News 
 National Rural News 
 Livestock 
 Cattle 
 BFA responds to Choice concerns on organic meat 

BFA responds to Choice concerns on organic meat

02 Aug, 2009 05:00 AM
IN response to Choice claims of butchers possibly selling products as organic that may in some instances not be, Biological Farmers of Australia (BFA) reminds consumers to always look for certification logos such as the ‘Bud’, with the words ‘Australian Certified Organic’.

“Educated organic consumers understand and appreciate the often premium prices they pay for organic products,” says Dr Andrew Monk, BFA chair of the Standards Advisory Group.

"The price of Australian Certified Organic (ACO) products reflects the value behind one of the world’s most stringent agricultural and food standards: the Australian Organic Standard (AOS)

"The AOS mandates certification being independent third party auditing, for use of such organic logos as the organic ‘Bud’ logo, Australia’s most recognised organic logo.

"Unless either products or retailers, including butchers, who sell bulk (non-packaged) items are certified, and bear clear certification reference, consumers should steer well clear."

This is similar to the Heart Tick for health claims, notes Monk, where such a logo is also voluntary and not backed by legislation.

“The good news for consumers is that the organic industry in Australia has a proud history stretching over two decades, of voluntary self regulation through independent third party auditing and certification to industry owned organic standards," he says.

Anyone buying cheap, unmarked products or products from non-certified facilities is ultimately only kidding themselves, while also missing out on the whole point about organics: foods and fibres with integrity.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I find this article so annoying...it presumes that all non-certified organic food is evil and does not conform to the Australian standard. This couldn't be further from the truth. We should never have allowed the Australian standard to require independent auditing...it is costly and places unnecessary administrative burden on the producers....all the other standards that farmers comply with are self assessed, why should organic farming be different?

I strongly believe that the cost and availability of organic produce would benefit from changing the legislation to allow for self assessment.

Posted by phil, 13/08/2009 9:33:59 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
30 July, 2009
POLL
Q: Has the Federal Government got the balance right between water buybacks and investment in more efficient irrigation infrastructure in the Murray Darling?

Yes
(3.8%)

No - there should be more investment in infrastructure
(73.8%)

No - there should be more emphasis on water buybacks
(13.7%)

Undecided
(8.7%)

Total Votes: 416
Poll Date: 26 July, 2009

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...