News 
 National Rural News 
 Livestock 
 Cattle 
 Govt to spend $1m to boost animal welfare in live exports 

Govt to spend $1m to boost animal welfare in live exports

6/07/2008 7:34:00 PM
The Rudd Government has now committed more than $1 million to improve animal welfare standards in overseas ports which process Australian live animal exports.

Minister for Agriculture, Tony Burke, says an additional $621,500 has been approved for new projects, bringing the total funding to more than $1 million in the last six months.

The additional funding includes:

· $464,000 to upgrade port holding sheds, port discharge ramps and sheep handling facilities in the Middle East, Indonesia and Russia. Improved infrastructure will reduce livestock stress in transit and reduce the possibility of injury to animals as they are unloaded from ships and moved to feedlots and abattoirs;

· $75,000 to develop training videos, books and signs to be displayed in markets and other areas. Material will be directed at feedlot managers, livestock handlers and transport staff, feedlot stockmen and importers. Material will be provided in English, Arabic, Urdu and Tagalog; and

· $82,500 to install 15 additional restraint boxes in Indonesia, to reduce stress for animals. Indonesia is Australia’s biggest market for exported cattle. This latest approval brings the number of restraining boxes in Indonesia to 90.

Mr Burke said Australia remained committed to world's best practice in animal welfare for live exports.

The Government also recently announced a $7.6 million extension to the Live Animal Trade Program over four years, to further invest in training, education and infrastructure improvement and continue a counsellor position in Dubai to support increased exports to the Middle East.

Live exports are an important part of a vibrant livestock sector in Australia, generating $730 million in earnings annually and supporting more than 10,000 rural and regional jobs.

Send to a Friend
Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


There is no way animals sent to countries where there are no standards of animal welfare can be supervised so that their transport, handling and killing is humane. They are abandoned to atrocities, and have their throats sliced while still conscious for halal rituals. This atrocious trade should be banned and replaced by frozen meat. It is all about maximising profits, and greed, and the expense of duty of care for animals.
Posted by animal-lover on 7/07/2008 11:46:57 AM
There is no way to stop animal cruelty in the live export industry other than banning it. Have three decades taught you people nothing? It certainly demonstrates how far Kevin Rudd was prepared to go to get elected "I cannot abide cruelty", said he. Great Christian, great hypocrite.
Posted by Nicky on 7/07/2008 2:20:03 PM
Well, that is a begining. If only....this is apparently wishful thinking....the meat could be exported "on the hook, not on the hoof"!
Posted by Joan on 7/07/2008 5:00:49 PM
What a waste of money! Just end live animal exports for mercy's sake!
Posted by Sally on 7/07/2008 5:11:33 PM
no shortage of angry people here. BY exporting & trading with these people we improve their domestic handling. Standing on a hill & calling them god-less heathens will get nowhere. Why are you people against farmers making a profit or Free enterprise?
Posted by THE FARMER on 8/07/2008 2:39:20 PM
I think we are all tired of farmers whingeing about their profits at a cost of fundamental human decency. There is no excuse - ever - for the appalling cruelty of the live export trade. You people KNOW what happens to your animals, and couldn't care less. Why should the Australian community care about you?
Posted by Nicky on 9/07/2008 6:38:21 PM
Animal export, and the meat trade in general, is government-approved and tax-supported animal abuse. Boycott cruelty, go vegan.
Posted by MaryF on 9/07/2008 6:41:24 PM
Obviously animal welfare improvements are important, but animal production systems reach a point beyond which more money for animal welfare will not result in substantial improvements. The best way to avoid suffering is to abolish long distance transport. See www.handlewithcare.tv
Posted by Wesharethisplanet on 11/07/2008 8:10:02 PM
To "The Farmer", no-one on this forum objected to you making a livelihood from farming, so long as the animals are treated humanely. What difference does it make to you whether the meat is shipped refrigerated? Perhaps you have a vested interest in the Live export trade. Further we the taxpayer are subsidising a commercially unviable trade that is encouraging cruelty. Perhaps you missed your vocation and would more enjoy working in a Middle Eastern abattoir. You obviously have no conscience.
Posted by Tony S on 24/07/2008 3:36:55 PM
1

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: How do you rate the effectiveness of the current exceptional circumstances drought assistance program?

Excellent
(8.1%)

Good
(17.2%)

Average
(17.7%)

Poor
(24.7%)

Terrible
(32.3%)

Total Votes: 344
Poll Date: 6/07/2008

17/08/2008 | The Federal Government has bolstered the cash available to buy back water licences, the greens have published their wishlist of properties to be targeted, and the drought has more farmers than ever classing themselves as 'willing sellers'. But after the water is gone, has anyone wondered what happens next?
FSA Expo
 
Beef Weeks entries
 
Farm Inventor
 
FSA online
 
JB Fairfax Scholarship
 
FET
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
Land Subscriptions