News 
 National Rural News 
 Dairy 
 General 
 Cutting the carbon hoofprint 

Cutting the carbon hoofprint

28 Jul, 2008 02:41 PM
New research from Cornell University in the United States shows that cows treated with recombinant Bovine Somatotropin make more milk on fewer resources - the net result is those cows reduce their environmental impact.

The study was published in a recent issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Researchers note that making milk uses a lot of land, energy and feed.

However, rBST can reduce the carbon hoofprint by easing energy, land and nutritional inputs necessary to sustain milk production at levels to meet market demand.

The research showed that giving rBST to one million cows would enable the same amount of milk to be produced 157,000 fewer cows.

The nutrient savings would be 491,000 tonnes of corn, 158,000t of soybeans, and total feedstuffs would be reduced by 2.3mt.

And producers could reduce cropland use by 480,000 acres and cut soil erosion by 2.3mt annually.

Those are big numbers from a single technology available to dairy farmers for the past 15 years.

In a statement announcing the research results, Judith L. Capper said: "Supplementing cows with rBST on an industry-wide scale would improve sustainability and redcue the dairy indsutry's contribution to water acidification, algal growth and global warming."

Ms Capper is a post-doctoral research and the lead author of the report.

Capper was joined in the research by Dale E. Bauman, Cornell professor of animal science and the corresponding author; Euridice Castaneda-Gutierrez, former Cornel post-doctoral researcher; and Roger A. Cady, Monsanto. Cornell funded the research.

At a time when the dairy industry is forcing farmers to stop using the product in their herds, Bauman notes that the study "demonstrates that use of rBST markedly improves the efficiency of milk production, mitigates environmental impact including greenhouse gas emissions and reduces natural resource requirements such as fossil fuel, water and land use".

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Hmmm... No known detrimental side effects to anyone, human or bovine. Proven positive effects for both farmers and the general environment. But there are a few Californians who are afraid of anything hormonal. We better ban it anyway.
Posted by Ben, 29/07/2008 2:13:57 AM
Bovine somatotropin (abbreviated bST and BST) is a protein hormone produced in the pituitary glands of cattle. It is also called bovine growth hormone, or BGH.

BST can be produced synthetically, using recombinant DNA technology. The resulting product is called recombinant bovine somatotropin (rBST), recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH), or artificial growth hormone. It is administered to the cow by injection and used to increase milk production. Currently Monsanto is the only company that markets recombinant bovine somatotropin, under the trade name Posilac. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bovine_somatotropin ==========

Yep, let's start using this stuff and kill the cattle earlier thus saving the world from their carbon footprint! This is an old concept that is dying a slow death but keeps being resurfaced to look like a novel idea!

Posted by Pops, 29/07/2008 7:56:46 AM
Another silver bullet and guess what, from a chemical company, gee. The same claims have been made for their antibiotic products. How about just providing the animals with good nutrition and using natural proven probiotics such as live yeasts and providing a basal ration that hasn't been forced using artificial fertilisers. may even help with N content of the urine!
Posted by RW, 29/07/2008 10:55:30 AM
Wikipedia also mentions the EU's Scientific Committee's 1999 findings that the use of rBST substantially increased health problems with cows including foot problems, mastitis, injection site reaction, impinged on the welfare of the animals and caused reproductive disorders. It concluded that on animal health and welfare grounds rBSt should not be used. Use of rBST thus is illegal in the EU on these grounds. Canada has found similarly.
Posted by Carole de Fraga, 29/07/2008 1:18:32 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Did you support the striking truck drivers?

Yes - they need fairer conditions
(80.7%)

No - they have disrupted business
(12%)

Undecided - more information needed
(7.3%)

Total Votes: 777
Poll Date: 28 July, 2008

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



The Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...