News 
 National Rural News 
 Livestock 
 News 
 Clearing up misconceptions about antibiotic use in animal agriculture 

Clearing up misconceptions about antibiotic use in animal agriculture

20 Feb, 2010 03:00 AM
MEDIA reports associating the use of antibiotics in livestock production with antibiotic resistance in humans are not based on science, an US veterinary professor, Dr Scott Hurd, has said.

Dr Hurd emphasised that pork producers adopted withdrawal periods for antibiotics, which protected the meat supply. The main issue was actually resistant organisms - so Hurd says it is a much bigger, more difficult topic.

In 2000, Denmark implemented a blanket ban on preventative antibiotics. That ban has been repeatedly highlighted in media reports about antibiotic resistance. Hurd, who spent some time in Denmark as the ban was moving forward, is able to offer some perspective on the Danish ban.

"Immediately after that ban, in swine the number of pigs that had to be treated for illness actually doubled and that trend continued for many years after the ban," Hurd said.

"The World Health Organization did a study in 2002 and they said very clearly they could find no evidence that human health has actually improved or that risk has actually been reduced."

The media has unfairly portrayed this as a food safety story. Hurd says an antibiotic ban would actually decrease the health of meat animals entering the food supply.

"Antibiotics and other treatments and management are used in livestock in order to produce healthy animals, which result in healthy food," Hurd said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I am not a scientist by any means - but even if there WERE resistant organisms on meat, wouldn't proper cooking kill them?
Posted by Ellen, 22/02/2010 11:14:42 AM
The dangers of antibiotics in animal feed - When Malaysian Health Minister Datuk Chua Jui Meng revealed that half the chickens sold in the country contained cancer-causing nitrofuran, it reopened a long-standing controversy over the widespread use and dangers of antibiotics in animal feed. Reviewing the debate Martin Khor explains why the use of such drugs in animal feed should be banned or tightly regulated. Is it safe to consume chickens that have been fed antibiotics? This question occupied the attention of Malaysians after revelation in August that half the chickens sold in the local markets may be contaminated with high levels of nitrofuran, an antibiotic known to cause cancer. Health Minister Datuk Chua Jui Meng revealed that a Ministry survey found 51% of the chicken samples bought from various towns to contain nitrofuran at levels up to 4,000% above the Veterinary Department's guideline level. Datuk Chua said his Ministry did not permit nitrofuran in chickens, and criticised the chicken industry for double standards in exporting nitrofuran-free chicken whilst selling unsafe meat locally.
Posted by PM In waiting, 23/02/2010 4:07:38 AM
Firstly an Australian Scientist,who is one of the Fellows of The Australian Academy of Science, was the first scientist to demonstrate the mechanism that enables antibiotic resistance to be passed from one bacteria to another. This is now an ACCEPTED SCIENTIFIC FACT! Secondly bacteria on uncooked meat can confer resistance to anyone handling the meat. So animals fed antibiotics can easily pass on antibiotic resistant bacteria to humans. These bacteria may not in themselves be dangerous BUT they can pass on their antibiotic resistance to dangerous bacteria that infect their human host.
Posted by daisy, 25/02/2010 4:18:56 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
18 February, 2010
19 February, 2010
17 February, 2010
POLL
Q: Have your voting intentions changed since Tony Abbott became leader of the federal Opposition?

Yes - more likely to vote Coalition
(32.2%)

Yes - more likely to vote Labor
(9%)

Yes - more likely to vote for a minor party
(5.7%)

No change - still a Coalition voter
(42.5%)

No change - still a Labor voter
(5.5%)

No change - still a minor party voter
(5.1%)

Total Votes: 870
Poll Date: 14 February, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...