News 
 National Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 Nats 'own goal' on wheat marketing 

Nats 'own goal' on wheat marketing

12 Nov, 2009 09:51 AM
NATIONAL party members attacking the timing of the Productivity Commission’s wheat marketing review have no-one to blame but themselves, according to Federal Minister for Agriculture Tony Burke.

Mr Burke launched a scathing counter-attack on shadow minister for agriculture, National Party member John Cobb, who last week lambasted Mr Burke for the timing of the review over the harvest period, and calling for the review’s time constraints to be relaxed.

Mr Burke claimed that the narrow time frame of the review was caused by a Coalition amendment to the Wheat Export Marketing Bill, and said in the Government’s original draft, the review would have commenced in 2010 and continued through into 2011.

“The Opposition amended the legislation to fix a hard deadline of July 1, 2010, meaning the Productivity Commission must begin its consultation before the end of the year to meet the deadline.”

He said Mr Cobb had egg on his face over his statement, in which he said “anyone with the slightest knowledge of the wheat industry in Australia knows that November through December is the busiest time of the year for grain growers”.

“This is a classic ‘own goal’ by the Nationals and John Cobb,” Mr Burke said.

“Mr Cobb thought he was being tough on the Government, but he was actually criticising his Opposition colleagues from the Liberal and National parties.

“The Nationals claimed to have strong views on the wheat reforms – now no one knows what they believe.”

In Parliament, Mr Burke delivered a broadside intended specifically for the National Party, who he accused of living in the past on wheat marketing.

“While I will admit that the Liberal Party did play a constructive role generally in dealing with the wheat marketing issues, the Nationals would be better off getting the parents on the sideline to say ‘No, you are meant to be running that way.’

“Instead, we have a party that is still pining for the days when wheat farmers were told who they had to sell to.”

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The real issue is Burke's wheat marketing dogs breakfast, one that the wheat industry is now reeling from.

So Burke now is in damage control. Watch growers walk away from the industry on mass next year.

Posted by what the, 12/11/2009 4:50:56 PM
Burke has made a lot of statements of how good a deregulated export wheat market is for growers, with additional money being paid to growers. Where is the evidence you use, Mr Burke?

You are being misled by the same people who told you farmers would be better off. Wheat prices are below the cost of production when you add on all the dysfunction and additional freight costs and still I see no evidence of additional buyer copetition at the local silo.

Is this damage control Mr Burke? Or have you got your head in the sand hiding from the truth of the destruction of the wheat industry with the drop in price dropping the price of other grains? I, like many others, will not plant next year with the current export market being crippled.

Posted by disgusted, 13/11/2009 7:25:07 AM
Apart from the comments typical of the seat warming numbers man Burke, the other issue here for growers and rural Australians is whether John Cobb is the right bloke for the job. This is the man who orchestrated the removal of single desk marketing from the Nats policy statement earlier this year. He'd be better off in the Libs with Alby Schultz, Heffernan and Tuckey.
Posted by mark2, 13/11/2009 9:57:42 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
“This is a classic ‘own goal’ by the Nationals and John Cobb,” Tony Burke says.
“This is a classic ‘own goal’ by the Nationals and John Cobb,” Tony Burke says.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
11 November, 2009
12 November, 2009
POLL
Q: Has the emissions trading debate changed your voting intentions?

More likely to vote Labor
(10.5%)

More likely to vote Coalition
(47.2%)

Less likely to vote Labor
(12%)

Less likely to vote Coalition
(3.2%)

No change
(21.8%)

Other
(5.4%)

Total Votes: 685
Poll Date: 08 November, 2009

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...