News 
 National Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 Drought-tolerant GM corn by 2012: Monsanto 

Drought-tolerant GM corn by 2012: Monsanto

06 Nov, 2009 04:00 AM
MONSANTO’S director of scientific affairs Harvey Glick has shrugged off suggestions genetic modification advances have stalled and has predicted a boom period for biotech products as the 'second generation' of traits becomes available to growers.

"I think we are just at the beginning of an exciting period, with crops being rolled out with new traits, especially in soybeans and corn," Dr Glick said.

Canada-based Dr Glick said that it was not just more of the same herbicide resistance traits either.

"We are working on more nitrogen efficient and drought tolerant lines, as well as oilseeds with higher oil levels."

He dismissed claims that many of the new traits being developed were being done by conventional breeding regardless of genetic modification.

"It's not fair to say its just being done with conventional traits."

And work is still being done on perfecting existing traits.

"Take a look at Roundup Ready soybeans," he said. "Roundup Ready is one of the most widely planted traits, but we are not just taking old varieties and adding a new trait, we are developing a whole new technology, an improved version of glyphosate resistance.

"Yields have been between eight and 11 percent higher."

However, the Australian farming public’s real interest in new traits comes down to one thing, and Dr Glick, in Australia for the recent Australian Biotech Conference, said drought tolerant GM varieties of corn and cotton would be available by 2012.

"Corn will be the first drought-tolerant crop to hit the market, hopefully in 2012, depending on regulatory approval," he said.

He said the news was not likely to wildly excite Aussie growers, who produce a negligible amount of corn, but said GM drought resistant cotton would be a boon in Australian conditions.

Nitrogen efficient GM lines would also fulfil a role in improving the environment, Dr Glick claimed.

"With reduced N application we will have less run-off of nitrogen into waterways, it will have a lot of environmental benefits, as well as agronomic."

Armed with a strong suite of products aimed at solving these environmental problems, Dr Glick said he was confident public perception of GM products was changing.

"I am quite encouraged by what I see of late; we no longer we have the luxury of ignoring GM as a means to feed the world.

"Everybody knows the issues of food security and protecting the environment.

"Consumers understand the challenge of feeding the world, they want food that is more sustainable, that uses less water, energy and pesticide.

"That is what the combination of breeding and biotech is providing."

Dr Glick said that while anti-GM campaigners could have their own view on things, they had not come up with a clear solution.

"They are entitled to their own opinion, but they have not come up with any solutions to the food security issue."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
All GM crops are an invitation to disaster of monumental proportions. To be dependent on such a narrow species and varietal base is suicidal.

GM crops will not help farmers become sustainable. There are too many risks and dangers with GMOs and it's time farmers and government officials woke up to the deception.

Posted by ggwagga, 6/11/2009 7:43:38 AM, on Stock & Land
After thirty years of producing a seed capable of allowing farmers to pump as much of a poison that we now know is dangerous to the environment - glyphosate - the biotech movement is still promising to feed the world and drought resistance - soon. Dream on Dr Glick but don't expect us to swallow your bovine fertiliser for much longer.
Posted by john Newton, 6/11/2009 8:02:52 AM, on The Land
So Monsanto will push to release more GM products which, just like canola has, will spread themselves throughout non GM plantings. Do people really want no choice but to eat GM food? I know I don't!!
Posted by nogm!!, 6/11/2009 9:00:19 AM, on The Land
Please ggwagga - get off your soapbox - a disaster of monumental proportions??? It's a canola plant, not the earth's atmosphere, or the sun. And there is no evidence of any damage to humans or the environment after over a decade of production and over a trillion meals. And doesn't adding a new genetic trait to a crop increase biodiversity? In any case that issue is about monoculture agriculture and is a different issue to GM. I'll just say you are not going to feed many people with permaculture. You are honestly saying that drought-tolerant crops would not make farming more sustainable in Australia? And nogm, can you show some evidence that GM has spread through non-GM canola crops?
Posted by David, 6/11/2009 9:28:45 AM, on The Land
Well I can't afford to waste money buying expensive food. If Monsanto can help stop food prices rising during droughts, I'm all for it. You rich sceptics never think about anyone but yourself.
Posted by dickytiger, 6/11/2009 9:33:21 AM, on The Land
There is no doubt that these agronomic traits can benefit production levels, Australia had some of the best people and growers doing exciting things with Integrated Pest Managment in the cotton industry, Other countries had major production issues, we hailed Bt Cotton as another tool in our IPM. Now other countries are producing much more cotton because of these technologies, the world price has fallen, and we can't afford to grow cotton without GM. I was all for Bt traits, glyphosate resistant traits etc, but in hind sight growers aren't making any more money out of the products, we are now forced to grow GM because of a low commodity price and Monsanto has set itself up as indispensible in the world's cotton seed distribution. Will drought-tolerant crops such as corn lift production levels, force down feed grain prices, and back us growers into a corner where we have to grow GM feeds to compete?
Posted by maxSmart, 6/11/2009 9:45:52 AM, on Queensland Country Life
Can someone please explain to me what these disasters of "monumental proportions" are with relation to GM crops? I don't remember hearing of any.
Posted by Al, 6/11/2009 10:33:37 AM, on Stock & Land
The truth to be known, Monsanto's only goal is control...Try working with nature...not against it!
Posted by Brett Rutter, 6/11/2009 11:52:49 AM, on Queensland Country Life
David, you obviously didn't pay much attention to history, especially the potato famine in Ireland. Or perhaps you need to visit an ophthalmologist and get your eyesight tested. I made no reference to "GM conola". But then again you could benefit from a visit to an otorhinolaryngologist who can refer you to an audiologist to check your hearing. You obviously have a problem with selective sight and hearing. The evidence is substantial against GMOs, they are unsafe, unsustainable and unnecessary. Anyone who believes otherwise is extremely naive, ignorant or has a vested interest in perpetuating the deception. There is a mountain of evidence that clearly demonstrates the consumption of GM has a seriously detrimental impact on the health of the unwise consumer.
Posted by ggwagga, 6/11/2009 6:39:47 PM, on Stock & Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
04 November, 2009
03 November, 2009
04 November, 2009
06 November, 2009
05 November, 2009
MULTIMEDIA
04 November, 2009
POLL
Q: Should the Nationals and Liberals dissolve the Federal Coalition?

Yes
(47.1%)

No
(46%)

Undecided
(6.8%)

Total Votes: 526
Poll Date: 01 November, 2009

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural Northern Beef Week
 
MON0152
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
Photo Library
 
Land Subscriptions
 
Rural Bookshop
 
The Land Facebook


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...