News 
 National Rural News 
 Forestry 
 General 
 MIS "solid", says timber industry 

MIS "solid", says timber industry

14 May, 2009 03:20 PM
THE timber industry has hit back at critics of the managed investment schemes (MIS) fuelling growth of plantations around the country, saying official Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics (ABARE) figures prove the forest industry has solid foundation.

The forest industry has bucked the trend of other industries by growing over the last 12 months, and particularly over the last six months of last year, according to the National Association of Forest Industries (NAFI).

“The ABARE report, Australian Forest and Wood Products Statistics, shows that forestry continues to grow, experiencing continued plantation expansion of more than 4 percent, to just under 2 million hectares and an increase in exports of 5 percent to reach $2.5 billion," NAFI CEO Allan Hansard says.

"This growth in the industry is in stark contrast to other key Australian industries that have suffered contractions in their activity and inevitable job losses over the same period.

“This report backs up what we’ve been saying: that forestry is a strong industry, with a solid foundation and, with increased plantation expansion is perfectly positioned to meet the increased demand for timber products as the world recovers from the current global financial crisis.

“These figures justify and confirm the Government’s plantation strategy driven by continued MIS projects.

"Over $6 billion has already been invested in rural and regional Australia, creating over 60,000 much needed jobs and a world class plantation based industry.

"The strong growth in exports from these plantations (up 13 percent in value terms) reflects the high regard world markets have for our plantation industry and the products they produce.

"This places the industry in good stead to ride through the global economic crisis and to rapidly grow in the future.

“Australia’s renewable, sustainable forestry industry also provides enormous environmental benefits that increase exponentially with the growth of the industry.

"As Australia’s only carbon positive industry, forestry has the capacity to sequester around 81 million tonnes of carbon from the atmosphere every year.

"In addition to the forests being carbon sinks, the products produced from them continue to store carbon, and the bioenergy produced from wood waste can significantly reduce Australia’s reliance on fossil fuels.”

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
So, Mr Hansard, we understand why you have to issue a press release to your thousands of investors, who by now must be very worried.

ABARE simply records what has happened. An increase in area of just 4pc really means that there has been a substantial drop in plantings if the total area is now some 2 million hectares with the 'crop' rotation being 10 years.

Exports have increased because more plantations have reached maturity. You have not told us what the profit was from that harvest.

If the price per tonne increased by 13pc, at what price did it start? If the price received got you into this sort of trouble, how bad was it before the increase?

Could you please detail where the 60,000 jobs are or were, in the plantation industry? As for expansion, where is that going to come from, now the cheap investor money has dried up?

One additional question. A Google ad popped up on my screen the other day from Great Southern. I found that I could invest over $13,000 in 1/3 of a hectare of hardwood plantation. Can you explain the economics behind $39,000 a hectare for hardwood plantation establishment and management?

Michael Pascoe will, I am sure, be interested in you response. So shall I for that matter.

Posted by Roger Crook, 15/05/2009 8:32:12 AM
As Roger's numbers make clear, only a very small portion of the claimed $6 billion investment actually made it into the region where the tax dodge was located.

What NAFI has to say about forestry in general is quite true but a good regrowth forest can produce just as much wood as a plantation at a fraction of the cost.

They big note their 2 million hectares of nation wide tax rort when there is 14 million ha of regrowth in NSW alone that has been deliberately deprived of market access.

This is now the second time in the past half century that the plantation sector has been eager to lay the boot into the native forest sector for competitive gain but then seek to hide behind an industry-wide facade when all their shonky chooks come home to roost.

NAFI is now dependent on the MIS sector for a large part of its funding so it is no surprise that they should prompt the famous "Chistene Keeler" response to Profumo's defence, that is: "Well, he would say that, wouldn't he".

Posted by Ian Mott, 15/05/2009 10:24:51 AM
From living in a few rural communities where MIS schemes have invaded, I've seen that they have bought in their labourers from elsewhere (or used backpackers), so there is no employment for the local community.

Figures quote areas planted but what about survival? There are quite a few disasters in Qld where they are planting temperate species in subtropical/ tropical environments.

Come on re the carbon sequestration point - Aust is so small in the scheme of things and the areas where trees can grow well enough (the better environments best suited to agricultural production), there is very much an imbalance in all of this!

Then there is the issue of plantations of native species harvesting groundwater - our eucs are very efficient at that.

Posted by dr po, 15/05/2009 12:08:20 PM
The news on Great Southern has just been announced. We are waiting Mr Hansard.
Posted by Roger Crook, 19/05/2009 7:37:31 AM
Yes there might be less planting done but you have to take into account why the extra 1% export. Privately owned SG1 land that is being cleared for housing also contract them to clear their land while they can still sell the wood.
Posted by outside of the box, 23/05/2009 12:03:36 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
12 May, 2009
13 May, 2009
POLL
Q: Has the Federal Government gone too far into debt?

Yes
(86.8%)

No
(9.9%)

Undecided
(3.3%)

Total Votes: 873
Poll Date: 10 May, 2009

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...