News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 Biological blowfly control a possible mulesing boost 

Biological blowfly control a possible mulesing boost

19/05/2008 2:25:00 PM
The same bacteria used to produce insect-resistant cotton could provide a natural, chemical free answer to mulesing.

Scientist Barry Hayes says the highly effective bacteria used to generate Ingard and Bollgard cotton – Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) – could be the basis for a natural defense against the sheep blowfly.

Mr Hayes, of Geomite, says Bt has been found to effectively kill sheep blowfly larvae when combined with a protein bait for the flies to lay eggs in.

However, despite offering them the patent, he says Australian Wool Innovation (AWI) has not trialed it.

"Here I have an idea with real scientific merit and it's not interested," he said.

When ingested by fly larvae, Bt release a deadly toxin that kills maggots within 12 hours.

By drenching sheep with a mix of the bacteria spores and gelatin protein, both pass through the sheep's digestive tract and are expelled in the dung.

As the maggots require protein to grow (hence their flesh eating nature), the flies are drawn to the dung.

However, ingesting the spores of the bacteria is fatal as once inside the maggot a natural toxin is released by the activated bacteria spores.

"The first function of this is as a drench," Mr Hayes said.

Both the protein and the mechanism to release the toxin in the gut of the maggots are presently under a patent owned by Mr Hayes, who is looking for a manufacturer and a research arm to give the idea a chance.

"AWI had this for a year and I signed a confidentiality agreement with them, but the verbal understanding was that it was to be trialled at the end of 2006.

"I investigated and found out they had done nothing about it at all and refused to give any reason."

AWI stated that proposals were considered and assessed on the three key criteria of science, merit and the capacity to get the idea to market.

"While AWI must adhere to signed confidentiality agreements, the operating principle is that new ideas are assessed against key criteria and a judgment call is made, on behalf of woolgrowers," AWI said.

"Generally, if an idea or a product is good, it will attract a commercial partner quickly.

"AWI is not in the business of taking such products to market, that is the role of commercial partners.

"Proponents are always welcome to re-submit ideas for assessment under due process. AWI will contact Mr Hayes to facilitate this."

Roughly 80pc of the cotton now grown in Australia is 'Bt cotton'.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Further proof that we live in a faithless non-scientific 'see it and believe' age.

Scrap AWI and bring back CSIRO with real dedicated independant scientists, not commercially orientated doubting Thomases!

Posted by common cents on 20/05/2008 10:16:17 AM
One more instance of a country that is not progressing because it does not support science.
Posted by O.Parkes on 20/05/2008 11:37:23 AM
This is an ill thought out idea, one that should be grounded immediately. What about the dung beetles and earth worms that would be killed as well. They are under attack for drench chemicals now - give them a break!
Posted by ggwagga on 20/05/2008 6:43:51 PM
If we are going to have a wool industry after 2010 a different solution to the fly problem has to be found.

It has to be outside the square as clips and genetics are not the quick answer.

There are challenges in any solution but surely it is worth trialling??

Posted by save the wool industry on 20/05/2008 10:02:22 PM
Hello ggwagga, just to set your mind at rest, Bt is only active against a range of caterpillars and flying insect pests - it's quite safe for earthworms and beetles.

Actually our major damage to earthworm activity in Oz soils is posed by certain nitrogen fertilizers and copper compounds.

Unfortunately we don't have a soil biohazard protocol for pesticides and fungicides, so have little knowledge of the harm to soil biology arising from their use.

When correctly formulated to operate in maggot gut, Bt kills them within 12 hours.

Apparently AWI saw the name Bt in my patent and didn't bother to look further - I've just learned that they have no record of it so assume it was consigned to the bin!

Posted by barry hayes on 23/05/2008 2:20:31 PM
By the way, I want to thank Marius for bringing this to public attention.

The patent has applications way beyond flystrike and has been found effective against tape and roundworm, codlin moth, and is now to be trialled against phytopthora and several vine mildews...but guess what - the only enquiry I've received for commercial production of the preparation and the very effective trap which augments it, has come from a US multinational.

We had a saying when I was a kid - Wake Up Australia!

Posted by barry hayes on 23/05/2008 2:29:34 PM
Bt has is a fantastic natural control mechanism that has been around for thousands of years yet Bt cotton has produced resistant super-bugs in just a decade.

Regular drenching of sheep with Bt would just hasten the development of resistance (as well as killing millions of beneficial organisms).

Posted by graham brookman on 23/05/2008 6:14:44 PM
Yes, resistance occurred in a few cases graham, but since I began using it in 1968 the original strain has remained lethal, so I'm not sure what goes on re. the resistance story.

As regards the health of those millions of beneficial organisms, it really doesn't happen that way in nature because an eco balance is achieved.

Just as we can't eliminate cuprina, so we can't eliminate the beneficials - they achieve balance.

Anyway, consider the effect of the host of lethal chemicals now applied to our soils and animals - far more horrific than Bt!

Posted by barry hayes on 26/05/2008 5:37:05 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: How do rate this year's Federal Budget offerings for rural and regional Australia?

Excellent
(1.3%)

Good
(2.8%)

Average
(9.5%)

Poor
(37.7%)

Terrible
(48.7%)

Total Votes: 316
Poll Date: 18/05/2008

20/11/2008 | Wool's ugly politics, seen at it's worst in recent months, will not change with new faces at Australian Wool Innovation; the problem is deeply rooted in the very structure of the body.
NSW Beef Spectacular
 
Land Subscriptions
 
FSA online
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
Rural Bookshop
 
FET
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...