News 
 National Rural News 
 Property 
 General 
 Great Southern to sell cattle stations 

Great Southern to sell cattle stations

29 Apr, 2009 01:53 PM
The debt-laden, ASX-listed Great Southern has put its three prize cattle stations across northern Australia on the market for a price expected to be well over $100 million.

According to The Australian Financial Review, the sale includes 100,000 branded cattle and is expected to be the biggest official public offering since AMP offered the Stanbroke portfolio in 2003.

The move comes after Great Southern, which has $105 million in debt due to be repaid by October, gained shareholder approval to issue new shares in return for its beef cattle projects.

The 660,800-hectare Moola Bulla at Halls Creek in Western Australia, is the largest holding offered, closely followed by the 596,430-hectare Wrotham Park at Chillagoe in Queensland. The third property is the 182,000-hectare Chudleigh Park at Hughenden, Queensland, which Great Southern bought from Starwell Pty Ltd in 1994.

Great Southern's chief executive Cameron Rhodes said the sale of the properties was part of the company's

strategic plan, as announced to the ASX on April 8.

"We have a very clear Five Point Plan in place to assist us in achieving our short term priorities," he said.

"Part of that plan is to sell the company's non-core assets, which includes these cattle properties."

According to Great Southern, the properties all have close proximity to sale yards, live export ports and therefore the south East Asia market.

Moola Bulla will go to auction in Darwin on Tuesday, 16 June, 2009. Chudleigh Park and Wrotham Park will go to auction in Townsville, Queensland, on Friday, 19 June, 2009.

They will be sold as three separate lots by real estate agents Ray White Rural Queensland and Elders Queensland.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This is what happens when corporates try to become farmers. It's hard enough without trying trying to compete against these inefficient clowns that pay over inflated prices for land, stock and so on, and when commodity prices fall they then dump large amounts of product on the market and kill the price for the poor family-based farms. Every few years one of these over-capitalised circuses goes under and this one may yet join Timbercorp. Leave agriculture to family operations, not corporations.
Posted by pete, 29/04/2009 2:31:27 PM
I wrote this a few days ago regarding the demise of Timbercorp. The 'cap' fits Great Southern: Harvesting (of bluegums) here in WA has been going for just a few years. The majority of investors have yet to see a tree harvested. What should now be established is what yields have been achieved over time and how the actual compares to what was forecast in the Annual Prospectus. We need to establish what science, what peer reviewed trials and research, were used to determine the potential yields that were enthusiastically promoted by the MIS companies. It is common knowledge that the majority of actual yields have been below those forecast. Have the directors, over time, been indulging in misleading and deceptive conduct? How do the investors feel about all of this? What is the position of those landowners who have let or leased their land to Timbercorp? For instance: Who will manage the plantation? If it is ready to harvest who will harvest it? Will the administrator harvest an unprofitable crop? Where will the extra money needed come from? Who or what timber company, is in a position to take over the Timbercorp plantations? If Timbercorp eventually fails, what happens then? Will we have a feral forest on the best land in the country? We have already had trouble collecting rates, now what?

Oh dear, what a mess. What a terrible case of rural vandalism. It's easy to say "I told you so". But I did, ten years ago, and got ostracized for it. Don't let anyone tell you this is all down to the present global financial crisis, the troubles were there long before all of that happened. Poor science, poor budgeting, overly optimistic yields to make the prospectus work are all to blame. In fact I reckon that the whole fiasco was some government approved and enthusiastically endorsed, pyramid selling scheme.

Posted by Roger Crook, 30/04/2009 8:06:25 AM
Having the Qld govt, EPA and green groups sitting at the dinner table with you is enough to frighten investors off for life as well.
Posted by R, 30/04/2009 8:45:29 AM
The waste of good country here in NSW has been a national disaster. Fair enough plant poor country but leave good alone. Some quality New England country has been destroyed by these forests.
Posted by High Country Gent, 30/04/2009 12:22:34 PM
These company directors should be held to task. If I send my own property broke I have to rent a house and scrap and beg to feed my family. These guys get fat bonuses and go down to the club for a whisky. Then start on the next stuff up.
Posted by Qman, 30/04/2009 7:32:21 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
28 April, 2009
27 April, 2009
POLL
Q: Are Managed Investments Schemes hurting or helping rural communities?

Hurting
(73.9%)

Helping
(14.2%)

Undecided
(11.9%)

Total Votes: 479
Poll Date: 26 April, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...