News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 $100/bale unmulesed incentive from New England 

$100/bale unmulesed incentive from New England

2/07/2008 12:35:00 PM
The mulesing debate has uncovered a new innovation.

Keen to see unmulesed woolgrowers rewarded for their extra management, wool buyer New England wool has offered a $100 per bale incentive for unmulesed wool it purchases.

The change stems from the Italian processors of superfine wool for which New England Wool specialises in sourcing product.

Growers of wool declared as unmulesed through New England's own declaration system will qualify for the $100 rebate.

New England managing director, Andrew Blanch, said the company and its Italian shareholders were worried about growers of the high-quality spinners type wools of which the Italian textile trade was synonymous.

"We have a history of supporting our growers and have even been known to bid against ourselves to see that the very best wool achieves a fair and reasonable price," Mr Blanch said.

"This development is a way of practically helping growers move towards unmulesed wool if they want to."

The rebate roughly equates to $2 per sheep and Mr Blanch said that would hopefully cover the extra cost of management associated with producing unmulesed wool, such as an extra crutch or Clik application.

"It has been well received by our growers. This might just be the catalyst for some growers to try and produce some unmulesed wool," he added.

The mulesing issue clearly threatens the production of the high quality Italian spinners wools that traditionally comes from bloodlines that often display a high level of wrinkle and can be susceptible to flystrike.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This an excellent example of commercial incentives rewarding woolgrowers. New England Wool were leaders with incentives for using nylon woolpacks in the 1990s. Well done. Woolgrowers are also looking to breed sheep that are more resistant to breech strike.
Posted by Martin Oppenheimer on 2/07/2008 3:50:00 PM
I think they would rather call it an incentive as a premium would be on a per kilo basis. But then again why let the facts get in the way of a good news story.
Posted by mabel Peton Smyth on 3/07/2008 7:51:59 AM
There is no such thing as unmulesed wool. I hope ther are not too many mulesed woolgrowers out there!
Posted by harry on 3/07/2008 8:26:13 AM
This is a very good initiative from New England, what isn't so clear is will the $100/bale premium apply to both fleece and oddment bales?
Posted by Rob on 3/07/2008 8:49:51 AM
Whilst New England Wool display great initiative, they should go on to describe the wool that they buy. I can see wool producers from the Western Division and Riverina queuing up for the rebate only to be told their wool does not suit the tight New England specifications.
Posted by ned flanders on 3/07/2008 9:51:09 AM
It is still incedible that the Australian wool 'industry' is held ransom by a group of pop stars, and/or movie stars....led on by the tabloid press, who first gave us SARS, and then Avian Bird Flu, and continue to do the P.R. work for the international terrorists. why don't they do something worthwhile, such as promoting nuclear generated energy, or in my tiny Tasmania, deal with the semi-intellectual greens, with their low grade, unscientific 'worry', and promote damning of rivers, and sustainable, hydro-electricity, and the promotion of birth control for humans, who are simply out of control!!!.....mulesing does not come onto the 'radar' as relevant to this century!!!
Posted by Sanders frith-brown on 3/07/2008 10:55:11 AM
Show me your money! I've heard so much hot air over the years on premiums that I'll believe it when I see it.
Posted by Ted O'Brien on 3/07/2008 10:58:12 AM
Think for one moment what this offer means. The narrow meaning is that a small part of the market is prepared to pay a hefty premium for product sourced from animals allegedly not dealt with in a particular way. The broad meaning is that the greater part of the market does not care how the animals are dealt with, provided that good quality product available at a realistic price is the end result. The determiner in the mulesing battle will be the market, not PETA, and certainly not socially shortsighted woolgrowers and buyers who give way to PETA's fascist philosophy.
Posted by Micheal Mcgrath on 3/07/2008 4:03:54 PM
We sold wool in a non-mulesed. Some wool was passed in and we got 20-30 cents more the following week, so much for premium. There are some of us in arid areas of Australia growing the bulk of the wool that when a particular job is done it must be 100% effective not 50-60% that is being obtained at trials of different methods at present.
Posted by Ray on 8/07/2008 9:19:52 AM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: Do you trust the Greens to handle the Senate balance of power responsibly?

Yes
(22.1%)

No
(74%)

Undecided
(3.8%)

Total Votes: 728
Poll Date: 29/06/2008

26/11/2008 | If we're serious about roo farming, we'll need to start with a breeding program and kangaroo EBVs for marbling and tenderness.
 
NSW Beef Spectacular
 
Beef Week
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
Rural Bookshop
 
Land Subscriptions
 
FSA online
 
FET
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...