News 
 National Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 Burke backs GM wheat 

Burke backs GM wheat

29 Jul, 2009 10:35 AM
FEDERAL minister for agriculture Tony Burke gave proponents of GM technology a strong leg-up with a ringing endorsement of genetically modified crops at his address yesterday at the Australian Grains Industry Conference.

There was also an assurance to the pro-GM lobby in South Australia, the grain-producing state with the strongest State Government opposition to GM and where a moratorium against GM production is still in place, that he had made his views known to the SA government.

"It's a decision that is totally up to them, but they know what I think on this one," Mr Burke said.

"I see GM as a positive. It's obviously not going to be the be all and end all of providing world food security, but it is a piece of the jigsaw.

"Biotech is a massive field and the synergies between researchers is likely to be a boost for the world production."

Mr Burke said that he believed there was growing grower approval of GM lines and, while acknowledging some market resistance, he said he did not believe this was an absolute.

"You can see that markets that will not buy GM grain have no issue with livestock fed on GM grain," he said.

However, the news on GM was not so good from representatives of south-east Asian wheat buyers at the conference.

While GM wheat lines were a long way off hitting commercial pathways, the conference was told consumer acceptance was still far from sealed.

Joe Chan, involved in purchasing wheat for the Indonesian market, said flour millers had no intrinsic opposition to GM, but the lead would be taken from government and there was still a general consumer unease towards the technology.

Along with his upbeat view on GM, Mr Burke was also positive about the Australian grains industry, in spite of the spectre of climate change and the global economic slowdown.

Mr Burke told the 700 grain traders, growers and industry representatives at the Melbourne conference that the fundamentals for the industry were sound.

"The fundamental demand for food has not changed," he said.

"The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation estimates the world needs to double food production in the next 20 years."

He spoke positively about the deregulation experience.

"For me, the decision was crystallised by a discussion with a grower from Western Australia, who simply asked me 'it's my grain, why can't I market it as I please'," Mr Burke said.

Meanwhile, in other GM news, Bayer CropScience and CSIRO have announced a research and development deal to include a focus on cereals.

A long time deal has been struck between Bayer and the Australian government research arm, which is a leader in world wheat varieties.

The agreement establishes a far-reaching joint research and development program between CSIRO and Bayer CropScience, aimed at improving the productivity and sustainability of cereal production utilizing modern techniques.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
GM crops do not yield more than other crops. They often yield less. Google the report "Failure to yield". The GM crops to date are: soy, corn, cotton, canola and sugar beet (grown in the US last year). These crops are mainly used for animal feed, processed food and biofuels. In South America farmers are being thrown off land so GM soy can be grown for export as animal feed in Europe and China. The increased use of herbicide on GM crops is causing a health disaster. Google "Paraguay's Painful Harvest" to view what is happening. Consumers are concerned about what animals are fed. GM DNA has been found in the gut and organs of animals fed GM food. There are no studies on what effect this might be having on human health. GM crops are owned by seed companies that are also chemical and pharmaceutical companies. They sell both the seed and the weedkillers for the GM crops. Michigan State University has mapped the takeover of seed companies by chemical companies between 1996 and 2008 here: www.msu.edu/~howardp Terrry Redman should give detailed evidence for his support of GM. Then be able to discuss his support at public forums.
Posted by Fran, 29/07/2009 2:20:27 PM
Years ago, when some one was an A Grade fool we called them a Berk. Not much has changed! Tony Burke is blinded by the hype and sales skills of the GM mob, and it really shows. He did NOT see or even return phone calls from the Non GM famers who were expecting him to at least see the other (darker) side of what the big companies have done to them personally, or even look at healthy non-GM farms. As for Bayer and CSIRO deals, now we have Dow being "supported "in Vic to the tune of millions, and CSIRO is also taxypayer funded. SO? WHY?? are we, the Australian public being asked to fund and support these multi billion dollar self interested, Agri co's whose sole and total agendas are PROFIT! Saving the world from hunger as so often said..is just that! words! Nowhere ever has any of that verbage been backed up by proof, either of quality safety or even yield. As to GM wheat, ha! Again lots of promises and after the trials here in Vic and SA riverland, they have nothing useful! Massive gains in wheat production have been acheived already with Normal! hybrids. We sell to EU, if we go GM we loose a good market, and we hand sales to Russia on a plate, yeah, great move Mr Burke...
Posted by amicus curiae, 29/07/2009 2:42:01 PM
Burke's statement "The fundamental demand for food has not changed" is totally stupid. Of course people have to eat but the majority of all consumers do not want scientists tampering with their food and disrupting genes within the food itself with unknown consequences. There is no tracking of GM food so how can any of these pro-GM advocates say that GM food is safe without this fundamental scientific trace method? So what happens Burke when the true scientific testing happening now shows without doubt that GM food is unsafe? Are you still going to be on your hobby horse?
Posted by Vicki Wilson, 29/07/2009 3:38:25 PM
It seems the only opinions the government are interested in listening to are the GM corporates. Australia needs to vote politicians like this out and never to be returned.
Posted by Sam, 29/07/2009 4:20:40 PM
It's easy to see that the government wants GM crops at all costs. Mr Redman's fact finding mission to the US and Canada addressed only pro-GM farmers who have no choice but to back GM now that they are 'in' with no turning back. The fact that there is good science for safer food options to GM is ignored. This science is underfunded because it is not backed by the GM companies' money, naturally. The fact that sane human beings all over the world want chemical free, organic food is another fact that seems to have escaped our politicians. Stock feeders have no choice either, as stock feed is hardly regulated. The only facts that our government wants to look at is the apparent immediate $$$$$ signs. They'll happily all skew the media reports till we all give in. Hang the future - that's after the next elections.
Posted by michelle, 29/07/2009 7:24:42 PM
I am sure if we put the nation's bored housewives in charge of food security the world would be a better place?

Ladies and gentlemen, we have a food production system that is far from perfect and while we have 6.7 billion mouths to feed that is the way it will always be.

Either we allow for a major die-off to occur and some lower input paradigm to assert itself or we understand that in order to keep this current project of civilisation from descending into a food insecure future, we enhance already imperfect agricultural systems.

But, for pete's sake, get off your moral high horse and see the world for what it is - far from perfect! And while we all have time to comment on a computer, it will always be so...

Posted by ArrogantFarmer, 29/07/2009 11:18:34 PM
Tony Burke has lost himself in the importance of his position. To think that GM crops are part of a constructive jigsaw puzzle is absolute delusion.

The only "jigsaw puzzle" that will be formed is the one that takes billions of dollars and years of science to dismantle from the ecosystem - after it takes hold and transforms into weeds.

Posted by Atheistno1, 30/07/2009 4:53:51 AM
Have any of the above thought GM also can be used to move genes within species to speed up disease resistant traits, quality, standability, etc, etc - much faster than conventional crossing and fixing lines and without as many other maybe undesirable genes being transferred.
Posted by all not bad, 30/07/2009 7:24:49 AM
Will Mr Burke tell us why he won't speak to the farmers concerned about GM? I think we need to launch an email assault on his office.
Posted by John Newton, 30/07/2009 7:29:55 AM
Hey, Fran, it is very easy to look for scare mongering material on the internet... on any topic. Why don't you try googling 'benefits of GM'?! You might surprise yourself what you will learn if you look at both sides of the story, as opposed to the only one you think is right. Open your mind and have fun.

I think it is disgusting that there are hundreds of millions of people on this earth starving to death and we are debating their future.

Posted by brad, 30/07/2009 7:33:34 AM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Agriculture Minister Tony Burke
Agriculture Minister Tony Burke
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
27 July, 2009
POLL
Q: Has the Federal Government got the balance right between water buybacks and investment in more efficient irrigation infrastructure in the Murray Darling?

Yes
(3.8%)

No - there should be more investment in infrastructure
(73.8%)

No - there should be more emphasis on water buybacks
(13.7%)

Undecided
(8.7%)

Total Votes: 416
Poll Date: 26 July, 2009
BLOGS
22 July, 2009

Most popular articles




The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...