News 
 National Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 GM wheat worth it: Monsanto 

GM wheat worth it: Monsanto

22 Nov, 2009 06:05 PM
MONSANTO’S director of research Harvey Glick has urged Australian growers to be patient in the wait for genetically modified (GM) wheats.

The multi-national biotech business has recently recommissioned its GM wheat research, but Dr Glick warns growers that it will be some time before the fruits of the research translate to a commercial GM wheat variety.

Much has been made in the Australian rural media of promising advances with ‘synthetic’ wheats, which could incorporate traits from wild relatives that could improve drought and frost tolerance, but Dr Glick says internationally GM research is lagging behind that for other commodities.

“Compared to corn and soybeans, there has not been the same investment in wheat research," he says.

“Wheat plants have a complex make-up and it is a slow process to make things happen.”

“We have restarted our research program, but things won’t happen overnight.”

Dr Glick said advances in wheat breeding needed to utilise both conventional and GM breeding techniques.

“We are seeing high yielding traits being developed conventionally, and over time we hope to take these traits and add useful biotechnology traits to boost the varieties.

“There is a lot of really good research being done at places like CSIRO and hopefully we can work together with them to develop commercial varieties for farmers," he says.

“Monsanto admit we don’t have all the expertise we need in the wheat field, and we are reaching out for partners to create the best solutions.”

He says the roll-out of drought tolerant corn and soybeans will take place first, but said Australian growers may eventually see some benefits from the traits developed for these species crossing over into wheat, Australia’s major grain crop.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
As Harvey Glick identifies wheat is a very complex plant compared to corn. Wheat breeders around the world that I have spoken to personally have told me that the greatest benefit with GM is in pre breeding. i.e. speeding up the selection process. I listened to a presentation the other day from a fellow who had visited with Monsanto in the US and those working on this technology are saying that regarding wheat and drought tolerance that the best improvement they can see possible is around 10% and that is a long way off, if it is achievable due to wheat's complexity. CSIRO, GRDC and any other organization should be very cautious about getting into bed with the Monsantos of the world. We have world class research going on in Australia and you can be sure that Monsanto will look after Monsanto first and US interest second. The US wheat associates are travelling the world in particular Canada, Argentina and Australia trying to get grower organisations to back GM wheat so that we as Australian growers don’t get any advantage from exporting GM free wheat to the world. I however have no problem with the technology if it is tested independently.
Posted by Graingrower, 22/11/2009 9:35:37 AM, on The Land
There will be a massive problem if all these pigs fly over the city! Trust – A confident reliance on the integrity, honesty, or justice of another; faith. I know in whom I would NOT be placing my trust!
Posted by ggwagga, 23/11/2009 7:21:55 AM, on Stock & Land
Roundup resistant weeds, insecticide resistant insects - Monsanto's GM world won't last much longer. Don't ruin Australian food and exports by going down a path wanted by NOBODY except commerically funded researchers, patent holders, and US farmers hoping for wheat subsidies to compete with high-subsidy corn and soy. Starve out the GM before it starves out us.
Posted by Madeleine Love, 23/11/2009 3:54:10 PM, on Farm Weekly
If it only produces 10% better yield then any farmer that is going to produce this GM wheat will go broke as when you pay technology fees, increase in the price of seed, and any other fee that they want to put on, the farmer will make a loss and will regret planting it. Concerning Australia not getting any benefit from being non-GM, that's because nowhere in the world is GM wheat in production. Australia will get an advantage with non-GM wheat if GM wheat is grown elsewhere. Monsanto previously has said that GM canola would yield 30-40% better than non-GM variety and that has not come to fruition. If they are saying now that only 10% better yield with wheat then you can bet your bottom dollar that this will not come to fruition either. Consumers do not want GM in their food. You can avoid soy, you can avoid GM corn from America, you can avoid sugar beet from America but if you contaminate our wheat, what are consumers going to eat? They have always said they do not want GM. Monsanto has just been sued by the French government.
Posted by Vicki Wilson, 23/11/2009 4:45:26 PM, on Farm Weekly
And what happens when the Monsanto GM wheat infests the non GM wheat next farm down? He loses the farm. Same as they did in America.
Posted by Not Green, 23/11/2009 8:49:46 PM, on Queensland Country Life
Of course Monsanto is a public company that needs to make money. Usually, that is how you stay in business. But to say that farmers using any new technology will go broke is ridiculous and irresponsible. Farmers will not be forced to buy these technologies...they have choice. If it doesn't pencil out for them, they will not buy it...simple as that.
Posted by jjdoubleJ, 24/11/2009 12:45:26 AM, on Stock & Land
I have no problem with development of GM wheats as long as the traits developed bring benefits to growers or in the end use. I will never grow a Roundup-Ready wheat as that will only benefit the chemical companies. I feel the arsenal we have at our disposal for control of weeds in wheat is sufficient to not need RR varieties. I value the RR trait in canola that we grow on the farm here in Canada but hesitate to grow RR soybeans - sooner or later there is going to be a major resistance issue with Roundup in a significant weed and I feel the use of in crop glyphosate 1 year in 4 as well as annual pre-seed burndowns is as much as I want to use.
Posted by lepoubelle, 24/11/2009 2:26:07 AM, on The Land
We do not need or want GM food!! Especially not GM wheat!!!! Biological farming can and will provide a base for more sustainable agriculture with higher yields, if given the chance.
Posted by natureisbest, 25/11/2009 1:18:27 PM, on The Land
Farmers will not be forced to buy these technologies...they have choice. If it doesn't pencil out for them, they will not buy it...simple as that. Problem is that similar to the canola and corn scam, the farmer that doesn't want it, gets contamianted and sued by Monsanto, and as this year's fiasco over NO segregation - increased cost for testing to PROVE NON GM status, increased storage costs for separation, and there goes the $15 a tonne premium NON GM gets. Glyphosate can taint soils for as long as 180+ days, we have resistant weeds now. And health issues re DNA damage are being raised. Argentina wants to BAN GM, on the results of their research, into the harmful effects of it. The Carrier unlabelled as to what? Can vary, and is often more toxic than the glyphosate is. Beware! No one BUT Monsanto wants it, and they want your money, they couldn't give a stuff about you or your land. Your kids end up with..? dead soils and rampant weed issues, wonderful for whom? Oh and I would not eat any wheat products I don't grow if GM is released, many feel the same.
Posted by amicus curiae, 26/11/2009 10:53:33 PM, on Stock Journal
Glyphosate tainting soil. What a load of rubbish. Glyphostate is essential in controlling weeds and retaining stubble cover. Resistance can be prevented and managed. What's your alternative weed control? Plough, plough! Goodbye water holding capacity, moisture, earthworms, soil health, topsoil. Hello diesel, tractor hours, plough pans, crop failures, dust storms!
Posted by zero till, 27/11/2009 7:24:49 PM, on The Land
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
16 November, 2009
18 November, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you believe your farm business can profit from an emissions trading scheme?

Yes
(20.3%)

No
(70.1%)

Undecided
(9.6%)

Total Votes: 606
Poll Date: 15 November, 2009

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural Northern Beef Week
 
MON0152
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
Photo Library
 
Land Subscriptions
 
Rural Bookshop
 
The Land Facebook


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...