News 
 National Rural News 
 Livestock 
 Sheep 
 Sheep exports in danger 

Sheep exports in danger

23 Jan, 2012 10:00 AM
THE fallout from the live export crisis that shook the government last year has spread to the Middle East as sheep traders accuse Agriculture Minister Joe Ludwig of jeopardising the $200 million market by bungling new regulations.

Senator Ludwig will return from leave to lead an emergency delegation to the region on Thursday following industry warnings that it would be impossible to meet a February 29 deadline for export accreditation and the trade could grind to a halt, The Australian Financial Review reports.

Companies that sell sheep to the Middle East say the rules do not suit those markets and have not been properly explained by the Australian government to the local authorities involved in the live trade.

Industry leaders who will accompany Senator Ludwig to Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Bahrain are pushing for an extension of the deadline and want the government to take account of the local conditions.

"We are not going to be ready by March 1," said Michael Stanton, a director of Perth-based Emanuel Exports, which sends about 1 million sheep to the Middle East each year.

"Nothing we say has been taken on board [by the government]."

Animal welfare activists have long called for an end to live sheep exports to the Middle East, arguing too many sheep die at sea and are mistreated.

Animals Australia executive director Glenys Oogjes said the industry had had plenty of time to meet the deadline and was seeking to blame the government for its own failure. She urged Senator Ludwig to hold firm to the February deadline for live exports.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Typical response from industry, Cry foul when it doesnt go their way or the costs are too high or when it all seems too difficult.

The filthy cruel industry has had a long time of easy trade- unhindered by welfare compliance.

Times have changed. Put your money where your mouth is and show the world just what you have done..then the truth will again be exposed.

Posted by live export must stop, 23/01/2012 12:34:37 PM
Yeah, right, a low rent animal nutter from barbi-world has the gall to demand that farmers "put their money where their mouth is". And not a trace of irony either.

Would that be from one of the much touted 560,000 "members" of Get-Up who don't have to pay a brass razoo for their membership? Or one of the ABC/R$PCA rent-a-goons who don't mind forking out $9.60 to an impoverished Indonesian meat worker for some "cash-for-cruelty"?

And where is all that money from the ALP MP's super fund to invest in half-time meatworks that don't have the labour or the market for the product?

Posted by Ian Mott, 23/01/2012 3:47:51 PM
This meddling with the sheep trade is another example of the Gillard gang being a reactionary instrument of reckless mobs feeding the media machine with press releases laced with false allegations.
Posted by jock, 23/01/2012 4:53:33 PM
If you want to stop this industry, how about a plan to replace it? Not just "we can do this onshore", but "here is my money to fund the building of a processing plant..." It's pathetically easy to pull something down, when the consequences don't affect you, when you have nothing at risk and then your ideology blinds you to common sense.

If you want an example of what happens when that gets institutionalised, then look no further than the Greens-Labor utopia of Tasmania. First class ecomonic basket case.

Posted by ME Again, 24/01/2012 9:05:48 AM
Perhaps we should export the "the export must stop" brigade. They obviously have the welfare of the importing countries at heart. While we are banning things we should ban welfare payments to foreign countries as well.
Posted by foodforthought, 24/01/2012 9:30:41 AM
Here's a "typical responce"Mr/Mrs live exports must stop.When/if they do, hows abouts you and your visionary mates come over and give us a hand disposing of our thousands of sheep.Why,we could make a day or two or more of it! I'll shoot em and you can chuck em in the loader bucket for me! Then we can all share a ride to the dole office together.Won't that be fun!?
Posted by Hungry?, 24/01/2012 11:24:15 AM
That clown ludwig is more interested in the troll vote than a viable industry.
Posted by R, 24/01/2012 6:58:41 PM
Why should these people have more time? Exporters have sent millions upon millions of animals to their deaths on these ships of 'Shame' for thirty years and it's 'disgusting' they can't give their assurances by March that animals would receive the most basic level of care.Government and the exporters have a duty to protect our animals and that they be treated humanely but it appears they are sadly lacking in any morality or concern.
Posted by Kathleen, 26/01/2012 8:17:23 PM
Thats right Kathleen.We producers and exporters are vial,disgusting,uncareing,bloodthirsty,horrible,foul,filthy,pathetic little paracites that feed on the inhumane treatment of billions of innocent, uncared for animals inorder to make a quick few bucks!We have no sence of morality,and would rather kick a dog to death than pat it,then feast on its blood,not because we are Hungry?but because we can.And without the brainpower and knowledgeable input of so many lovely people such as youself,we will continue to maim,kill,abuse,feast etc..,on as many animals as we can.We should be drowned like rats?
Posted by Hungry?, 27/01/2012 9:55:48 AM
Hungry, you have described yourself to a 'T'. There are many, many farmers who do NOT Live Export, myself included. Perhaps you should speak to them about how to farm animals ethically! It is interesting how live export producers show little concern about the cruelty shown to your animals. Shame!
Posted by Disgusted, 31/01/2012 2:00:59 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Do you wear a helmet when riding your quad bike on the farm?

Yes
(16.1%)

No
(74.5%)

Sometimes
(9.4%)

Total Votes: 310
Poll Date: 16 January, 2012

Most popular articles




The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...