News 
 National Rural News 
 Livestock 
 News 
 Animals Australia launches another anti live-ex campaign 

Animals Australia launches another anti live-ex campaign

28 Oct, 2008 06:23 PM
In its latest assault on the live export industry, Animals Australia is paying for a full-page 'open letter' to be published three rural newspapers this week appealing to sheep producers not to send their animals to the Middle East for the upcoming Eid 'Festival of Sacrifice' to be held between on December 8-10.

Animals Australia says livestock face additional cruelties during this festival when Muslims throughout the Middle East purchase sheep for sacrifice.

Footage obtained in Egypt of Australian sheep sales in the lead up to the Eid prevented further sheep exports into Egypt last year.

Animals Australia executive director, Glenys Oogjes, says the Festival of Sacrifice is "the worst time of the year in the Middle East for animals".

"Our live exporters know it – yet they don't warn farmers, they deliberately keep the truth from them because they know that most farmers would refuse to send their animals to such a fate," she claimed.

"I know that times are tough for farmers especially with the ongoing drought.

"But Animals Australia believes that if animals were being abused like this at a local stockyard that regardless of any extra money on offer, farmers would be outraged and refuse to supply their animals to such treatment.

"We are appealing to farmers to reconsider exporting their animals not only to protect their animals from abuse, but so that the right message is conveyed to the region – that animals and their welfare do matter to Australian farmers and they don’t approve of their livestock being treated this way."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Go you compassionate people at Animals Australia. The trafficking of live animals by Australia is one of the worst cruelties ever inflicted upon any animals by humans. The greed is astounding and the misinformation spread by this parasitic industry is appalling. Never let it be said that truth plays a part when support for the industry is said. Example: This trade has only ever employed under 3000 people, that is people who are directly employed by its existance. But that is not enough so industry ups the numbers to include dentists, doctors and insurance salesmen. Come on. The clock is ticking and this despicable trade is ending.
Posted by Kev, 28/10/2008 7:04:23 PM
Sheep are kicked, quite possibly while bleeding and injured, to be stuffed into car boots or tied onto roof racks. They can be taken home to be slaughtered, while still conscious, at home according to halal religious requirements. Animal Australia has hours of video evidence of sheep being lifted off the boat by their wool, hooves, horns, ears and head! There is no way Australian laws can protect animals in foreign destinations, and there are appalling conditions of handling, transport and slaughter that would not be tolerated in Australia. Animal welfare standards are easily abandoned, or compromised, when the economics are favourable. This industry is purely for profits, and morality and compassion is abandoned.
Posted by Vivienne, 28/10/2008 10:22:16 PM
Live export is not necessary. More money comes into the country via chilled packed export meat. Keep jobs in Australia.
Posted by MJM, 29/10/2008 8:32:08 AM
While I agree with the sentiments, wouldn't the money be better spent for all animal welfare agencies to work together to come up with viable alternatives to live exports, eg chilled meat trade. It's all very well to talk, it's time to do something more constructive.
Posted by adl, 29/10/2008 9:26:09 AM
When will the horror of the live trade end? Nealry 220,000 Australians have signed a petition to stop this barbaric trade. What sort of sadistic people allow it to continue? For that is what it is: sadist, cruel and unnecessary.
Posted by sylvia, 29/10/2008 9:34:43 AM
How can a good Christian like our Prime Minister Kevin Rudd continue to turn a blind eye to this abhorrent and immoral barbaric cruelty? Time for him to again show Australians that he is prepared to do the right and moral thing and ban this despicable trade.
Posted by food4thought, 29/10/2008 9:55:01 AM
How refreshing to see an article where all posted comments are in agreement! In a democratic society, the will of the majority should always be followed, and any politician who turns a blind eye to the truth should start looking for a new job. There are viable alternatives that won't make things any harder for the many struggling farmers, but this requires government intervention and the support of peak farming bodies - get on with it now!
Posted by Paul Vegan, 29/10/2008 10:13:44 AM
This footage is stomach turning and you can only guess what these misfortunate animals think of mankind as they are tied at the ankles, thrown onto roof racks and slit open in a filthy, fanatical part of the world.
Posted by jess, 29/10/2008 11:20:34 AM
The problem with chilled boxed export meat is that a lot of households in countries that Australia live export sheep and cattle to, don't have refrigeration. So it’s like kill one day...eat the next. They don't have the luxuries that we westerners take for granted.
Posted by Ben, 29/10/2008 11:42:37 AM
There is a simple solution to the live export trade. People that oppose this practice simply need to bid for these sheep on the open market, once the sheep have been purchased then they can simply do whatever they please with the animals. That means the animal liberators can set up a chilled meat trade since this is the solution they keep telling us about. This is the easiest way for the live export trade to be stopped: just outbid the exporters and there will be not live export. Farmers will be happy to sell to the highest bidder.
Posted by Don, 29/10/2008 12:37:29 PM
1 | 2 | 3 | 4  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Should there be mandatory labelling laws to advise consumers if food contains ingredients from genetically modified (GM) crops?

Yes
(86.9%)

No
(11.1%)

Undecided
(1.9%)

Total Votes: 1507
Poll Date: 27 October, 2008

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural Northern Beef Week
 
MON0152
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
Photo Library
 
Land Subscriptions
 
Rural Bookshop
 
The Land Facebook


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...