News 
 National Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 GM canola found outside containment area 

GM canola found outside containment area

25 Sep, 2009 05:25 AM
GENETICALLY modified canola has escaped from its containment areas in southern NSW, just over a year after a moratorium on growing the crop was lifted by the State Government.

Canola matching a genetically altered strain patented by the agribusiness giant Monsanto was found growing beside the Riverina Highway, and apparently at other locations, near Jerilderie.

Many farmers who decided not to grow Monsanto's modified "Roundup Ready" canola are concerned that their commercial status as GM-free producers is compromised, and believe the apparent biosecurity breach may threaten export earnings.

"The problem is that farmers will end up growing GM canola whether we want to or not," said Jerilderie farmer Gay Marshall, who found the stray GM plants near the farm she runs with her husband Dick.

She sent them for testing at a commercial laboratory.

When the moratorium on the GM strain was lifted in March 2008, the Government promised the strain would not get mixed in with the traditional crop.

"GM canola will be segregated from non-GM canola - people will know what they are eating," the Primary Industries Minister, Ian Macdonald, said at the time.

However, the biggest grain handler, Graincorp, announced in May that it would be mixing the crops together. This means that processed foods that use canola oil, including many types of biscuits, potato chips and baby food, will soon contain some genetically modified material.

It is regarded as safe for human consumption by the Commonwealth Office of the Gene Technology Regulator.

But farmers who were planning to retain their GM-free status are now concerned that there is no way to stop GM seeds getting into their fields.

Asked if the discovery constituted a biosecurity breach, Mr Macdonald said in a statement that stray roadside plants were easily destroyed by slashing them down or with herbicides.

"This everyday occurrence is taken into account when industry standards and protocols are developed for supply chains," Mr Macdonald said.

Responsibility for managing roadside weeds fell to the Roads and Traffic Authority, he said.

Asked if contamination of non-GM crops would affect exports, he said: "This issue is irrelevant to export opportunities because there are established markets for both GM canola and conventional canola."

Monsanto's statement to the Sydney Morning Herald on the issue contained some of the same phrases used by Mr Macdonald.

A spokeswoman for Monsanto, Honi McNaughton, said that although the company had sued farmers overseas for producing crops with its patented genes after their fields were contaminated, that would not happen in Australia.

"We're not going to be pursuing anybody for growing a couple of plants in their fields," she said. "Those people we have acted against in the past are people that have illegally saved seeds and used it without paying us for our intellectual property."

The non-GM group Biological Farmers of Australia said experience with GM canola in Canada showed that within a few years the majority of the canola crop would be completely interlinked with GM material.

The Network of Concerned Farmers said there were reports of modified canola taking root in wheat and other crops.

"It was always inevitable that there would be contamination by GM canola once the moratorium was lifted," a spokeswoman, Juliet McFarlane, said. "The idea that we were going to get a choice about growing GM canola was always a joke.''

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Surprise surprise, once again the multinationals win!
Posted by Walta Coggy, 25/09/2009 7:53:01 AM
The governments are not looking after Australians or farmers interests by allowing GM. GM is anti-Australian, pro big business
Posted by Paul, 25/09/2009 10:12:16 AM
This is a national disgrace. The governmnet by allowing GM crops has resigned Australia to the list of also rans.
Posted by Tonypolony, 25/09/2009 6:52:16 PM
I read an article about the proactive marketing of GM food which parallels another from a university in South Australia about a year back. It suggests that 'GM foods have entered the market without any choice being offered to consumers'. The article later showed a number of examples of how the biotech companies proactively market GM technology and foods. Contamination has to be the best and cheapest way for them to do this. It is an international lie in fact and a national disgrace as the previous commenter suggested. God willing forums all over the country will eventually uncover the lie to enough people to stop the government and these companies. People, visit the true food networks on your web, see what's on and act now while there is time.
Posted by michelle, 25/09/2009 8:57:26 PM
The contamination problem will be of concern to some growers but we don’t have to worry about the GM canola oil. The oil, whether it is from non-GM or GM canola crops contains no protein or DNA as these are removed in the refining process. Similarly there is no GM or non-GM protein or DNA in soy and cottonseed oils. No problems with the culinary use of the GM oils.
Posted by humphrey, 25/09/2009 9:33:02 PM
This debacle, like Minister Macdonald, is totally inappropriate and dangerous. Macdonald and Monsanto have far too much power than they deserve, at the detriment of the rest of us. GM, and Macdonald as minister, have no place in this fine country.
Posted by brett sanders, 26/09/2009 9:35:49 AM
Surprise, surprise. Now that it has escaped we have another difficult, if not impossible to control weed. Obviously Macdonald couldn't give a damn about Aussie farmers and their future. Not only that but any hope of gaining a world market for GM free is also lost.
Posted by don w, 26/09/2009 8:52:53 PM
Have a close look at the humble tomato, tough inedible skin to withstand handling and storage, uniform colour to look good, smooth blemish free skin to feel good, uniform size to reduce the throwaways and coded genetically to resist boring and nibbling pests. The next step in the tomato biotechnology? To make them square, sandwich size and wrinkly grosse lisse will fade into the archives. Sorry reader, I got a bit carried away. Maythorpe barley, the favourite beer barley was zapped by the British Atomic Energy Commission in the '50s to fix the harvesting problems. Golden Rice, a GM rice funded by the Rockefeller Foundation for vitamin A, the main case of blind children in the tropics. Yellow pine plantations in Brazil of GM stock producing 35cm per hectare in the same time that originals produced only 3.5 cm. So what is so special about GM Canola? The Japanese are the main market extracting the oil and feeding the pulp residue to livestock. The GM tomato is exported to Asia, the genetically altered beer is consumed in huge amounts for more than 50 years and the yellow pine is here in big packing crates. Should we ban the wheel? Think about the damage caused since that was invented.
Posted by Robert Stewart, 28/09/2009 5:28:11 AM
The Office of Gene Technology Regulator tells us GM food is perfectly safe to eat. And it's hard to deny this. Because no long term tests on the effects of GM food on human beings have ever been done. Ever. But it's worth pointing that since GM foods were released (untested) onto the US market the incidence of food related deaths and diseases has doubled. Coincidence? It could be. No way of checking.
Posted by john Newton, 28/09/2009 8:37:18 AM
Apparently a kid in the tropics would have to eat several kilos of golden rice a day to get as much vitamin A as a leaf of spinach provides. Kids need gardens not genetic technology that produce proteins that have never been seen before on planet Earth and are causing allergic reactions in research animals. Minister Monsanto, sorry, MacDonald and his friend McNaughton should hand pull or slash GM canola weeds on roadsides from dawn to dusk till they have cleaned up this massive threat to agriculture he has allowed. Sorry Honi, none of your harmful costly herbicides...environmentally friendly eradication methods only, thanks.
Posted by Merri Bee, 28/09/2009 8:40:00 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
24 September, 2009
23 September, 2009
POLL
Q: Can plant and animal breeders produce enough food to meet future global needs without the development of new genetically modified crops?

Yes
(53%)

No
(41.8%)

Undecided
(5.2%)

Total Votes: 668
Poll Date: 20 September, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...