News 
 National Rural News 
 Livestock 
 Cattle 
 FMD: What the Beale report recommends 

FMD: What the Beale report recommends

23 Dec, 2008 01:02 PM
Live strains of foot and mouth disease (FMD) will soon be brought into Australia, having been recommended to the Government, for the purposes of research, in the report from a major review of Australia's quarantine, released last week.

The review, headed up by former head of the Department of Environment Roger Beale, made 84 recommendations to largely overhaul existing quarantine and biosecurity systems in Australia. All have been accepted in principle, by the Federal Government.

But alarm bells are ringing over a recommendation to abandon a 30-year ban on the import of live viruses and allow samples of foot and mouth disease into Australia to help develop tests and vaccines to combat the disease within Australia. (See separate story).

This is despite last year's outbreak of FMD disease in the United Kingdom which spread from an animal health research laboratory.

The report states: "The import of positive control samples (including the FMD virus) for use in laboratory, diagnostic research and capacity building for exotic disease pathogens is vital and should be permitted under strict import permit conditions to laboratories such as the Australian Animal Health Laboratory."

It goes further to explain that new national priorities should be developed in relation to new technologies, diagnostic research and vaccines.

"The (review) panel was provided with evidence that access to exotic pest and disease material to develop these tests and vaccines is important, but currently difficult," the Beale report says.

Minister for Agriculture, Tony Burke, has not commented on the specific recommendation to import the live FMD virus.

But in its initial, written response to the report, the Federal Government gave in-principle agreement to this and all other recommendations in the Beale report.

"The Commonwealth intends to implement the research and training recommendations in consultation with relevant experts and providers," the Government's response said.

Mr Burke said last week that the Productivity Commission has forecast a hit to the Australian livestock sector of between $8 billion and $13 billion if FMD entered Australia, making the case for the need for robust biosecurity arrangements.

National Farmers Federation last week welcomed the review and its recommendations, but chief executive, Ben Fargher, was unaware of the live virus import suggestion, or its Government approval, when it was brought to his attention this week.

Many farm lobby groups, too, have also welcomed a long-awaited overhaul of the country's quarantine and biosecurity.

Neither Cattle Council of Australia nor Sheepmeat Council of Australia raised concerns of the live FMD virus recommendation in their statements to the media last week.

However, NSW Farmers Association quarantine spokesman, Peter Carter, said alarm bells should be ringing loudly with every livestock producer in the country.

Mr Carter said the Government must reject this recommendation because even with the most rigorous of import arrangements guarding the disease's use for research in Australia, human error would always be a problem.

In a letter to The Land newspaper this week, Mr Carter said, "the FMD virus has been given a magnificent Christmas present in that instead of having to come to Australia in frozen meat or even on somebody's shoes, it will now fly first class".

"Once here at Australian Animal Health Laboratory, it will only be a small step away from devastating Australia's livestock population."

Mr Carter said FMD has escaped from several purpose-built facilities many times, and each time has been because of human error, equipment failure or both.

"This is the exact escape route used by Newcastle disease virus to exit AAHL in 1987," Mr Carter said.

NSW Liberal Senator and a quarantine crusader of sorts, Bill Heffernan, said given the well-documented record of human failure when it comes to AQIS and biosecurity failures in Australia and elsewhere, any move to bring the foot and mouth virus onto the mainland should be rejected immediately.

"There is no reason why research can't be carried out in co-operation with other nations in the countries where the disease is already present," Senator Heffernan said.

"We should be able to secure access to the scientific work that is already going on, and if need be send some of our Australian scientists overseas to be part of it. Just don't bring the disease in here."

Senator Heffernan said the recommendation highlights why a Senate Inquiry should be held to examine the implications of all the recommendations before they are implemented.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Wasn't the EI issue enough? Australia has held an FMD free status for years and for us to continue supplying the high quality beef that we do, we need to take every measure to ensure our status remains the same.

Yes, it may be wise to research a live FMD strain, but no one can provide fool proof guarantee against human error. All it takes is for a staff member to cut a tiny corner in protocol and it could be unleashed into Australia's currently FMD free atmosphere.

EI was a big problem but FMD in Australia would be a catastrophe.

It's not just cattle FMD affects, but all cloven hoof animals. Imagine if such a disease takes hold of our lamb industry? Or how about the buffalo farms and big cattle runs up north, where mustering is done once a year by helicopter? The area is vast up there and little monitering is done. Did Beale look at this prospect?

Or was he just trying to seem like he was doing something for the greater good? It is an absolute ludicrous proposal.

Posted by Bec, 23/12/2008 2:09:41 PM
It is an absolute farce that this Beale report can endorse the importation of live FMD virus. Minister Burke should look closely at three notable failures of biosecurity in recent years: firstly the outbreak of Equine Influenza in NSW and QLD, secondly the accidental 'escape' of the FMD virus from the UK government's research facility at Pirbright, and thirdly the 'escape' of Rabbit Calicivirus (RCV) from Wardang Island.

No matter what biosecurity measures are put in place, there is a real threat of FMD virus escaping from any research facility.

I am astounded by the way biosecurity has been mishandled in this beautiful country of ours:

1. Callinan inquiry finds incompetent AQIS manager at Eastern Creek facility (NSW) couldn't implement and/or enforce rudimentary biosecurity measures that would have prevented escape of EI virus from quarantine facility;

2. Beale inquiry recommends disbanding of AQIS and formation of a new authority to be staffed by same incompetent AQIS people outed by the Callinan inquiry;

3. Same (apparently incompetent) AQIS people (now working for National Biosecurity Authority) to oversee importation of FMD virus and compliance with importation conditions.

If these authorities could not adhere to basic biosecurity measures in the case of the EI outbreak, how on earth can the Government possibly entertain the thought of these same people managing the importation of FMD?!

I agree with Sen. Heffernan in that the scientists at AAHL should instead perform their important research oversees where FMD exists.

The Government already supports a FMD project that AAHL scientists are a part of, in collaboration with scientists from China and Laos. Let these scientists continue working under the current ACIAR arrangements but do not allow them to bring the virus back to Australia.

Our agriculture is too important to play with and we cannot afford any more stuff-ups by any authority!

Posted by Hadley, 23/12/2008 5:19:19 PM
In addition to what Hadley has said, I remember a couple of years ago watching a live TV story about tainted beef that had been imported from Brazil (or one of its neighbours) and finished up in the Wagga dump.

The AQIS people being quizzed by Sen Heffernan at the time didn't have any good answers and all appeared to be ducking for cover. It's ridiculous to even consider bringing in the virus.

Posted by Will, 24/12/2008 4:15:23 PM
The sensible solution would be to pay for the research to be done outside of Australia. Do not risk having any live virus in this country. Our disease-free status is a huge asset to be protected.
Posted by spinel, 27/12/2008 5:42:31 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
These animals are at threat if FMD escaped into the Australian cattle industry - and so would be all of our billion-dollar beef export industry.
These animals are at threat if FMD escaped into the Australian cattle industry - and so would be all of our billion-dollar beef export industry.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Which Aussie farm produce will be part of your Christmas feast?

Pork
(16.3%)

Turkey
(14.8%)

Beef
(7.1%)

Lamb
(8.7%)

Seafood
(13.5%)

All of the above
(32.9%)

None of the above
(6.6%)

Total Votes: 392
Poll Date: 19 December, 2008

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...