debate is just one part of a two-pronged, or even three-pronged attack from PETA.

Getting growers to stop mulesing in response to 'market' demands is one prong.

'Market' demand for chemical free wool - another prong.

And when growers are not mulesing and not using chemicals, wait until seasonal conditions produce a major fly wave. And then prosecute growers for not caring for their sheep properly under the animal welfare legislation.

It must be remembered that the stated aim of PETA is to stop all livestock farming. For those people who can produce wool without mulesing or using chemicals, it is actually to your advantage if the majority of growers continue to mules. That way you have a niche market and hopefully get a good premium for you wool.

Posted by Qlander, 16/07/2009 11:51:22 AM
I've solved the mulesing problem. I grow wool-free sheep these days. The stuff is simply not worth the bother, now that the Chinese own most of the wool processing equipment, so can dicate the price.

Running Merinos without mulesing, however, is little more then cruelty. But this is way beyond the comprehension of Peta, the Chinese or others who don't understand the sheep industry.

The Chinese are clearly being pressured and Peta is a feelgood activist group, without an ounce of common sense or understanding of Merino farming, between the lot of them.

Posted by yabby, 16/07/2009 2:31:16 PM
Yep, great idea fellas, bag one of the biggest users of Australian wool. Shoot the messenger and miss the point completely.

I can't see why such a straightforward request generates such a xenophobic response (is that you, Pauline?).

Keep mulesing if you want. The mills will just buy from South Africa, Argentina, New Zealand...

Posted by Sir George, 16/07/2009 8:08:45 PM
Yes George, it must be infuriating trying to lecture to men and women of principle. Your breathtaking inability to understand this principle, as recited through your insupportable comments, is only enhancing your melancholic disposition.
Posted by Economics101, 17/07/2009 1:55:18 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
14 July, 2009
12 July, 2009
POLL
Q: Is Malcolm Turnbull the best person to lead the Federal Opposition?

Yes
(53.3%)

No
(35.3%)

Undecided
(11.5%)

Total Votes: 584
Poll Date: 12 July, 2009
SPECIAL FEATURES

Most popular articles




The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...